14:08:57 RRSAgent has joined #trusted-internet 14:08:57 logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/09/14-trusted-internet-irc 14:08:59 Zakim has joined #trusted-internet 14:14:04 Meeting: Trusted Internet - TPAC 2022 breakout 14:14:06 Chair: Takuya_Sakamoto, Shigeya_Suzuki 14:14:08 Agenda: https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/505c7741-69d4-4d87-b4a9-21dcefd0bbf9#agenda 14:14:10 RRSAgent, make log public 14:14:12 RRSAgent, this meeting spans midnight 14:18:42 RRSAgent, stay 14:18:46 Zakim, stay 14:18:46 I don't understand 'stay', dom 15:14:58 dom has joined #trusted-internet 16:13:17 agenda+ breakout 18:15:49 dom has joined #trusted-internet 20:15:05 dom has joined #trusted-internet 20:30:10 dom has joined #trusted-internet 21:07:02 dom__ has joined #trusted-internet 21:52:59 dom has joined #trusted-internet 22:44:24 Jay has joined #trusted-internet 22:46:23 zakim, start meeting 22:46:23 RRSAgent, make logs Public 22:46:24 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), Jay 22:47:10 meeting: Trusted Iinternet 22:53:53 ryuichi has joined #trusted-internet 23:03:54 koji_ has joined #trusted-internet 23:13:56 koji_ has joined #trusted-internet 23:14:03 Jay has joined #trusted-internet 23:14:41 koji__ has joined #trusted-internet 23:15:08 present+ 23:15:47 chair: takuya 23:16:13 quit 23:21:02 gendler has joined #trusted-internet 23:21:05 Present+ 23:22:25 dom has joined #trusted-internet 23:23:27 koji_ has joined #trusted-internet 23:26:23 ken has joined #trusted-internet 23:26:40 ryuichi_ has joined #trusted-internet 23:31:01 annette_g_ has joined #trusted-internet 23:31:28 bmay has joined #trusted-internet 23:31:41 nimura has joined #trusted-internet 23:31:57 scribe: jay 23:32:17 [slide description] 23:32:55 osamu: slide 5 [project and related works on data architecture] 23:33:40 ... the back ground of this talk 23:34:05 ... we need your voice on this presentation. 23:34:55 takuya: after the talk on my presentation, please give us your opinion. 23:35:14 Bert has joined #trusted-internet 23:35:27 Naohiro has joined #trusted-internet 23:35:52 chike has joined #trusted-internet 23:36:02 ... [self introduction] 23:37:51 ... [slides description] 23:38:16 JonathanHao has joined #trusted-internet 23:38:28 dhuigens has joined #trusted-internet 23:38:33 ... slide 4: issue to confirm the credebility 23:38:56 ... slide 5: trust in business 23:39:14 brentz has joined #trusted-internet 23:39:21 ... building the trustworthy 23:39:33 Geun_Hyung has joined #trusted-internet 23:39:54 present+ Geun-Hyung Kim 23:40:27 ... slide 6: our approach is checking by physical world 23:40:39 present+ 23:40:54 present+ 23:41:07 present+ shigeya 23:41:38 ... slide 7: architecture with three endorsement layers 23:44:11 please share the link of present material.. 23:44:32 ... slide 8: Endorsement graph/flow of each data 23:45:58 ... slide 9: endorsement graph generation, with each attribution data 23:46:19 ... slide 10: presentation description 23:47:19 ... slide 11: conclusions 23:48:24 ... slide 12: discussion points, use cases,stakeholders, ecosystem 23:48:46 takashi_ has joined #trusted-internet 23:49:40 lgombos_____ has joined #trusted-internet 23:50:07 q+ 23:51:12 gendier: trust we handle many years. two main concers 23:51:52 q+ 23:51:59 ... trust signal individual involved. makes difficult problem 23:53:09 ... 2nd is technology point, TXT score of trust. big problem is bad score coming 23:53:20 ... do you have any solution? 23:53:43 q+ 23:54:01 q+ 23:54:15 takuya: trust list is not easy to make 23:54:56 JonathanHao has joined #trusted-internet 23:55:12 ... so usually social media, people will not expose much data. 23:55:24 ack gendler 23:55:27 ack gend 23:55:49 q+ 23:55:59 q+ to ask about levels of endorsements: can I endorse something partially, e.g., to say I believe it is 50% true, or that, if an article claims something is A out of A, B and C, I know that at least it is not C? 23:56:22 takuya has joined #trusted-internet 23:56:34 jonathan: use case.. 23:56:51 SarahHeimlich has joined #trusted-internet 23:56:55 ack brentz 23:57:22 JonathanHao_ has joined #trusted-internet 23:57:36 brentz: trust over internet has similar problem, do you know? 23:57:38 nina has joined #trusted-internet 23:57:40 Kodajima has joined #trusted-internet 23:58:15 takuya: our main characteristic is endorsement layer. 23:58:56 ... ACDC will help 23:59:14 ack annette_g_ 23:59:18 Trust over ip: https://trustoverip.org/ 23:59:57 annett: our community group also discussing on trusted TXT assigning score. 00:00:32 ... please check web site entity. little bit issue with scoring people. 00:01:08 s/annett:/annette:/ 00:01:22 ... endorser should has reliable source 00:01:59 q+ to clarify my comments on trust.txt 00:02:09 q? 00:03:16 takuya: this solution is adding endorsemnet, and define data model etc. 00:03:36 ack bmay 00:03:36 q+ 00:04:18 bmay: can I trust the integrity? next level can I trust of orgin of signal. 00:05:07 ... easy path of signal, more trustworthy path. question is trust and cofidentiality 00:05:20 sami has joined #trusted-internet 00:05:56 ... believe of privacy, graph of endorsement, becoming social issue. 00:06:00 +1 to bmay statement on privacy 00:06:34 takuya: this solution is signed data. it is not easy real trustness. 00:06:42 ack bmay 00:07:08 osamu: our proposal model is current internet. 00:08:47 ... mashup the verifiable data is our approach. more trustable will recognize with plural data 00:10:06 shigeya: I am co-chair. we want have ultimate solution. but at least, verifiable data, distiguished data. 00:10:37 ... we can one step up by our approach. 00:10:47 ack dhuigens 00:11:37 dhuigens: according to your presentation, assueme web App run correctly. 00:12:38 ... security model now . VC at web app is not good. do you agree? 00:13:18 osamu: of course, we need some end-point trust. which rely on other, we focus 00:13:28 s/assueme/we assume the 00:13:37 ... it si now out of course, requirement is our scope. 00:13:40 ack bert 00:13:40 Bert, you wanted to ask about levels of endorsements: can I endorse something partially, e.g., to say I believe it is 50% true, or that, if an article claims something is A out of 00:13:43 ... A, B and C, I know that at least it is not C? 00:14:31 Bert: partial and negative endorsement. ex covid 80%. could realized? 00:14:46 takuya: data model is very difficly. 00:15:18 ... this is not easy problem. but need to do it. 00:15:29 q+ 00:16:11 osamu: evalution metric is always problem. on the contrary, how we can disign is our part. 00:16:16 ack gendler 00:16:16 gendler, you wanted to clarify my comments on trust.txt 00:17:21 gendler: base system is the relationship between two. which base on trust TXT. 00:17:31 takuya; what is TXT? 00:18:20 gendler: JSON document, technicaly machine readable domain 00:18:26 s/covid/endorse 00:18:36 s/difficly/difficult 00:18:55 s/disign/design 00:19:47 osamu: I need originator profil led by Keio univ on advertisement. Trust of two party is described there. 00:19:56 To clarify the notes about my comments: I pointed out that trust.txt does not issue scores. It simply enables entities to state relationships with other entities. I also mentioned that the proposed system has two issues; first it does rely on endorsers being trustworthy (which is different from simply identifying itself), and second it requires identification of relevant endorsers for a given message, and it's not clear to me how[CUT] 00:20:51 Originator Profile Project: https://originator-profile.pages.dev/en-US/ 00:21:42 ken: general comment. need more use cases. it will easy to understand. for example fake news. 00:21:51 ack ken 00:22:40 ... to help to concrete idea such as model. generic study only is not good approach. 00:23:06 Annette; I'm sorry I didn't properly address your latter points! I would agree with them entirely. They try to offload this to the economic incentives of trade associations to curate their members properly for trust, but that was overly optimistic in my estimation as well! 00:24:17 takuya: we will select harmful example for W3C. scoring is useful for viewer. 00:24:21 q? 00:25:25 ack bmay 00:25:49 takuya: thank you for your help on discussion. 00:27:07 @@: use case my sense high/law, people's understanding is very different each. this is not good for trustworthy 00:27:41 takuya: incentive is required fo chekc their honestness. 00:28:56 kojima: should we connect/divide both opinion? 00:29:19 @@@: this is not technical problem. 00:30:01 osamu: please introduction of trusted-web 00:31:09 shigeya: our trying on trusted web is extend the trusted data. if we extend our trusted data, it will ehlp gap. 00:32:32 ... we need effort to fill this gap. we found organization has various document in terms of veifiable. Area of trust is much mor easy for everyone. 00:32:32 s/fo chekc their honestness/to check their honesty. 00:33:06 s|high/law|of high/low 00:33:22 ... this is a multi-year project. now we issue Japanese version in August. English version isll come soon. 00:33:43 s/veifiable/verifiable 00:33:58 s/isll/will 00:34:08 [adjourned] 00:35:14 RRSAgent, make minutes 00:35:14 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/09/14-trusted-internet-minutes.html Bert 00:35:50 quit 00:59:34 koji__ has joined #trusted-internet 00:59:47 quit 01:18:02 Jay has joined #trusted-internet 14:45:37 Bert has left #trusted-internet 21:14:55 dom has joined #trusted-internet 22:02:41 RRSAgent, bye 22:02:41 I see no action items