12:34:41 RRSAgent has joined #rqtf 12:34:41 logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/10/19-rqtf-irc 12:35:22 zakim, clear agenda 12:40:35 agenda+ Collaboration Accessibility User requirements. 12:41:45 agenda+ Accessibility of digital wallets: exploring the issue. 12:42:34 agenda+ Miscellaneous topics. 12:43:36 chair: Scott_h 12:44:27 agenda? 12:46:36 zakim, clear agenda 12:55:35 janina has joined #rqtf 12:55:49 zakim, who's here? 12:55:58 Zakim has joined #rqtf 12:56:03 zakim, start meeting 12:56:03 RRSAgent, make logs Public 12:56:04 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), janina 12:56:15 Meeting: RQTF Teleconference 12:56:21 Date: 19 Oct 2022 12:56:26 Chair: Scott 12:56:28 agenda? 12:57:07 agenda+ Collaboration Accessibility User requirements. 12:57:20 agenda+ Accessibility of digital wallets: exploring the issue. 12:57:32 agenda+ Miscellaneous topics. 12:58:43 present+ 12:59:32 Lionel_Wolberger has joined #rqtf 13:01:37 SteveNoble has joined #rqtf 13:02:36 agenda? 13:02:37 Roy has joined #rqtf 13:02:45 present+ 13:02:49 present+ 13:02:49 present+ 13:02:55 open agendum 13:03:02 scribe: scott_h 13:03:12 scribe: SteveNoble 13:03:36 open agendum 1 13:04:25 janina: We agreed to issue a CfC - open until Oct 21 13:04:54 janina: We wanted to get this out so we can get comments over our meeting break 13:05:46 Raja_Kushalnagar has joined #rqtf 13:07:13 janina: We want to elicit lots of comments, which is why we are publishing now 13:09:48 AndroUser has joined #rqtf 13:10:38 The text: 13:10:38 One known area where feedback is needed and expected is how collaboration tools can support people with cognitive and learning disability. 13:10:44 The W3C Cognitive and Learning disability taskforce (COGA) is actively reviewing this draft, and is expected to provide feedback for incorporation in a future draft of this document based on their work in this area. An early view of COGA input to this document is available at [URI of wiki page]. 13:10:46 present+ 13:10:53 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa-admin/2022Oct/0014.html 13:11:36 janina: APA expects consensus, but non unanimous agreement 13:11:59 Joshue108_ has joined #rqtf 13:12:09 present+ 13:12:11 janina: We still don't have many votes at all, and need more positive notes 13:13:49 q+ 13:15:10 scott_h: We really need more information for improving the current draft, so I think publishing what we have so far and eliciting more comments is good 13:16:32 Lionel_Wolberger: It doesn't seem as though the feedback thus far is against publishing, just that more comments are needed 13:16:59 janina: That may not be completely true 13:18:47 janina: There are different opinions among some groups as to when documents should be published -- some groups like APA encourage frequent updating of documents 13:18:48 +1 to Janina's clarifying the different publication philosophies between APA and AGWG. 13:20:53 janina: This is why we encourage prepublication input 13:25:22 janina: AGWG promotes a stricter control philosophy on publication of documents, as opposed to APA; so some conflicts occur at times based on these differing publication philosophy 13:26:47 scott_h: We have found that Google Docs is hard to use in Windows, but better on iOS with VoiceOver 13:28:12 janina: We could create a snapshot in GitHub and replicate that in Google Docs and get comments from both 13:29:46 janina: Some concerns about needing the same structure in Google Docs as we do in GitHub 13:30:23 scott_h: Support looking at the Google Docs snapshot concept as a possibility 13:30:35 open agendum 2 13:30:36 janina: This seems a reasonable path formward 13:31:30 janina: We need to get up to speed on this technology 13:31:39 present+ 13:31:47 janina: We asked where we should start reading 13:32:37 janina: have not been given a good starting point so far 13:34:36 Lionel_Wolberger: Commercial providers may have requirements that we can review 13:35:22 janina: Perhaps we can just try out some of these digital wallets and see what access issues are found 13:37:14 janina: Not only do we want to see how digital wallets are currently implemented, but look at how personal accessibility settings propagate into other environments 13:37:43 Do you have a good meta review article on digital wallets? 13:38:05 A sample provider of a DID and Verifiable Credential wallet, https://www.dock.io/post/verifiable-credentials 13:39:18 q? 13:39:40 janina: another area is to have it become a provider of documents such as a power of attorney - how to move these from paper documents to accessible digital wallets 13:42:22 janina: Question to Raja about background information on having recorded (audio, video) documents counting legally as valid 13:42:31 +1 to wallet accessibility 13:42:43 Raja_Kushalnagar: Yes...will send out something about this 13:42:51 open agendum 3 13:43:15 scott_h: Next week is out last actual meeting 13:43:31 janina has left #rqtf 13:43:57 scott_h: No meetings in November or December 13:44:35 scott_h: Starting January 5 we resume the same Wednesday schedule as before 13:45:30 SteveNoble_ has joined #rqtf 13:45:45 AndroUser has joined #rqtf 13:45:52 scribe: SteveNoble_ 13:47:23 janina: A lot of what we look at is academic research, which is often behind paywalls 13:48:35 scott_h: I have access to journals, so will continue to be able to access these 13:49:43 scott_h: It is just mostly that there have not been a lot of articles published which go beyond blindness accessibility issues 13:51:22 scott_h: Have confidence in our process thus far 13:52:36 janina: Another source for background terminology is to look at the FAST docuement 13:55:06 I also have access to journals, but it is mostly the time issue; but I do hope to have more time in the next few months 13:56:47 trackbot, end meeting 13:56:47 Zakim, list attendees 13:56:47 As of this point the attendees have been janina, Roy, SteveNoble, Lionel_Wolberger, AndroUser, Joshue108_, scott_h 13:56:55 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 13:56:55 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/10/19-rqtf-minutes.html trackbot 13:56:56 RRSAgent, bye 13:56:56 I see no action items