W3C

– DRAFT –
WoT-WG/IG

31 May 2023

Attendees

Present
Cristiano_Aguzzi, Daniel_Peintner, David_Ezell, Ege_Korkan, Kaz_Ashimura, Kunihiko_Toumura, Luca_Barbato, Michael_Koster, Michael_McCool, Tetsushi_Matsuda, Tomoaki_Mizushima
Regrets
Sebastian
Chair
McCool
Scribe
Ege

Meeting minutes

Minutes Review

<kaz> May-24

McCool: we are 1 week into PR period
… I do not see any problems

WoT calls calendar

McCool: we updated all the links

Kaz: architecture and marketing will be updated

dp: we do not have a single email per call anymore

McCool: we can use the calendar entries

McCool: can we ask for this from the systems team?

Kaz: let's point to the calendar for now. I will also send emails as a backup

w3c/calendar#91

<kaz> sysreq

Ege: I asked for the recurring event feature but I did not get any replies

Kaz: please send an email to sysreq team

<McCool> (Michael Koster has checked - IEs can access calendar)

Ege: we want to ask whether there is any interest to change the slot of the TD call

McCool: let's do a doodle poll with 1h slots, based on the data it can be 2h or not

McCool: we have also changed the chairs call slot

WG Charter

<kaz> Strategy pipeline for the WoT WG Charter

McCool: what is the status of the charter?

Kaz: PLH is waiting for the chairs to clarify the roles of the proposed 3 co-Chairs.

TPAC

McCool: our slots are confirmed for thursday and friday
… we need to fix the agenda still

Ege: webagents proposed a slot in monday morning

McCool: we can create a section for such joint calls and put agenda items
… and not have a call if there are no agenda items

Kaz: for MEIG, I have talked with Chris Needham and he is interested

Kaz: We might want to think of linked buildings cg

McCool: joint calls should be priority

Ege: do we use their slots or ours?

McCool: it depends on the availability

Publication

McCool: we have to move on with creating PR

Kaz: we should have resolutions for Architecture and TD

Architecture

<McCool> wot-architecture PR 917 - Uplevel Profile Section

McCool: I have changed the spec to remove details on the current profiles

McCool: we should not commit to those names since they are premature

McCool: I would like to merge it

<kaz> wot-architecture PR 914 - Add Accessibility Considerations

McCool: I have also added PR 914 regarding accesibility

McCool: no objections, so we can merge. We still have 1 week to review it and since it is one clean section, it can be removed

<McCool> Proposal: Merge w3c/wot-architecture#917 and w3c/wot-architecture#914 into the Proposed Recommendation draft for Architecture 1.1

RESOLUTION: Merge w3c/wot-architecture#917 and w3c/wot-architecture#914 into the Proposed Recommendation draft for Architecture 1.1

https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/177c3161-bd01-436b-a2ae-bf59412ead8f

Meetups

McCool: Is there any meetups planned?

Ege: WoT CG will hold an event to explain WoT and also disclose the tutorial series that has been in the works

<McCool> proposal: Accept the resolution by the Architecture TF last week to start the review of the Architecture 1.1 PR draft, so there is 1 week of review remaining.

RESOLUTION: Accept the resolution by the Architecture TF last week to start the review of the Architecture 1.1 Proposed Recommendation draft, so there is 1 week of review remaining.

<McCool> proposal: Accept the resolution by the Thing Description TF last week to start the review of the Thing Description 1.1 Proposed Recommendation draft, so there is 1 week of review remaining, except for minor editorial changes.

<McCool> proposal: Thing Description 1.1 was ready for review last week, but a clear resolution was not made. Given the situation, we would like to make a resolution now to review the Thing Description 1.1 Proposed Recommendation draft, but to complete the review within 1 week.

<McCool> proposal: Thing Description 1.1 was ready for review last week, but a clear resolution was not made. Given the situation, we would like to like to officially begin a review of the Thing Description 1.1 Proposed Recommendation draft now, but to complete the review within 1 week.

RESOLUTION: Thing Description 1.1 was ready for review last week, but a clear resolution was not made. Given the situation, we would like to like to officially begin a review of the Thing Description 1.1 Proposed Recommendation draft now, but to complete the review within 1 week.

<kaz> [adjourned]

Summary of resolutions

  1. Merge w3c/wot-architecture#917 and w3c/wot-architecture#914 into the Proposed Recommendation draft for Architecture 1.1
  2. Accept the resolution by the Architecture TF last week to start the review of the Architecture 1.1 Proposed Recommendation draft, so there is 1 week of review remaining.
  3. Thing Description 1.1 was ready for review last week, but a clear resolution was not made. Given the situation, we would like to like to officially begin a review of the Thing Description 1.1 Proposed Recommendation draft now, but to complete the review within 1 week.
Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by scribe.perl version 210 (Wed Jan 11 19:21:32 2023 UTC).