Meeting minutes
cd
clear
Collaboration Accessibility User requirements.
jasonjgw: We gave the collaboration doc an extra week
janina: Happy with it - more feedback would be good, though
jasonjgw: Next step??
janina: Should be fine to do a CfC
janina: Need to decide the timing
janina: Mid December for comments?
<jasonjgw> https://
janina: We need to change the title of the document - others do not like CAUR
janina: The current name is a publication blocker
MichaelC: Confirm that keeping the current name will delay things
janina: Probably becomes "Collaboration tools..."
<janina> DRAFT RESOLUTION: RQTF requests APA conduct a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish Collaboration Tools Accessibility User Requirements as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD).
jasonjgw: Pushing the resolution to next week would give us more time to deal with retitling everything
janina: Pushing to next week for the resolution will not lose us much
jasonjgw: CTAUR becomes the short name
jasonjgw: I have a branch ready to go
MichaelC: You can push to main
<MichaelC> https://
<MichaelC> https://
DRAFT RESOLUTION: RQTF requests APA conduct a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish Collaboration Tools Accessibility User Requirements https://
RESOLUTION: RQTF requests APA conduct a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish Collaboration Tools Accessibility User Requirements https://
jasonjgw: Have some journal articles to add as citations, but have not had a chance to review these
jasonjgw: Anything else on this?
Accessibility of digital wallets: exploring the issue.
jasonjgw: Last week we talked about discussing with Verifiable Credentials - that has begun
janina: We are asking them to point us to where to begin our reading on digital wallets
janina: Things like setting a preference so that captions are always on in all devices
janina: At some point this becomes the basis for an accessible method of providing a durable power of attorney and such things in a digital evvironment
Raja_Kushalnagar: In the USA, to affix a video or recording will count as a legally binding documentation
Raja_Kushalnagar: Will send information about this on the listserv
jasonjgw: We are concerned about both physical and digital access needs (such as an interpreter needed)
jasonjgw: Would there be an easy way of making it easy to only divulge the amount of personal data that is needed to authorize whatever the interchange might be
janina: We are hoping that the discussion with Verifiable Credentials will lead to the answers to that question
jasonjgw: There is an existing literature base that we can begin with
janina: Main caution that we should be precise and narrow on what we ask for in the way of background
jasonjgw: Seem like two parts: 1) issues raised by various applications 2) address the accessibility issues
janina: In some cases, things like captions can be useful to a wide audience, so being cognizant of that would be good
Miscellaneous topics.
Raja_Kushalnagar: Do we have a link for the digital wallets discussion?
janina: Not yet...we are just starting the discussion