IRC log of wcag3-policy on 2023-05-15
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 15:54:10 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #wcag3-policy
- 15:54:14 [RRSAgent]
- logging to https://www.w3.org/2023/05/15-wcag3-policy-irc
- 15:55:04 [shadi]
- Meeting: Guidance for Policy Makers Subgroup
- 15:55:13 [shadi]
- chair: Shadi
- 15:56:51 [shadi]
- agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2023AprJun/0142.html
- 15:58:33 [bruce_bailey]
- bruce_bailey has joined #wcag3-policy
- 15:58:45 [bruce_bailey]
- present+
- 15:58:52 [shadi]
- present+
- 16:02:39 [Laura_Carlson]
- Laura_Carlson has joined #wcag3-policy
- 16:02:45 [shadi]
- https://github.com/w3c/silver/wiki/Guidance-for-policy-makers-Subgroup
- 16:03:35 [Wilco]
- Wilco has joined #wcag3-policy
- 16:03:44 [bruce_bailey]
- https://w3c.github.io/silver/use-cases/
- 16:04:06 [Wilco]
- present+
- 16:05:09 [bruce_bailey]
- Explore the Use cases for WCAG 3.0 to extract potential considerations for designing the conformance section, and for further informative guidance for policy makers wanting to adopt WCAG.
- 16:05:50 [Wilco]
- scribe+
- 16:06:12 [Wilco]
- agenda?
- 16:06:31 [wendyreid]
- wendyreid has joined #wcag3-policy
- 16:06:33 [Wilco]
- Shadi: We will be meeting the next 8 weeks
- 16:06:57 [Wilco]
- ... If anyone's not able to scribe, let me know and you won't be on the scribe list
- 16:07:28 [Laura_Carlson]
- present+ Laura_Carlson
- 16:07:39 [Wilco]
- ... The next 8 Mondays, noon US Eastern, we'll meet
- 16:08:01 [shadi]
- https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20230515T120000&p1=43
- 16:08:30 [shadi]
- https://www.w3.org/2017/08/telecon-info_silver-fri
- 16:08:50 [kirkwood]
- present+
- 16:09:03 [wendyreid]
- present+
- 16:09:03 [Wilco]
- ... the idea of the subgroup is to provide a proposal to the parent group.
- 16:09:27 [Wilco]
- ... They'll decide next steps from there. We'll try to follow an iterative approach
- 16:09:37 [shadi]
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/12O-1BKwlx4iR43GvFzmScejq2xU9V-rehrlxN42st5M/edit
- 16:10:04 [Wilco]
- ... I hope everyone has read the subgroup handbook.
- 16:10:33 [shadi]
- https://github.com/w3c/silver/wiki/Guidance-for-policy-makers-Subgroup
- 16:10:41 [Wilco]
- ... We'll take minutes. I'll send those out to the list, and we'll link them from the subgroup page.
- 16:12:09 [bruce_bailey]
- q+ to ask where to put early comments/notes/questions ?
- 16:12:10 [Wilco]
- ... After about 4 or 5 weeks we should provide an update to AGWG. During the regular AGWG calls there is a short update 2 min.
- 16:12:21 [Wilco]
- ack b
- 16:12:21 [Zakim]
- bruce_bailey, you wanted to ask where to put early comments/notes/questions ?
- 16:12:53 [Wilco]
- Bruce: Where can we put scratchpad kind-of things? I started to write my notes for myself on the use cases.
- 16:13:22 [Wilco]
- Wilco: I can create a Google doc
- 16:13:57 [Wilco]
- Shadi: A wiki gets messy quite quickly. A Google doc is a bit easier.
- 16:14:14 [kirkwood]
- +1 to Google doc for scratch pad
- 16:19:39 [Wilco]
- TOPIC: Goals of the subgroup
- 16:19:48 [Wilco]
- Shadi: My feeling is that we often confuse conformance and compliance.
- 16:20:09 [bruce_bailey]
- +1 for distinguishing between conformance and compliance
- 16:20:28 [shadi]
- https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/Substantial_Conformance/Example_Scenarios
- 16:20:35 [Wilco]
- ... Some policies basically say "do WCAG", and we end up having policy discussions.
- 16:21:48 [Wilco]
- ... The idea from this document was that there are technical standards, technical guidance, and advisory
- 16:22:50 [Wilco]
- ... In the previous subgroup we had consensus (not the working group) on these examples.
- 16:23:04 [Wilco]
- ... There was also a draft of how could technical standards contribute to the situation.
- 16:23:28 [Wilco]
- ... For example, maybe a standard could define the severity of certain issues.
- 16:24:05 [Wilco]
- ... Then beyond the technical standard there could be additional guidance, for example good practices on an accessibility statement
- 16:25:00 [Wilco]
- ... And then there are maybe considerations of what policies could do. Depending on relative priority, maybe the threshold of how many bugs are acceptable is different in a healthcare situation from an entertainment situation.
- 16:25:12 [Wilco]
- ... One comment from Gregg in a previous cool stood out for me.
- 16:25:49 [Wilco]
- ... We spend a lot of time on harmonising guidelines. But we haven't spent so much time helping policy makers consider.
- 16:26:10 [Wilco]
- ... We know there are hardly any website meet everything fully, but does that mean they are not compliant, and are they not compliant to the same degree?
- 16:26:44 [Wilco]
- ... We're not telling policy makers how to create policy. But from a technical perspective, what can we build into WCAG 3 to enable policy makers to address issues that occur in real live.
- 16:26:48 [Wilco]
- s/live/life
- 16:27:30 [Wilco]
- ... The subgroup came up with 11 situations, with on average 2 or 3 examples.
- 16:28:10 [Wilco]
- ... My proposal for this subgroup is that we continue the work; Go through the situations 1 by 1.
- 16:28:35 [Wilco]
- ... We'll review each of the situations, and come up with ideas of what could be done.
- 16:28:50 [Wilco]
- ... What I saw from that wiki was that there's a lot of overlap
- 16:29:13 [Wilco]
- ... We can try out one situation together, and then assign some homework.
- 16:29:37 [Wilco]
- ... We'll have in 3 or 4 weeks a list of what could be done. I don't want to go back too much on the situations though.
- 16:30:03 [Wilco]
- ... And then in the later half of the subgroup work, I hope we can come out with a outline for a guidance document for policy makers.
- 16:30:27 [Wilco]
- ... Two parts; What should AGWG consider regarding conformance, and the second; what should policy makers consider when adopting WCAG
- 16:30:34 [bruce_bailey]
- q+ to ask about scope for "policy makers"
- 16:31:13 [Wilco]
- Bruce: I was happy with everything, until you said "laws".
- 16:31:31 [Wilco]
- ... When we're talking about organisations, that's very broad. If we're talking about laws, that's much narrower.
- 16:32:29 [Wilco]
- ... I don't have much regulation perspective. I'm also not clear what the difference is between writing clearly and writing anything of special value to policy makers vs regulators & litigators
- 16:33:51 [Wilco]
- Shadi: Short answer is I don't know. If we need to define the audience more narrowly we can work on that.
- 16:34:13 [wendyreid]
- q+
- 16:34:25 [bruce_bailey]
- "technical implications for adopting wcag"
- 16:34:32 [bruce_bailey]
- q-
- 16:34:38 [Wilco]
- ... From a technical perspective, when we're saying what the technical considerations are, is there a substantial difference between the policy of an organisation or in law.
- 16:34:53 [Wilco]
- ... Scale is different, but from a technical perspective is there a big difference?
- 16:35:20 [Wilco]
- Wendy: It would be weird to see some of these things.
- 16:36:46 [Wilco]
- ... The web has many different uses. Just saying "follow this" isn't useful. Giving specific ways and guidance is useful.
- 16:37:15 [Wilco]
- Bruce: I think there's a different threshold as soon as its about laws.
- 16:37:35 [Wilco]
- ... It's certainly a problem in federal space. I'm not sure how WCAG could help with that.
- 16:38:35 [Wilco]
- ... One thing this use case document does is highlight all the different words; regulator, policy maker, etc. This uses those words interchengably. I want to get a handle of that.
- 16:38:53 [Wilco]
- Shadi: Would you be interested to help draft a disclaimer? What we're doing, and what we're not doing.
- 16:39:19 [Wilco]
- ... We're not telling regulators, policy makers, what to put into their documents. We don't tell law makers how to write laws.
- 16:39:35 [bruce_bailey]
- bruce also voluntold for disclaimer for this docuement
- 16:39:59 [Wilco]
- ... It's the technical considerations. What about timelines, what happens when acquiring a company, what happens if you host other's content.
- 16:40:43 [Wilco]
- ... This is often an area of sensitivity.
- 16:40:53 [Wilco]
- Bruce: Yes, happy to try to write this disclaimer.
- 16:41:11 [Wilco]
- ... I think I understand WCAG 3 to be charged to saying something to policy makers though? That's the conundrum.
- 16:41:25 [Wilco]
- Shadi: There's WCAG 3 as the standard, and then there's the package. The methods, understanding, etc.
- 16:42:33 [Wilco]
- ... Maybe we come out with certain suggestions / considerations for WCAG 3 conformance? Maybe not? But at the very least we should come up with guidance to help policy makers.
- 16:43:11 [Wilco]
- Laura: I have some concerns for supplying loopholes to organisations for making something accessible.
- 16:43:26 [wendyreid]
- q+
- 16:43:45 [Wilco]
- Shadi: Absolutely, these aren't loopholes. There are overal considerations, these exist.
- 16:44:16 [Wilco]
- John: I'm having a difficult time with what the problem we're trying to solve really is.
- 16:44:48 [bruce_bailey]
- q+ to ask Laura if "conformance loophole" is already in one the documents we have looked at today?
- 16:45:09 [Wilco]
- ... Policy often changes in accordance with what the burden is.
- 16:45:22 [Wilco]
- ... If we're going to give tools to policy makers, that's one thing.
- 16:45:32 [bruce_bailey]
- +1 to john kirkwood
- 16:45:41 [Wilco]
- Shadi: There's a problem description in the use cases document.
- 16:46:07 [bruce_bailey]
- policy writer tool kit is a provocative idea
- 16:46:14 [Wilco]
- ... The problem we're trying to address is that scenario Wendy mentions. "Do WCAG". No website really meets that. Is that a realistic expectation?
- 16:46:50 [Wilco]
- Wendy: I think there's two ways to view this.
- 16:46:51 [shadi]
- ack wendy
- 16:47:25 [Wilco]
- ... We can go back to AGWG and say there are gaps that may need to be filled. The other direction is down to the end uers.
- 16:47:40 [Wilco]
- ... I don't think anyone wants to create loopholes. What I think we can do is point to who's responsible for what.
- 16:48:03 [bruce_bailey]
- +1 to help scope out "who is responsible for what"
- 16:48:31 [Wilco]
- ... For example a website with many authors. One solution is training, another may be with the CMS provider.
- 16:49:01 [Wilco]
- ... There should always be someone who's responsible. The site owner needs to find a solution.
- 16:49:28 [shadi]
- ack bruce
- 16:49:28 [Zakim]
- bruce_bailey, you wanted to ask Laura if "conformance loophole" is already in one the documents we have looked at today?
- 16:49:56 [Wilco]
- Bruce: Laura, do we have that phrase?
- 16:50:07 [Wilco]
- Laura: I think third party is in the conformance section
- 16:50:20 [Wilco]
- Bruce: I hope that's not characterized as a loophole.
- 16:50:40 [Laura_Carlson]
- Notes for the Media Content Conformance Section of the WCAG 3 Editor's Draft
- 16:50:46 [Laura_Carlson]
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1t2vSTNI3qG2bWgSMsfIRUdPfZ7UzxunmO1JgeOZ9s2k/
- 16:51:12 [Wilco]
- Shadi: We broke down third party. There's a difference between an airline posting a video on YouTube, and a child posting a video there.
- 16:51:20 [bruce_bailey]
- q+ to mention "substantial conformance" is "not being conformance"
- 16:51:25 [shadi]
- present+ Mike
- 16:51:52 [Wilco]
- Mike: There are a lot of organisations stuck on WCAG 2.0.
- 16:52:17 [Wilco]
- ... We have to keep documents evergreen. Organisations should keep coming back for review.
- 16:52:19 [bruce_bailey]
- Mike Gifford from Zoom chat: "Failings of WAI implementations on policy. - Stuck on WCAG 2.0 rather than ever-green approaches - Lack of adoption of ATAG 2.0 - Lack of criteria geared for USA specific lawsuits."
- 16:52:28 [Wilco]
- ... Legislators don't seem to remember that.
- 16:52:45 [Wilco]
- ... I'm hoping ATAG will be part of this. Legislators need to think about the authoring tools.
- 16:53:12 [Wilco]
- ... I have yet to see a serious RFP for ATAG.
- 16:53:50 [Laura_Carlson]
- +1 to Mike
- 16:53:52 [bruce_bailey]
- https://www.w3.org/TR/ATAG20/
- 16:53:53 [Wilco]
- ... In many cases this will be tested in the US courts. Nowhere else. How do we set this up for cases to be tried effectively.
- 16:54:27 [Wilco]
- Shadi: There are two situations in this dealing with the cascade of responsibilities.
- 16:54:29 [mgifford]
- mgifford has joined #wcag3-policy
- 16:54:40 [Wilco]
- ... We need to consider the chain of responsibilities in web content.
- 16:54:45 [wendyreid]
- q+
- 16:55:05 [shadi]
- zakim, close queue
- 16:55:05 [Zakim]
- ok, shadi, the speaker queue is closed
- 16:55:16 [Wilco]
- Bruce: I wanted to mention that substantial conformance means non-conformance.
- 16:55:39 [Wilco]
- Shadi: I don't think we're trying to define conformance, substantial, partial.
- 16:55:53 [mgifford]
- Looking forward to that Bruce, thanks. Would love to get your thoughts on ATAG.
- 16:56:02 [Wilco]
- ... We might come out with suggestions. The more important part is guidance.
- 16:56:13 [shadi]
- ack wendy
- 16:56:23 [Wilco]
- Wendy: We have an example of this working. The European Accessibility Act.
- 16:56:38 [Wilco]
- ... There are separate requirements for Ebooks, readers, and retailers.
- 16:56:54 [Wilco]
- ... I'm not responsibility for the epub documents on our platform. The author is, and it's clearly defined.
- 16:56:58 [bruce_bailey]
- @wendy can you point to those separations spread out ?
- 16:57:08 [bruce_bailey]
- Sounds like a good approarch
- 16:57:10 [Wilco]
- ... We should be able to do that for everything.
- 16:57:47 [Wilco]
- Shadi: I feel the EAA has a lot of roles defined for physical products. It doesn't have that for services.
- 16:58:11 [kirkwood]
- interesing e- book approach
- 16:58:20 [Wilco]
- ... There will be a lot of detail to hash out.
- 16:58:47 [Wilco]
- TOPIC: Homework
- 16:58:55 [Wilco]
- Shadi: I'd like people to go through the use cases document
- 16:59:03 [shadi]
- https://w3c.github.io/silver/use-cases/
- 16:59:20 [shadi]
- https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/Substantial_Conformance/Example_Scenarios
- 16:59:47 [mgifford]
- If we have questions or thoughts on the use cases document, do we leave thoughts in an issue queue or where?
- 17:00:01 [Wilco]
- ... Have a look at these examples as well
- 17:00:04 [Wilco]
- q+
- 17:00:35 [mgifford]
- Looking forward to future calls Wilco.
- 17:01:14 [Laura_Carlson]
- Bye. Thanks everyone.
- 17:01:42 [Laura_Carlson]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 17:01:44 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/05/15-wcag3-policy-minutes.html Laura_Carlson
- 17:02:20 [shadi]
- rrsagent, make minutes public
- 17:02:20 [RRSAgent]
- I'm logging. I don't understand 'make minutes public', shadi. Try /msg RRSAgent help
- 17:06:04 [shadi]
- rrsagent, make logs public
- 17:06:11 [shadi]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 17:06:12 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/05/15-wcag3-policy-minutes.html shadi
- 20:31:42 [kirkwood]
- kirkwood has joined #wcag3-policy