14:50:14 RRSAgent has joined #wcag3-scoring 14:50:14 logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/08/31-wcag3-scoring-irc 14:50:21 zakim, start meeting 14:50:21 RRSAgent, make logs Public 14:50:22 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), Francis_Storr 14:50:37 meeting: issue severity subgroup week 7 14:50:45 rrsagent, make logs world 14:50:48 present+ 15:00:20 ShawnT has joined #wcag3-scoring 15:00:37 present+ 15:05:21 agenda? 15:05:29 ToddL has joined #wcag3-scoring 15:05:35 Francis_Storr has joined #wcag3-scoring 15:05:35 TOPIC: What goes in the PR 15:05:39 sarahhorton has joined #wcag3-scoring 15:05:44 shadi has joined #wcag3-scoring 15:05:48 present+ 15:06:10 present+ 15:06:16 present+ 15:07:16 ShawnT: We worked on the spreadsheet, decided to list out the user-needs for each category. Decided that we'd put the functional needs as th headings, and what level deep we should go? 15:07:33 ... find out what critical needs go there, and what user-needs should go in the cells. 15:07:41 ... I listed all of them from the doc. 15:08:34 ... created full reference from the doc in a sheet. 15:08:42 ... Sarah did the functional needs. 15:09:06 sarahhorton: I made a sheet for the func needs categories. Started by grouping them. 15:09:30 ... took the ~50 func needs, but still lots to talk through. 15:09:38 ... those would become col headers on the crit needs sheet. 15:10:01 ... also took all the tests from the editor's draft that made sense for discrete tasks. 15:10:22 ... Shawn thought we should setup the framework, some of the work at TPAC could be to fill out the user needs. 15:10:43 ... we focused on critical, but this could serve as a way of doing the other levels. 15:11:01 ... so this is setup for the group to take forward. 15:11:39 ... Trying to show how it builds on existing content. so this is a framework for exploring the concept, using the content developered for WCAG 3.0 15:11:56 ShawnT: Keeping in mind that some of the needs may change. 15:12:56 alastairc: Question for me is then, how would we propose that it's used? 15:14:17 sarahhorton: We have notes on that. 15:14:18 https://docs.google.com/document/d/138l-fn_JuKl_lOX90JhywLbz9BK1KmjlLLyUjkoouyM/edit# 15:14:29 ... also, 2 presentations seemed to be relevant. 15:14:37 ... equity, and test-types. 15:14:54 ... if we have multiple test-types, and severity in each, we'll need to account for that. 15:15:01 Francis_Storr: We'd need to account for that? 15:15:45 sarahhorton: The tests in column A here, are what Wilco proposed as computational, maybe qualitative. There were additional ones (e.g. adaptive), so we'll need to consider how that affects the ranking / severity. 15:17:15 ... Clear words has some extended tests. those are the ones I could draw from the editor's draft. 15:17:48 ShawnT: Thought we could go through some of the sheet at TPAC. E.g. get people involved to see if the ratings are good, if the metholody works. 15:18:08 s/metholody/methodology 15:18:50 ... could spend an hour with a bunch of people to work on that. 15:19:15 Francis_Storr: That sounds interesting. 15:28:45 sarahhorton_ has joined #wcag3-scoring 16:06:00 rrsagent, generate minutes 16:06:00 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/08/31-wcag3-scoring-minutes.html Francis_Storr 17:10:35 Zakim has left #wcag3-scoring