15:33:16 RRSAgent has joined #maturity 15:33:16 logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/11/30-maturity-irc 15:33:19 RRSAgent, make logs Public 15:33:20 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), Fazio 15:33:44 meeting: Maturity Model 15:34:21 chair: Fazio, SBH 15:38:26 Agenda+ Review and address GitHub issues 15:38:51 Agenda+ New Business 15:52:40 present+ 15:53:31 Regrets: Jake Abma, Brian O'Day 15:58:59 janina has joined #maturity 15:59:27 zakim, who's here? 15:59:27 Present: Fazio 15:59:29 On IRC I see janina, RRSAgent, Zakim, Fazio, trackbot, jspellman 15:59:34 agenda? 15:59:43 present+ 15:59:48 zakim, who's here? 15:59:48 Present: Fazio, janina 15:59:50 On IRC I see janina, RRSAgent, Zakim, Fazio, trackbot, jspellman 16:00:03 Meeting: Maturity Model Teleconference 16:00:16 Date: 30 Nov 2022 16:01:05 CharlesL has joined #maturity 16:01:12 present+ 16:01:42 nadine has joined #maturity 16:01:48 present+ 16:01:57 Sheri_B-H has joined #maturity 16:02:07 present+ 16:02:29 scribe:Sheri_B-H 16:02:41 zakim, next item 16:02:41 agendum 1 -- Review and address GitHub issues -- taken up [from Fazio] 16:02:43 scribe: Sheri_B-H 16:02:47 scribe+ 16:03:02 topic: #139 Typo, curriculums v curricula 16:04:18 Curricula is Latin, curriculums is American English 16:04:23 so Curriculums is the correct ues 16:04:26 issue 139 will be changed to curriculums 16:04:26 Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel. 16:05:47 https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/ 16:06:25 Lionel_Wolberger has joined #Maturity 16:06:33 Agenda? 16:06:47 present+ 16:06:54 Topic: #140 Executive sponsor in place' vs 'Executive leadership in place 16:06:56 Charles will make the fix and reach out to Roy if he has issues 16:07:59 I've always used the term executive sponsor, because it implies a single individual responsible for promoting it at the executive level 16:08:07 David agreed 16:09:21 Charles said the issue came from being confused about what an executive sponsor was in the non-profit world 16:09:24 Add definition to executive sponsor 16:09:30 David suggested adding a definition 16:09:36 which everyone agreed to 16:10:02 https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/issues/140 16:10:08 executive sponsor is a single individual responsible for promoting accessibility at the executive level 16:10:35 Janina: add "in any type of organization" to the end 16:10:52 David asked for objections, there were non 16:12:32 The person implementing this change needs to link all references of Executive Sponsor to the new definition, and also link the word "organization" in the definition to the definition for that term 16:13:07 David: We need to add acronyms to the glossary and make sure we are spelling them out on first usage 16:13:16 David: there are other comments for that issue 16:13:59 there were no objections, so when we get to those tickets, we will close them out with that approach 16:14:06 Topic: Business strategy includes accessibility as a market differentiator 16:14:24 #142 16:14:46 https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/issues/142 16:15:16 Lionel_Wolberger has joined #maturity 16:18:09 agreed to use the word "promoting" instead of marketing or advertising in the proof point that the language in the comment came from 16:18:28 3.7.1 Proof Points Culture proof points may include but are not limited to: Business strategy includes digital accessibility as market differentiator - add promoting 16:19:12 Sheri: we should review the document and replace any use of marketing or advertising with promoting. It's a better term, more of an umbrella 16:19:18 there were no objections 16:19:23 side note: search document for word "advertising" and change all to promoting 16:20:22 don't replace market (the noun) just marketing (the verb) 16:20:56 3.7.1 Proof Points Culture proof points may include but are not limited to: Business strategy includes digital accessibility as market differentiator - change to Business strategy includes promoting digital accessibility as market differentiator 16:21:28 https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/issues/18 16:22:32 This is a comment from Jason. We couldn't schedule a meeting with him before he went on an extended trip to Australia. We will review all of Jason's comments with Jason present towards the end of the year when he has returned 16:30:09 Lionel: we need to make sure we are highlighting our differentiators from our competitors 16:30:46 Lionel: it's about transformation, getting accessibility out of an IT silo and spreading it across the organization 16:30:56 Janina: everything has a web component 16:31:24 Lionel: Conformance with WCAG is mostly about code 16:32:17 Sheri: WCAG conformance is about getting a specific version of a specific product accessible, the maturity model is about everything that needs to be done to keep it accessible, which is about way more than code 16:33:21 https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/issues/138 16:33:31 #138 Topic: #138 Duplicated info? Knowledge and Skills seemed to be repeated with the maturity stages section 16:35:37 So the answer we ended up for in the draft is both: general K&S goes in K&S, specific knowledge for a dimension goes in the dimension so an example would be ARIA - only ICT folx need training in that, so it goes in ICT 16:35:51 Janina: that sounds good, did we explain that in the K&S section 16:35:56 Sheri: I don't think so 16:36:13 no objections to adding this information to K&S 16:36:30 scribe+ 16:36:50 Fazio: should not do spreadsheet items today 16:36:58 Sheri_B-H: need jeff for those 16:37:14 Fazio: looks for items not Jake identified ... 16:37:47 CharlesL: suggests #143 16:38:14 Knowledge and Skills includes information that is generic to accessibility across more than one dimension. If there is knowledge and skills specific to a single dimension, that proof point is included in the single dimension, not knowledge and skills. For example, knowledge of ARIA is specific to ICT, so it is included as an ICT proof point. Basic information on disability inclusion is generic and would be included in knowledge and skills. 16:38:40 +1 16:39:30 jlkline has joined #maturity 16:39:37 present+ 16:39:51 While this dimension includes proof points to be implemented at the organization level, knowledge and skills specific to each of the other dimensions should be included within their respective proof points, as appropriate. 16:40:24 leave that, add the example? 16:40:35 nadine: reads out current intro 16:40:47 hile this dimension includes proof points to be implemented at the organization level, knowledge and skills specific to each of the other dimensions should be included within their respective proof points, as appropriate. For example, knowledge of ARIA is specific to ICT, so it is included as an ICT proof point. Basic information on disability inclusion is generic and would be included in knowledge and skills. 16:40:50 Sheri_B-H: phps we only need the xample? 16:41:18 Sheri_B-H: add the example to the language already in the doc 16:42:39 Sheri_B-H: suggests tagging spreadsheet issues with a spreadsheet keyword, so we can schedule a spreadsheet specific call with jeff 16:42:40 David to create spreadsheet label, and tag those tickets for review at a meeting Jeff can attend 16:42:47 Sheri_B-H: suggests 6 December? 16:42:58 jeff: Yes 16:43:08 Label all spreadsheet issues and address them together with Jeff present 16:43:14 s/6/7/ 16:43:44 Sheri_B-H: behind on my todo's 16:43:57 CharlesL: when you catch up, Benetech can move forward, so thanks 16:44:41 jlkline: 2.4 no link to the template 16:44:49 Assessment Template link is missing 16:44:50 Sheri_B-H: thought we checked this with Roy 16:45:11 Sheri_B-H: it's a link, i just copied 16:45:14 https://www.w3.org/TR/maturity-model/ 16:45:30 Sheri_B-H: scroll to the bottom of 2.3 16:45:34 s/3/4/ 16:46:05 Sheri_B-H: phps have other references we should also turn into hyperlinks 16:46:24 2.4 Assessment Template 16:46:35 Make a copy of the https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/task-forces/research-questions/maturity-model/Overview.xlsx to get started. 16:46:35 16:46:41 jlkline: how will we work on it? 16:47:00 Sheri_B-H: i can put in a shared google sheet, then we can swap versions when we're happy with the edits 16:47:06 jlkline: formulas come across? 16:47:11 Sheri_B-H: Yes. I checked! 16:47:22 Sheri_B-H: Will send link to Google Sheet 16:48:21 CharlesL: suggests another sheet with just the worksheet values hdden? 16:48:25 Sheri_B-H: already done 16:49:42 agenda, next item 16:49:59 Janina: APA thinks we should be a task force, not a subgroup 16:50:11 Janina will provide a template for a work statement 16:50:26 Janina: we don't have to get a charter 16:50:59 Janina: that would give us a separate set of pages 16:51:09 Janina: Proposed name "Maturity Model Taskforce" 16:51:37 Review proposed work statement on Dec 14 16:53:00 Janina will send Sheri a template to put together a draft for Dec 14 review 16:54:02 rrsagent, make minutes 16:54:03 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/11/30-maturity-minutes.html Sheri_B-H 16:56:23 CharlesL has left #maturity 19:06:23 janina has left #maturity