IRC log of wcag3-scoring on 2022-08-31

Timestamps are in UTC.

14:50:14 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #wcag3-scoring
14:50:14 [RRSAgent]
logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/08/31-wcag3-scoring-irc
14:50:21 [Francis_Storr]
zakim, start meeting
14:50:21 [Zakim]
RRSAgent, make logs Public
14:50:22 [Zakim]
please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), Francis_Storr
14:50:37 [Francis_Storr]
meeting: issue severity subgroup week 7
14:50:45 [Francis_Storr]
rrsagent, make logs world
14:50:48 [Francis_Storr]
present+
15:00:20 [ShawnT]
ShawnT has joined #wcag3-scoring
15:00:37 [ShawnT]
present+
15:05:21 [alastairc]
agenda?
15:05:29 [ToddL]
ToddL has joined #wcag3-scoring
15:05:35 [Francis_Storr]
Francis_Storr has joined #wcag3-scoring
15:05:35 [alastairc]
TOPIC: What goes in the PR
15:05:39 [sarahhorton]
sarahhorton has joined #wcag3-scoring
15:05:44 [shadi]
shadi has joined #wcag3-scoring
15:05:48 [ToddL]
present+
15:06:10 [shadi]
present+
15:06:16 [sarahhorton]
present+
15:07:16 [alastairc]
ShawnT: We worked on the spreadsheet, decided to list out the user-needs for each category. Decided that we'd put the functional needs as th headings, and what level deep we should go?
15:07:33 [alastairc]
... find out what critical needs go there, and what user-needs should go in the cells.
15:07:41 [alastairc]
... I listed all of them from the doc.
15:08:34 [alastairc]
... created full reference from the doc in a sheet.
15:08:42 [alastairc]
... Sarah did the functional needs.
15:09:06 [alastairc]
sarahhorton: I made a sheet for the func needs categories. Started by grouping them.
15:09:30 [alastairc]
... took the ~50 func needs, but still lots to talk through.
15:09:38 [alastairc]
... those would become col headers on the crit needs sheet.
15:10:01 [alastairc]
... also took all the tests from the editor's draft that made sense for discrete tasks.
15:10:22 [alastairc]
... Shawn thought we should setup the framework, some of the work at TPAC could be to fill out the user needs.
15:10:43 [alastairc]
... we focused on critical, but this could serve as a way of doing the other levels.
15:11:01 [alastairc]
... so this is setup for the group to take forward.
15:11:39 [alastairc]
... Trying to show how it builds on existing content. so this is a framework for exploring the concept, using the content developered for WCAG 3.0
15:11:56 [alastairc]
ShawnT: Keeping in mind that some of the needs may change.
15:12:56 [alastairc]
alastairc: Question for me is then, how would we propose that it's used?
15:14:17 [alastairc]
sarahhorton: We have notes on that.
15:14:18 [alastairc]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/138l-fn_JuKl_lOX90JhywLbz9BK1KmjlLLyUjkoouyM/edit#
15:14:29 [alastairc]
... also, 2 presentations seemed to be relevant.
15:14:37 [alastairc]
... equity, and test-types.
15:14:54 [alastairc]
... if we have multiple test-types, and severity in each, we'll need to account for that.
15:15:01 [alastairc]
Francis_Storr: We'd need to account for that?
15:15:45 [alastairc]
sarahhorton: The tests in column A here, are what Wilco proposed as computational, maybe qualitative. There were additional ones (e.g. adaptive), so we'll need to consider how that affects the ranking / severity.
15:17:15 [alastairc]
... Clear words has some extended tests. those are the ones I could draw from the editor's draft.
15:17:48 [alastairc]
ShawnT: Thought we could go through some of the sheet at TPAC. E.g. get people involved to see if the ratings are good, if the metholody works.
15:18:08 [alastairc]
s/metholody/methodology
15:18:50 [alastairc]
... could spend an hour with a bunch of people to work on that.
15:19:15 [alastairc]
Francis_Storr: That sounds interesting.
15:28:45 [sarahhorton_]
sarahhorton_ has joined #wcag3-scoring
16:06:00 [Francis_Storr]
rrsagent, generate minutes
16:06:00 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/08/31-wcag3-scoring-minutes.html Francis_Storr
17:10:35 [Zakim]
Zakim has left #wcag3-scoring