15:49:55 RRSAgent has joined #rdf-star 15:50:00 logging to https://www.w3.org/2023/05/04-rdf-star-irc 15:50:00 RRSAgent, make logs Public 15:50:01 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), pchampin 15:50:12 meeting: RDF-star WG weekly meeting 15:51:31 previous meeting: https://www.w3.org/2023/04/27-rdf-star-minutes.html 15:51:44 next meeting: https://www.w3.org/2023/05/11-rdf-star-minutes.html 15:51:57 agenda: https://beta.w3.org/events/meetings/f2add3af-6743-4f52-8fcc-4f62c6cdd8af/20230504T120000/#agenda 15:51:57 clear agenda 15:51:57 agenda+ Scribe: Alexiev, Vladimir (alternate: Arndt, Dörthe) 15:51:57 agenda+ Approval of last week's minutes: -> 1 https://www.w3.org/2023/04/27-rdf-star-minutes.html 15:51:57 agenda+ TPAC 2023 attendance 15:51:58 agenda+ Meeting next week 15:52:00 agenda+ Status of "First Public Working Draft" (FPWD) 15:52:03 agenda+ Use Case Proposals 15:52:05 agenda+ Review of open actions, available at -> 2 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/3 15:52:07 ghurlbot, status? 15:52:07 pchampin, the delay is 15, issues are on, names are on, commands are ignored from RRSAgent and Zakim; and the repository is https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg 15:52:08 agenda+ Review of pull requests, available at -> 3 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/4 15:52:11 agenda+ Any Other Business (AOB), time permitting Next week's scribe: Arndt, Dörthe 15:52:48 afs has joined #rdf-star 15:57:05 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 15:58:02 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 16:00:29 TallTed has joined #rdf-star 16:00:53 ora has joined #rdf-star 16:01:04 Dominik_T has joined #rdf-star 16:01:24 pfps has joined #rdf-star 16:01:24 present+ 16:02:05 present+ 16:02:05 AZ has joined #rdf-star 16:02:05 present+ 16:02:05 present+ 16:02:05 present+ 16:02:05 present+ 16:02:05 present+ 16:02:05 present+ 16:02:05 chair: ora 16:02:05 present+ 16:02:14 present+ 16:02:21 zakim, who is present? 16:02:21 I don't understand your question, pfps. 16:02:29 zakim, who is here? 16:02:29 Present: ktk, ora, pchampin, Dominik_T, gkellogg, AZ, gtw, pfps, afs, Tpt 16:02:32 On IRC I see AZ, pfps, Dominik_T, ora, TallTed, gkellogg, afs, RRSAgent, Zakim, ghurlbot, driib, agendabot, csarven, VladimirAlexiev, Timothe, Tpt, ktk, rhiaro, gtw, pchampin 16:03:19 present+ 16:03:21 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:03:22 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/05/04-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 16:03:30 Zakim, who's here? 16:03:30 Present: ktk, ora, pchampin, Dominik_T, gkellogg, AZ, gtw, pfps, afs, Tpt, TallTed 16:03:30 doerthe has joined #rdf-star 16:03:30 On IRC I see AZ, pfps, Dominik_T, ora, TallTed, gkellogg, afs, RRSAgent, Zakim, ghurlbot, driib, agendabot, csarven, VladimirAlexiev, Timothe, Tpt, ktk, rhiaro, gtw, pchampin 16:03:39 agenda? 16:04:04 present+ 16:04:19 sctibe+ doerthe 16:04:34 scribe+ doerthe 16:04:37 zakim, open item 2 16:04:37 agendum 2 -- Approval of last week's minutes: -> 1 https://www.w3.org/2023/04/27-rdf-star-minutes.html -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:04:48 minutes look fine to me 16:04:52 zakim, close item 1 16:04:52 agendum 1, Scribe: Alexiev, Vladimir (alternate: Arndt, Dörthe), closed 16:04:54 I see 8 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 16:04:54 2. Approval of last week's minutes: -> 1 https://www.w3.org/2023/04/27-rdf-star-minutes.html [from agendabot] 16:05:24 PROPOSAL: Approve last week's minutes 16:05:27 +1 16:05:28 +1 16:05:29 +1 16:05:30 +0 16:05:33 +1 16:05:39 +1 16:05:39 +1 16:05:59 +0 I've failed to review them 16:06:17 RESOLVED: Approve last week's minutes 16:06:28 zakim, next item 16:06:28 agendum 3 -- TPAC 2023 attendance -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:07:58 ora: no much response on possible attendance so far 16:08:13 I would love to meet in person at TPAC but I have a 2-day meeting in the middle of the very same week 16:08:21 I'm unlikely to be able to travel, but can usually attend if remote facilities are available 16:08:26 question: how long 16:08:46 ora: experience 2 days, but more is exhausting 16:09:03 q+ 16:09:28 ack pchampin 16:09:33 pchampin: TPAC will be hybrid 16:09:45 q+ 16:10:12 ora: who can attend? 16:10:25 q+ 16:10:38 ack gkellogg 16:10:58 andy (don't know nick): I will try to attend 16:11:11 s/andy/afs/ 16:11:17 ack ktk 16:11:29 s/ (don't know nick)// 16:11:33 gkellogg: attendance is also interesting for interaction with other groups 16:12:19 ktk: I would like many people to attend, let us know if you need invites etc... 16:12:45 q+ 16:13:07 regrets+ olaf 16:13:10 q+ 16:13:11 ora: I think we have enough people interested 16:13:18 ack Dominik_T 16:13:39 Dominik_T: I will most likely not be able to attend physically 16:14:48 q? 16:14:53 ack pchampin 16:15:13 ktk: so let's declare interest 16:15:52 pchampin: no commitment, but we need to communicate preferences (start/end of week) 16:16:05 no preference for me 16:16:10 ktk: please let us know your preferences 16:16:11 No strong preference on the days for me 16:16:14 Pref Tues or Thurs (around the plenary day) 16:16:15 Either beginning or ending, but don't overlap with RCH or JSON-LD CG 16:16:45 (of protocol, not sure how to remove) I also want to attend and have no preferences 16:16:47 Pref Mon and Fri 16:17:06 Monday and Friday preferably 16:17:14 pchampin: I will collect preferences and ask 16:18:19 action ora to respond to W3C about TPAC meeting 16:18:25 action: ora to respond to W3C about TPAC meeting 16:18:33 Created -> action #57 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/57 16:18:39 zakim, next item 16:18:39 agendum 4 -- Meeting next week -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:19:24 ora: I will be at the knowledge graph conference next week, what about the others? should we skip the meeting? 16:19:39 ktk: I can chair if ora is the only one missing 16:19:42 zakim, next item 16:19:42 agendum 5 -- Status of "First Public Working Draft" (FPWD) -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:19:48 q+ 16:19:55 ack pchampin 16:19:56 ora: where are we 16:20:26 pchampin: request was accepted by w3c but only one hour ago 16:21:14 pchampin: that means that we will not make it to the next meeting but to a later one (date? help?) 16:21:20 q+ 16:21:28 ack afs 16:22:36 afs: two documents missing, new and ? 16:22:46 q+ 16:22:55 afs: I will produce the documents 16:22:55 ack gkellogg 16:23:56 q+ 16:24:03 ack afs 16:24:06 gkellogg: sparql results xml and rdf semantics needs some extra requests which are not yet included 16:24:24 q+ 16:24:36 ack pfps 16:25:12 afs: currently working on sparql results xml, that should not stop us 16:25:55 example: https://w3c.github.io/rdf-semantics/spec/#index-defined-elsewhere 16:26:01 q+ 16:26:07 ack gkellogg 16:26:24 q+ 16:26:27 pfps: semantics, pr resolving links to elsewhere https://w3c.github.io/rdf-semantics/spec/#index-defined-elsewhere 16:27:21 gkellogg: I prefer mark-up style to square brackets 16:28:00 pfps: it is not about the style, it is more about links ending up in the index 16:28:50 see also the discussion on the respec issue tracker: https://github.com/w3c/respec/issues/4438 16:30:13 ack pchampin 16:30:51 q+ 16:31:03 q+ 16:31:05 ack TallTed 16:31:07 gkellogg: there seems to be a bug? 16:31:23 q+ 16:31:42 pchampin: we can't change respec, we will have to work around as pfps proposed 16:31:53 ack gkellogg 16:32:08 q- 16:32:48 q+ 16:32:51 q- 16:33:06 q+ 16:33:09 ack ora 16:33:26 i|semantics, pr resolving links|subtopic: respec introducing spurious terms in index 16:33:33 Discussion: situation is frustrating 16:34:24 +1 to gkellogg's workaround 16:34:34 ora: what can we do to get our first spec version out? 16:35:29 q+ 16:35:41 ack ktk 16:35:59 q+ 16:36:27 ack pchampin 16:37:57 discussion: there must be a way to fix the version of the respec used and not get errors when respec is updated? 16:38:12 ora: what do we do? 16:38:14 q+ 16:38:20 ack pchampin 16:38:33 pfps: ignore the problem for now and then solve it later on? 16:38:46 q+ 16:39:02 ack gkellogg 16:39:02 pchampin: alternatively, ignore the index and create document without it 16:39:58 gkellogg: maybe add text that specs are under development 16:40:15 I was suggesting to remove it from the snapshot, not necessarily the ED 16:41:03 Perhaps ask for a `data-noindex` attribute that could be added to an anchor with a `data-cite` to keep it out of the index 16:41:18 pchampin: I would just remove the index from the snapshot for now, not for the editing 16:41:55 ora: suggestion, we live with the current problems for now and will fix them later 16:42:51 gkellogg: I expect it to be possible to ask for small changes in respec 16:43:05 q+ 16:43:11 ack pchampin 16:44:01 agenda? 16:44:13 pchampin: we should do the open requests, and then publish 16:44:13 zakim, open 8 16:44:13 I don't understand 'open 8', pchampin 16:44:17 zakim, open item 8 16:44:17 agendum 8 -- Review of pull requests, available at -> 3 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/4 -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:45:31 q+ 16:46:24 gkellogg: I merged what I had done 16:48:29 discussion: we will create snapshots in the repo 16:50:04 ora: we have not much time left for use case discussions, we will do that next week 16:50:10 zakim, open item 7 16:50:10 agendum 7 -- Review of open actions, available at -> 2 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/3 -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:50:56 gkellogg: we can close 88 16:51:03 s/88/188/ 16:51:25 q+ to report on #49 16:51:25 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/49 -> Action 49 put in the repo the "source of truth" for labels (on pchampin) due 13 Apr 2023 16:51:45 ghurlbot, close #188 16:51:46 Cannot close issue #188. Issue not found. 16:51:48 ack gkellogg 16:51:55 ghurlbot, close #18 16:51:56 Closed -> action #18 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/18 16:52:13 ack pchampin 16:52:13 pchampin, you wanted to report on #49 16:52:27 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/blob/main/docs/labels.json 16:53:20 pchampin: report om #49 I did create a json scheme, you can do pull request to improve 16:53:33 ghurlbot, close #49 16:53:34 Closed -> action #49 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/49 16:53:54 ora: first public working draft is about to come out 16:54:28 gkellogg: once they are out we should update references 16:54:59 scribe- 16:55:00 RRSAgent, make minutes 16:55:01 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/05/04-rdf-star-minutes.html pchampin 16:55:35 (I was not expecting to scribe, so my appologies for the incomplete report :) ) 16:55:54 s/action ora to respond to W3C about TPAC meeting// 16:56:16 RRSAgent, make minutes 16:56:18 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/05/04-rdf-star-minutes.html pchampin 16:58:00 doerthe not at all, the scribing was good :) 16:58:58 thanks doerthe!