Meeting minutes
minutes
Kaz: there was a call on Feb 22
any objections?
no
McCool: any objections
no
Quick Updates
<kaz> in US. Note the next use cases call will not be used for Charter discussion.
McCool: be aware of the time shift due to the Daylight Saving Time in US.
McCool: next week there will be the Use Case call
McCool: from March 20 we are planning to have a Testfest
… however, seems not enough time for prepearations
<MM review the doodle poll https://
McCool: how about planning 2h testing on Thursday?
… seems ok for everyone
Ege: we can cancel Marketing call and use it for testing
Kaz: are we ready for the TestFest next week?
McCool: To be honest, don't think so...
Kaz: in that case, should be postponed
McCool: why don't we decide the time but look at another week?
McCool: we can postpone for 2 weeks
<McCool> proposal: Defer testfest by two weeks to week of April 3; have it on Tuesday at 10am Eastern; Wed at 9am Eastern (testing call); Thursday at 9am Eastern.
Cristiano: would be benefical to postpone
<kaz> FYI, the current candidates on doodle are:
<kaz> Monday, 3/20 12:00 UTC (5:00 PDT, 9:00 ADT, 13:00 CET, 21:00 JST)
<kaz> Monday, 3/20 13:00 UTC (6:00 PDT, 10:00 ADT, 14:00 CET, 22:00 JST)
<kaz> Monday, 3/20 14:00 UTC (7:00 PDT, 11:00 ADT, 15:00 CET, 23:00 JST)
<kaz> Wednesday, 3/22 13:00 UTC (6:00 PDT, 10:00 ADT, 14:00 CET, 22:00 JST)
<kaz> Thursday, 3/23 13:00 UTC (6:00 PDT, 10:00 ADT, 14:00 CET, 22:00 JST)
<kaz> Thursday, 3/23 14:00 UTC (7:00 PDT, 11:00 ADT, 15:00 CET, 23:00 JST)
Sebastian: +1 postponing
… we can also use the TD slot
… but not perfect for people from Asia
RESOLUTION: Defer testfest by two weeks to week of April 3; have it on Tuesday at 10am Eastern; Wed at 9am Eastern (testing call); Thursday at 9am Eastern.
Developer Meeting
https://
McCool: does it make sense to also postpone?
Ege: we will have a conflict with the Hannover Fair
Kaz: What about the JP Meeting? I think that should be also postponed.
McCool: Let's continue this discussion during TestFest call later.
Societal Impact Questionnaire
<McCool> w3c/
McCool: worked on the Societal Impact Questionnaire
https://
please comment on this
WG Charter
McCool: we already spent too much time on the content. We should not 'overengineer'
McCool: started to label the charter issues and PRs
… such as "New Charter Plans 2023", "TD Discussion", "Propose Closing" etc
McCool: some PRs improves the text such as in the introcuction and scope sections
https://
McCool: also decided to keep Architecture normative for now
Sebastian: (also provides the policy on the discussion for the Charter)
… the details can be discussed later
Sebastian: agree to what MM said. We can also decide later about Architecture if REC or Note
McCool: yes. It is more easier to move from REC to Note then vice versa
Kaz: agree
… so let's identify which items to be included in the Charter, and which are not :)
Issue 45
Issue 45 - Do we keep Privacy and Accessibility Groups?
McCool: got a feedback from APA but no feedback from PING yet
Kaz: we don't need to mention either of them unless we have specific work items, but I'm OK with keeping the current text.
McCool: I hope, it is ok to keep the text about PING and APA
no objection
<MM closed this issue>
Issue 28
Issue 28 - Update Decision Policy
<kaz> related PR 91 - Add pre-announced CfC to decision process
<MM shows the new text in the charter about the decision policy>
Kaz: we have 2 co-Chairs, so might make sense to say "Chairs" instead of "Chair".
<MM does some fixes in the PR>
McCool: any objection to merge this PR?
no
<kaz> merged
Remaining issues
<kaz> ramaining issues
Issue 14
<kaz> Issue 14 - Confusing use of the term "protocol binding"
McCool: I'm not sure if it still relevant?
Ege: still some open topics about naming, however is not a blocker
Kaz: we already added "Detailed Work Items" label to this issue, so this is not directly related to the Charter document itself. On the other hand, I think we should identify which remaining issues to be discussed for the Charter document. For that purpose, let's think about how to proceed with the discussion.
McCool: Yes, let's continue the Charter discussion discussion in tomorrow's Architecture call
McCool: we will have the Testing call in 10min
[adjourned]