Meeting minutes
minutes review
McCool: any objections to the minutes?
… no objections, publish
quick updates
McCool: dev meeting today in the second half of TD slot
Ege: using the TD webex but a different irc
McCool: please send a reminder with the logistics
… to the wg and ig mailing lists
ACTION: Ege to send out the Dev Meeting logistics information including the WebEx coordinate to the member-wot-wg and member-wot-ig
architecture
McCool: there is an architecture presentation to review, will send out a link
… send a request to Ege for any comments
Kaz: we need to set up a meeting to review the feedback. Also should specify some specific deadline based on the event day.
McCool: we could review it on April 5th, but should allow more time
… is April 12th OK?
Ege: can't attend discovery review if it's shifted to the 19th
<McCool> proposal: defer Arch Dev meeting to April 12 (second hour of TD slot) and Discovery to April 17 (Discovery call slot).
<McCool> proposal: defer Arch Dev meeting to April 12 (second hour of TD slot)
Kaz: this could be tentative because we don't know about Lagally availability. So at least the date of the Arch Dev meeting is subject to change.
RESOLUTION: defer Arch Dev meeting to April 12 (second hour of TD slot)
<McCool> proposal: defer Discovery Dev Meeting to April 17 (Discovery call slot).
RESOLUTION: defer Discovery Dev meeting to April 17 (Discovery call slot).
testfest
McCool: scheduled for next week, focus on profiles
… maybe we aren't ready for profiles
… maybe we could work on all deliverables, is there any objection?
Kaz: what do we need to do?
McCool: we could resolve the at-risk items
Kaz: we need to clarify which testfest is used for what purpose. Also who to provide which data, etc.
McCool: we can discuss more in the testing call
charter
<kaz> Agenda for the WoT WG Charter discussion
McCool: would like to get to a final draft today, and resolve to proceed to review
… the charter requires all resolutions to be tentative and allows a week to accept/reject
… so we can resolve today and finalize on April 5th
McCool: leaves 6 weeks to May 17
… then 4 weeks to June 14th
… then only 2 more calls until July 1st
McCool: today we have PRs and issues to cover
PR 103
<kaz> PR 103 - Avoid use of "protocol binding" in charter
McCool: PR 103, any objections to merge?
… merged
PR 104
<kaz> PR 104 - Say "prescriptive when appropriate" in Mission
McCool: PR #104, any objections?
<Github> w3c/
McCool: any objections?
… merged
<Github> w3c/
McCool: PR #105, any objections?
<Github> w3c/
<Github> w3c/
McCool: merged
PR 106
McCool: PR #106, updates the starting and ending date to July 1st
<Github> w3c/
<kaz> R 106 - Update charter start and end dates|
Kaz: this is tentative, and there are still notes saying "ESTIMATED", "Start date + 2 years", etc.
McCool: no objections, merged
PR #107, update the timeline
<Github> PR 107 - Update timeline
McCool: changed the timeline to quarters for deliverable dates
Kaz: we would like all of the editors to review these dates
<kaz> diff including the proposed timeline
McCool: any objections to merging?
… no objections, merged
PR #108, editorial
<Github> PR 108 - remove dangling </dl> to remove undesired space
McCool: any objections?
… no objections, merged
PR # 109, webagents CG collaboration
<kaz> PR 109 - Add webagents CG to collaboration
McCool: add webagents CG to the list of collaborators
Kaz: we don't need to add all related groups to the list to collaborate
Ege: we could move it to the related groups list
Ege: the goal of the group is to standardize proactive web content
McCool: any objections to merging the PR
… no objections, merging
PR 110
<kaz> PR 110 - Update Proposed Co-Chairs
McCool: subtopic: Michael Koster candidate for WG chair role
McCool: we need to keep the WG Chair and TF Leader candidacy separate
McCool: there will be a week for anyone to object
McCool: no objections, merged
Kaz: W3M makes the decision, so we will have them review
PR 111
<kaz> PR 111 - Cleanup To Do Notes and Markup
Kaz: cleanup extra markup
seb: agree that it makes sense to have 3 chairs because of the many workstreams we have
<kaz> @@@ Sebastian's words to be moved later
seb: chairs can focus on specific task force workstreams
Kaz: will talk with W3M
McCool: no objections to merging PR #111
<Github> w3c/
McCool: merged
Issues
issue #14
<Github> Issue 14 - Confusing use of the term "protocol binding"
McCool: any objection to remove the label on Charter?
… no objections, removed there Charter label
draft resolution for charter
<mjk> s/closing/re-labeling
<McCool> proposal: Proceed with W3M and wide review of the draft WoT WG charter at https://
<sebastian> +1
McCool: any objections to the proposed tentative resolution?
McCool: call the question, any objections?
Kaz: this is a call for the resolution to be adopted Wednesday, April 5th
<McCool> proposal: Proceed with W3M and wide review of the draft WoT WG charter at https://
McCool: any objections to the proposed resolution?
RESOLUTION: Proceed with W3M and wide review of the draft WoT WG charter at https://
<kaz> fyi, rendered version URL
McCool: no objections
remaining items
McCool: Social impact questionnaire
McCool: any updates on OPC-UA?
seb: invited to participate in an OPC podcast and talk about WoT
McCool: we need to have a strategy discussion about adoptability and adoption
Kaz: we should have a W3M representative to participate in the discussion
McCool: AOB?
… thank you for all the work on the charter, now we have a lot of meeting minutes to review
… everyone please review these minutes off-line so we can have a single resolution to adopt them
… can Kaz post a list of the minutes for review?
Kaz: there are links already in the Charter README
<McCool> w3c/
McCool: adjourning the meeting, testing call in 10 minutes
<kaz> [testing call 10 mins past the hour]