09:54:07 RRSAgent has joined #wot-arch 09:54:07 logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/09/29-wot-arch-irc 09:54:13 meeting: WoT Architecture 09:57:26 present+ Kaz_Ashimura 10:01:15 present+ Michael_McCool 10:01:19 Mizushima has joined #wot-arch 10:02:48 present+ Sebastian_Kaebisch, Tomoaki_Mizushima 10:03:05 regrets+ Lagally 10:05:28 chair: McCool 10:05:44 McCool has joined #wot-arch 10:06:01 sebastian has joined #wot-arch 10:06:30 topic: test report 10:06:42 scribenick: sebastian 10:06:59 MM: I just finish a PR which we can review 10:08:09 ktoumura has joined #wot-arch 10:09:31 present+ Kunihiko_Toumura 10:12:00 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/pull/848 10:13:17 topic: minutes 10:13:35 s/topic: minutes// 10:13:51 s/848/848 PR 848 - Update Implementation Report Oct 2022/ 10:14:06 10:14:39 Report includes the results of node-wot 10:16:27 i|MM shows|-> https://github.com/mmccool/wot-architecture/blob/oct-2022-impl-rep-update/testing/report11.html draft implementation report on "oct-2022-impl-rep-update" branch| 10:17:01 MM: the node-wot results looks very conservative, I think more is possible with node-wot 10:19:47 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/pull/405#issuecomment-1262073842 10:20:54 MM: there is a PR from Toumura-san 10:21:04 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/pull/404 10:21:21 MM: going to merge it 10:22:25 MM: there is a PR from TUM 10:22:36 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/pull/374 10:23:10 SK: Is this PR for Architecture? 10:23:23 rrsagent, make log public 10:23:27 rrsagent, draft minutes 10:23:27 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/09/29-wot-arch-minutes.html kaz 10:24:17 i/just finish/subtopic: PR 848/ 10:24:40 10:25:04 i/the node-wot results/subtopic: wot-testing PR 405/ 10:25:21 i/there is a PR from Tou/subtopic: wot-testing PR 404/ 10:25:34 10:25:38 i/there is a PR from TUM/subtopic: wot-testing PR 374/ 10:25:43 rrsagent, draft minutes 10:25:43 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/09/29-wot-arch-minutes.html kaz 10:26:00 MM: test results looks much better now. We have 4 implementations so far. 10:26:07 rrsagent, draft minutes 10:26:07 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/09/29-wot-arch-minutes.html kaz 10:27:03 MM: we have still 21 assertations with no implementations 10:27:10 s/the node-wot results looks/the node-wot results look/ 10:27:37 i|the node-wot results|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/pull/405 PR 405 - add manual.csv for node-wot| 10:28:24 s|404|404 wot-testing PR 404 - first reports for architecture assertions| 10:29:12 10:29:39 topic: Minutes (2022-09-22) 10:29:58 -> https://www.w3.org/2022/09/22-wot-arch-minutes.html 10:30:20 s|374|374 wot-testing PR 374 - TUM manual.csv| 10:30:33 s/html/html Sep-22/ 10:30:37 rrsagent, draft minutes 10:30:37 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/09/29-wot-arch-minutes.html kaz 10:31:30 MM: I'm ok with the minutes 10:31:36 ... objections? 10:31:37 no 10:33:05 topic: Issues 10:33:20 MM: there are two new issues 10:33:57 subtopic: Update dates and further cleanup in Implementation report - Issue 846 10:34:07 MM: I can work on this 10:34:45 10:34:53 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues/846 10:35:01 i|I can|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues/846 Issue 846 - Update dates and further cleanup in Implementation report| 10:35:20 s|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues/846|| 10:35:39 subtopic: Update Security Link - Issue 841 10:36:01 SK: I worked on that, see https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/pull/847 10:36:11 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/pull/847 10:36:35 i|worked on|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues/841 Issue 841 - Update Security Link| 10:36:47 s|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/pull/847|| 10:37:02 q+ 10:38:11 subtopic: TAG based issues 10:38:43 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Atag-needs-resolution 10:39:00 s/TAG based/TAG-based/ 10:39:36 MM: some issues addresses the use case section. Maybe we should simple remove it since its only informative 10:39:52 s/simple/simply/ 10:39:58 SK: Otherhand, we had this section already in the 1.0 version 10:40:44 Kaz: we should think about to inviting TAG representants to talk about those 5 issues 10:40:59 s/inviting/invite 10:42:20 s/we should think about to inviting TAG representants to talk about those 5 issues/Given we still have five remaining issues on TAG's reviews, probably we should consider to invite them to our calls to have discussion. If we can resolve all issues quickly, that's fine, though./ 10:43:29 s/Otherhand/On the other hand/ 10:44:05 rrsagent, draft minutes 10:44:05 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/09/29-wot-arch-minutes.html kaz 10:44:58 s/we should think about to invite TAG representants to talk about those 5 issues/Given we still have five remaining issues on TAG's reviews, probably we should consider to invite them to our calls to have discussion. If we can resolve all issues quickly, that's fine, though./ 10:45:01 rrsagent, draft minutes 10:45:01 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/09/29-wot-arch-minutes.html kaz 10:47:10 10:49:51 subtopic: Other issues 10:50:34 10:51:12 MM: we should also add "by CR transition" to the TAG issues 10:51:19 ... I will do this 10:53:55 adjourn2 10:54:03 s/adjourn2/adjourn 10:54:13 s/adjourn/[adjourned]/ 10:54:16 rrsagent, draft minutes 10:54:16 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/09/29-wot-arch-minutes.html kaz 11:14:35 ktoumura has left #wot-arch 12:59:48 Zakim has left #wot-arch 13:50:04 kaz has joined #wot-arch 14:37:56 kaz has joined #wot-arch