Meeting minutes
Previous minutes
https://
Cristiano: 2 minor issues
Kaz: fixed
Cristiano: Minutes are accepted
Quick updates
Cristiano: checked list w.r.t. to spec improvements
… 1 month time-frame should be ok
Daniel: reasonable plan
Kaz: fine by me also
… could add it to schedule MD document
<kaz> https://
Cristiano: will create issue
Kaz: Or PR directly
… mention resolution in main call
Cristiano: Issue is # 453
<cris_> w3c/
PROPOSAL: Publish update to Scripting API document (18th of March)
PROPOSAL: Publish update to Scripting API document (18th of March). Task-forces finalizes review 2 weeks before the publication date.
PROPOSAL: Publish update to Scripting API document (27th of March). Task-force finalizes review 2 weeks before the publication date.
Zoltan: 2 weeks to handle the document
… I think this is not enough
Kaz: The plan is okay..
… 2 weeks for the whole group review, and we usually bring the draft for publication to the main call on Wednesday.
PROPOSAL: Publish update to Scripting API document (30th of March). Task-force finalizes review but please remember before the publication date (13th of March).
Cristiano: maybe shift by 1 or 2 weeks
PROPOSAL: Publish update to Scripting API document (14th of April). Task-force finalizes review 2 weeks before the publication date (27th of March).
Cristiano: Looks good to me
Daniel: +1
PROPOSAL: Publish update to Scripting API document (13th of April). Task-force finalizes review 2 weeks before the publication date (27th of March).
RESOLUTION: Publish update to Scripting API document (13th of April). Task-force finalizes review 2 weeks before the publication date (27th of March).
Next charter review
Current status
https://
Cristiano: I think the description is fine
Kaz: mentioned during charter call. Charter draft still far from AC review
… need some more text to describe the WoT WG's intentions
… the Scripting API viewpoint s clear, though
… next point is Note or REC, and I talked with PLH about that again. with PLH
… we might want to have more discussions
… preliminary review is possible
… *nicer* to have Scripting API on REC track
… that's why we want to try normative Note track
… I personally still think it would be nicer to make it a REC, and PLH agrees. us to think about REC
… technically we can try normative note
Cristiano: I agree with stronger recommendation
… however, moving to REC might cause problems (2 major companies)
… how to convince them
… we can talk in main call
Daniel: I would still go with normative Note
… 2nd comment, I think security task-force want to move to the same note style