Meeting minutes
test report
PR 848
McCool: I just finish a PR which we can review
PR 848 - Update Implementation Report Oct 2022
<kaz> draft implementation report on "oct-2022-impl-rep-update" branch
<MM shows the result of the implementation report>
Report includes the results of node-wot
wot-testing PR 405
<kaz> PR 405 - add manual.csv for node-wot
McCool: the node-wot results look very conservative, I think more is possible with node-wot
<MM provide a comment in the PR from Daniel>
wot-testing PR 404
McCool: there is a PR from Toumura-san
wot-testing PR 404 - first reports for architecture assertions
McCool: going to merge it
wot-testing PR 374
McCool: there is a PR from TUM
wot-testing PR 374 - TUM manual.csv
Sebastian: Is this PR for Architecture?
<Sebastian guess its only for TD>
<MM generates new report based on the new PRs>
McCool: test results looks much better now. We have 4 implementations so far.
McCool: we have still 21 assertations with no implementations
<MM provides the new report to the Arch repo>
Minutes (2022-09-22)
McCool: I'm ok with the minutes
… objections?
no
Issues
McCool: there are two new issues
Update dates and further cleanup in Implementation report - Issue 846
<kaz> Issue 846 - Update dates and further cleanup in Implementation report
McCool: I can work on this
<MM assigns itself to the issue>
Update Security Link - Issue 841
<kaz> Issue 841 - Update Security Link
Sebastian: I worked on that, see https://
TAG-based issues
https://
McCool: some issues addresses the use case section. Maybe we should simply remove it since its only informative
Sebastian: On the other hand, we had this section already in the 1.0 version
Kaz: Given we still have five remaining issues on TAG's reviews, probably we should consider to invite them to our calls to have discussion. If we can resolve all issues quickly, that's fine, though.
<MM writes an email to Amy and Daniel of the TAG team and ask to join one of the next Arch call, if possible>
Other issues
<MM checks other issues such as labeld "by CR transition">
McCool: we should also add "by CR transition" to the TAG issues
… I will do this
[adjourned]