IRC log of wot-marketing on 2022-08-16

Timestamps are in UTC.

11:02:12 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #wot-marketing
11:02:12 [RRSAgent]
logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/08/16-wot-marketing-irc
11:02:38 [Ege]
Ege has joined #wot-marketing
11:03:21 [Mizushima]
Mizushima has joined #wot-marketing
11:03:37 [kaz]
meeting: WoT Marketing
11:03:41 [kaz]
chair: Ege
11:03:51 [kaz]
present+ Kaz_Ashimura, Ege_Korkan
11:05:59 [kaz]
present+ Tomoaki_Mizushima
11:06:40 [kaz]
present+ Michael_McCool
11:06:55 [McCool]
McCool has joined #wot-marketing
11:08:42 [kaz]
agenda: https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Marketing_WebConf#August_16.2C_2022
11:09:01 [McCool]
topic: minutes
11:09:16 [McCool]
ege: review minutes of Aug 9
11:09:26 [kaz]
i|review|-> https://www.w3.org/2022/08/09-wot-marketing-minutes.html Aug-9|
11:10:29 [McCool]
... again, would like to expand the initials
11:10:38 [McCool]
kaz: will also add your name to the chairs
11:11:10 [McCool]
ege: otherwise looks good, if no objections can publish after fixes
11:11:13 [McCool]
... no objections
11:11:21 [McCool]
topic: PRs
11:11:28 [McCool]
subtopic: PR #336
11:11:36 [McCool]
ege: history of standardization
11:12:12 [McCool]
... some feedback: pictures, second workshop
11:13:12 [McCool]
... made some edits, added some pictures
11:13:23 [kaz]
q+
11:13:47 [McCool]
... however, need to find pictures, workshop
11:14:49 [McCool]
kaz: will dig into webserver but will take some time
11:15:28 [McCool]
mm: would be better to archive pictures somewhere we can access, so we solve this problem once
11:15:51 [McCool]
kaz: when do you need them by?
11:16:53 [McCool]
mm: I would also like to do an editorial pass, so at least a couple of weeks
11:17:06 [McCool]
ege: can look at it again at the end of Aug/TPAC
11:17:40 [kaz]
q+
11:18:17 [McCool]
ege: unfortunately most pictures don't show any women
11:18:43 [McCool]
mm: true, but we could use the shot showing the entire audience of the second workshop
11:19:06 [McCool]
kaz: also a space problem with pictures
11:19:19 [McCool]
ege: right, if put in github will blow up the repo
11:19:45 [McCool]
kaz: maybe can just store the links, eg. and index page, in the repo
11:19:57 [McCool]
subtopic: Pr #331
11:20:02 [kaz]
ack k
11:20:11 [kaz]
rrsagent, make log public
11:20:16 [kaz]
rrsagent, draft minutes
11:20:16 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/08/16-wot-marketing-minutes.html kaz
11:20:24 [McCool]
ege: about reorganizing explainers, made a checklist last time, worked through
11:20:32 [McCool]
... so there is a new draft
11:21:27 [McCool]
... now explainers are linked, but titled as explainers
11:22:03 [McCool]
mm: only TD 1.1, do we wait for discovery?
11:22:48 [McCool]
ege: would like to merge this now, do discovery later
11:22:53 [kaz]
i|ege: history of standardization|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/pull/336 PR 336 - Adding History of the Standardization|
11:22:55 [McCool]
... let me create an issue
11:23:03 [kaz]
rrsagent, draft minutes
11:23:03 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/08/16-wot-marketing-minutes.html kaz
11:23:04 [Ege]
q?
11:23:32 [McCool]
mm: ok let's merge
11:23:46 [Ege]
https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/338
11:23:54 [McCool]
ege: (merged)
11:23:57 [kaz]
i|ege: about reorganizing explainers, made a checklist last time, worked through|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/pull/331 PR 331 - Move Explainer to Marketing repo|
11:24:03 [McCool]
topic: issues
11:24:05 [kaz]
s/https/-> https/
11:24:12 [McCool]
subtopic: issue #329
11:24:27 [McCool]
ege: json schema case study; draft of case study, under review
11:24:38 [kaz]
s/338/338 Issue 338 - Add Discovery Explainer/
11:24:53 [McCool]
topic: IG-CG discussion
11:25:13 [McCool]
ege: don't plan to do this every week, maybe biweekly or once a month
11:25:33 [McCool]
... propose starting Sept 6 but that is TPAC pre-meeting, people will be busy
11:25:46 [kaz]
q+
11:26:29 [McCool]
mm: might be ok to have it in pre-TPAC if include discussion of next WG charter items
11:26:47 [kaz]
i|ege: json schema case study;|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/329 Issue 329 - JSON Schema Case Study|
11:27:41 [McCool]
mm: seeking input on priorities and use cases
11:28:06 [McCool]
kaz: as staff, most important point is clarifying responsibilities of each group
11:28:43 [McCool]
... don't think we should continue this discussion, and make final decision about responsibilities
11:29:03 [McCool]
ege: you mean responsibilities that CG should take?
11:29:34 [McCool]
kaz: for example, don't necessarily need wot-marketing TF after CG starts
11:30:58 [McCool]
mm: need to get a clear resolution
11:31:55 [McCool]
ege: agree, but don't understand exact first step to take
11:35:24 [McCool]
... don't know where resolution should go
11:37:55 [McCool]
mm: suggest create issue in wot repo, draft a resolution, schedule time to discuss in TPAC pre-meeting, in the meantime label issue in wot-marketing
11:38:11 [McCool]
ege: propose to create an issue right now then
11:40:33 [McCool]
mm: need to capture and resolve some sticking points, e.g. distinguishing official WG/IG anouncements from CG material
11:40:59 [McCool]
... we just need a policy
11:41:25 [McCool]
kaz: and from current pages, need to figure out which are managed by which group
11:42:20 [McCool]
... just creating github issues is not enough, need a draft policy
11:42:53 [McCool]
... maybe a diagram, listing of pages
11:43:41 [McCool]
... locations and types of content
11:44:41 [McCool]
mm: want to make sure the directory structure is clear
11:45:37 [McCool]
ege: if move repo, will have to update web site redirection as well
11:45:51 [McCool]
mm: that should not be a problem, the wot-marketing name is troublesome anyway
11:46:17 [McCool]
kaz: also need to talk to W3M about publishing responsibilities, etc.
11:46:48 [McCool]
ege: don't understand exact issues here...
11:46:58 [McCool]
kaz: we did discuss it before
11:49:26 [McCool]
... may need to have another call about process
11:49:45 [McCool]
mm: we really just need exact steps to go from here to there
11:50:27 [McCool]
ege: get the feeling the previous discussion was not clear; who has the work, what needs to be done?
11:50:46 [McCool]
kaz: before creating detailed issues and PRs, need design and policy
11:51:13 [McCool]
ege: so where do we write that content if we don't use github?
11:51:58 [McCool]
... I felt in particular that we have already clarified our expectations
11:52:22 [McCool]
kaz: which group is responsible for what resources
11:55:27 [McCool]
mm: still feel we should use the wot repo to organize a resolution, at least for the IG/WG resolution
11:55:45 [McCool]
... but some homework needs to be done to consolidate prior discussion
11:56:28 [McCool]
kaz: there are also multiple groups now, including Japanese WoT CG, Ben's group, etc.
11:57:38 [McCool]
kaz: also, need to have another resolution for "groups" that are involved in WoT
11:58:41 [McCool]
ege: Publishing@W3C page mentions activities
11:58:54 [McCool]
kaz: obsolete terminology, unfortunately
12:03:41 [McCool]
mm: suggest we make a list of things to do in the issue, and Kaz should comment on additional tasks
12:07:08 [McCool]
kaz: I am a little worried about visibility of this discussion
12:07:24 [McCool]
mm: we could use a private repo
12:09:07 [McCool]
ege: ok, let me do that
12:10:23 [McCool]
mm: let's aim to get a draft done by the pre-TPAC, then get input, then aim to finalize that it that week
12:10:43 [McCool]
... maybe can allocate two slots; first to discuss draft and gather input, second for actual resolution
12:17:29 [kaz]
[adjourned]
12:17:32 [kaz]
rrsagent, draft minutes
12:17:32 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/08/16-wot-marketing-minutes.html kaz
13:35:34 [Zakim]
Zakim has left #wot-marketing