W3C

– DRAFT –
(MEETING TITLE)

12 September 2022

Attendees

Present
acimmino, beatriz_esteves, GabrielHuecas, Jcano, Nicoletta, Shoeil_R, victor
Regrets
-
Chair
-
Scribe
@victor, victor

Meeting minutes

this meeting is ODRL at TPAC

Gabriel: participation in Fiware, GaiaX, slow development

Andrea: EU funded project AURORAL

Juan: In Andrea's team

Nicoletta: formal model to check compliance to ODRL policy

Nicoletta: temporal evolution of state of policies.

Soheil: PhD student supervised by Nicoletta, working as a team

scribe @victor

<victor> Beatriz: PhD student at UPM

<victor> Beatriz: Future ODRL needs Formal semantics

<victor> Gabriel: +1

<victor> Andrea: validation, conformance, compliance, standard behaviour on certain policies

<victor> Soheil: odrl represent actions as classes

<victor> Nicoletta: There are different use cases, very different. Survey of uses would be of interest.

<victor> Nicoletta: I am interested if there has been IN THE PAST a violation; Access Control is slightly different, because violations cannot happen.

<victor> Nicoletta: documentation must answer the question "how can ODRL be used?"

<victor> Nicoletta: https://github.com/w3c/odrl/blob/master/formal-semantics/Compliance%20checking%20ODRL%20policies.md

<victor> Victor: presents history of odrl

<victor> Victor: on the convenience of having regular meeting, or how to continue

<victor> victor: need to define software artifacts and their behaviours, test beds, conformance

<victor> Andrea: equivalent tests were made in the IoT system

<victor> https://www.w3.org/participate/implementation

<victor> Nicoletta: we have two tasks ahead, describing the representation and implementing the behaviour.

<victor> Victor: current specs are still poor https://w3c.github.io/odrl/formal-semantics/

<victor> Victor: we need the help of others

<victor> Piero Bonatti https://www.docenti.unina.it/webdocenti-be/allegati/contenuti/1487368

<victor> Victor: but we need further development

<victor> Nicoletta: ok, lets meet again, but action on Beatriz to describe the Access Control scenario

<victor> Nicoletta which is not the same as the Policy Monitoring scenario

<victor> Andrea: presents some slides

<victor> Andrea: AURORAL project. (see slides)

<victor> Soheil: is there any blockchain in here?

<victor> Andra: no, there isnt, this would be a different use case.

<victor> Nicoletta: in some cases strict access control is not the best choice

<victor> Nicoletta: for example access control to medical records, may save lives if the official permission system is overriden in case of emergency

<victor> Nicoletta: violations are in some situations very useful!

<victor> Nicoletta: congrats for your presentation

ACTION: to create new use cases

RESOLUTION: next Formal Semantics meeting after this progress has been verified

<victor> end this meeting

Summary of action items

  1. to create new use cases

Summary of resolutions

  1. next Formal Semantics meeting after this progress has been verified
Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by scribe.perl version 192 (Tue Jun 28 16:55:30 2022 UTC).

Diagnostics

Maybe present: Andrea, Gabriel, Juan, Soheil