IRC log of coga on 2022-07-21

Timestamps are in UTC.

13:04:47 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #coga
13:04:47 [RRSAgent]
logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/07/21-coga-irc
13:04:49 [trackbot]
RRSAgent, make logs public
13:04:52 [trackbot]
Meeting: Cognitive and Learning Disabilities Accessibility Task Force Teleconference
13:04:52 [trackbot]
Date: 21 July 2022
13:05:45 [Lisa]
agenda https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UAFHZuxmyhYAjZZyWxp_rvhIHuXmeWQosgVZD5LcxmM/edit#heading=h.pnntvdf9fs4e
13:05:59 [Lisa]
agenda: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UAFHZuxmyhYAjZZyWxp_rvhIHuXmeWQosgVZD5LcxmM/edit#heading=h.pnntvdf9fs4e
13:06:08 [Lisa]
agenda+ https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UAFHZuxmyhYAjZZyWxp_rvhIHuXmeWQosgVZD5LcxmM/edit#heading=h.pnntvdf9fs4e
13:06:16 [Lisa]
agenda?
13:06:37 [Lisa]
clear agenda
13:06:47 [Lisa]
Agenda+ Check in with all sub-groups and COGA Action Items Does anyone need pending agenda items?
13:06:58 [Lisa]
clear agenda
13:07:25 [Lisa]
Agenda+ Check in with all sub-groups and COGA Action Items https://docs.google.com/document/d/15HtPkkYx1CIl6bAwP2nsSZKhqTVbqcuMDRz5RmtmvXg/edit
13:07:36 [Lisa]
Agenda+ Draft from the who https://www.research.net/r/WHOReportHealthEquityPWDs Deadline August 5
13:07:47 [Lisa]
Agenda+ Reminder send the survey for UXR
13:07:57 [Lisa]
Agenda+ Review resolutions from ftf. See https://www.w3.org/2022/07/12-coga-minutes.html
13:08:14 [Lisa]
Agenda+ Who will be at tpac
13:08:24 [Lisa]
Agenda+ Finish functional needs review https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ndRziXRfnyAgDaL8ctByQagDdM36H8QxV44lO3u8zgc/edit#
13:18:58 [Lisa]
regrets
13:19:00 [Lisa]
Survey link (public): https://bit.ly/content-usable-v2 Link to survey results: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1s2mqTweqrNmB4gSSfC3I-rx31Gl8OJPAUW1v9_gVsSc/edit#responses
13:30:40 [Lisa]
regrets+ arron, shawn (partial)
13:34:35 [Lisa]
sign up to scribe: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/coga/wiki/Scribe_list
13:56:10 [Jennie]
Jennie has joined #coga
13:59:17 [Lisa]
Scribe: Jennie
13:59:24 [Jennie]
present+
13:59:27 [ShawnT]
ShawnT has joined #coga
13:59:51 [Lisa]
zakim, next item
13:59:51 [Zakim]
agendum 1 -- Check in with all sub-groups and COGA Action Items https://docs.google.com/document/d/15HtPkkYx1CIl6bAwP2nsSZKhqTVbqcuMDRz5RmtmvXg/edit -- taken up [from Lisa]
14:00:25 [Rain]
Rain has joined #coga
14:00:33 [Rain]
present+
14:00:46 [rashmi]
rashmi has joined #coga
14:00:54 [Lisa]
actions : https://docs.google.com/document/d/15HtPkkYx1CIl6bAwP2nsSZKhqTVbqcuMDRz5RmtmvXg/edit#
14:00:55 [Jennie]
Lisa: We are keeping the updates short today
14:01:09 [Jennie]
Shawn: Update on the test group
14:01:15 [Jennie]
...Jennie and I met to organize, and get ready
14:01:25 [Jennie]
...We are organizing the Google Drive folder
14:01:31 [Becca_Monteleone]
Becca_Monteleone has joined #coga
14:01:31 [Jennie]
...Our next step is to review the documents
14:01:38 [rashmi]
present+
14:01:40 [Jennie]
...Our future meetings
14:01:40 [Becca_Monteleone]
present+
14:02:13 [Le]
Le has joined #coga
14:02:19 [Jennie]
Lisa: I saw your requests. The only one doesn't work for the end of August
14:02:20 [Le]
present+
14:02:23 [Jennie]
Shawn: OK, those should work
14:02:43 [EA]
EA has joined #coga
14:02:44 [Jennie]
...We have tried to create some asynchronous work tasks
14:02:53 [Jennie]
...Jennie and I will meet, review to be sure work is getting done
14:03:02 [Jennie]
...Then we will meet with the group, task out the work
14:03:08 [Jennie]
Lisa: Thank you, that sounds good
14:03:22 [Lisa]
actions : https://docs.google.com/document/d/15HtPkkYx1CIl6bAwP2nsSZKhqTVbqcuMDRz5RmtmvXg/edit#
14:03:32 [ShawnT]
present+
14:03:35 [Jennie]
...We are starting with actions, trying to keep it brief
14:04:01 [Jennie]
...One suggestion for subgroups: we are each meeting about once per month
14:04:10 [EA]
present+
14:04:16 [Jennie]
...It would be great to meet sometimes as a follow on meeting mid month when your group can do it
14:04:23 [Jennie]
...Not in the slot on Thursday
14:04:28 [Jennie]
...This will help tasks move faster
14:04:36 [Jennie]
...Mental health group?
14:04:45 [Jennie]
...I don't think there are important updates
14:05:02 [Jennie]
...We are finishing off the analysis - literary review. We want to finish by the beginning of October
14:05:09 [Jennie]
...We need everyone to have their papers done by then.
14:05:22 [Jennie]
...We had a great session at the conference
14:05:33 [Jennie]
...Structural review for Content Usable has a meeting after this
14:05:43 [krisanne]
krisanne has joined #coga
14:05:52 [Lisa]
Survey: https://forms.gle/J4gJ2timJwwxS4Jc7
14:05:58 [Jennie]
Rain: We are still trying to get the outreach on the form to go beyond
14:06:01 [Jennie]
...I created an outreach spreadsheet
14:06:03 [Rain]
Outreach spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1xXjHPCfWm00iAJqmjdwFq_RQ80vKwwxFAoiEGI3NOlM/edit#gid=0
14:06:10 [Jennie]
Lisa: We have an agenda item on that topic
14:06:27 [Jennie]
Rain: We have analytics from Roy we can start looking at
14:06:34 [Jennie]
Lisa: well done on getting out the survey
14:06:37 [Jennie]
...Clear Language
14:07:05 [Jennie]
Julie: I am getting ready to send out a document to the team with a thought starter for test type for each of the patterns in Silver
14:07:10 [Jennie]
...This was Rachael's recommendation
14:07:19 [Jennie]
...For those that have a clear yes or no answer
14:07:28 [Jennie]
...Then for patterns that are harder to test using this method
14:07:38 [Jennie]
...What would be better suited for a procedural test or a protocol
14:07:49 [Jennie]
...What did the organization that created the page - what did they do?
14:07:55 [Jennie]
...What is their policy? Their process?
14:08:01 [Jennie]
...Checking this as opposed to the output
14:08:13 [Jennie]
...I will send out to the team some ideas to begin to think about
14:08:20 [Jennie]
...When is the next Clear Language meeting?
14:08:35 [Jennie]
...I cannot attend the meeting next week
14:09:03 [Jennie]
Lisa: Can the Test Plan meet along with the Clear Language group?
14:09:31 [Jennie]
Julie: This may be a good thing for the test plan group to debate
14:09:38 [Jennie]
...This will help with the Clear Language for Silver
14:09:44 [kirkwood]
+1 to both meeting
14:09:56 [kirkwood]
present+
14:09:57 [Jennie]
Lisa: I am asking if they want to move their meeting to August 4th?
14:09:59 [Jennie]
q?
14:10:18 [julierawe]
julierawe has joined #coga
14:10:21 [julierawe]
present+
14:10:27 [Jennie]
ack Jennie
14:11:39 [Jennie]
Lisa: OK it will be mental health next week, then test plans the week of August 4th
14:11:44 [Jennie]
...Thank you Shawn for your flexibility
14:12:08 [Lisa]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wu0WYcvCpp-zIz2NzPk2AuTJOrzgh3T4sKQgzCa10ps/edit#
14:12:17 [Jennie]
...We have a document online that is a summary for what we think the research plan - outline
14:12:27 [Jennie]
...1st is background
14:12:34 [Jennie]
...Creating a survey, providing the background
14:12:53 [Jennie]
...Finding synergies is what I would like to report back to the larger group
14:13:19 [Jennie]
...Ph.D. students can use this as part of their research
14:13:26 [Jennie]
...Le had good ideas on working with people
14:13:47 [Jennie]
...I need to take to the W3C coordination group how we do it, what's the right way to go about working with people doing their Ph.D's
14:13:56 [Lisa]
Q?
14:14:05 [Jennie]
...If people have other suggestions, that would be fantastic
14:14:19 [Jennie]
...If you have any ideas on groups - we have great suggestions already.
14:14:44 [Jennie]
...Recruiting people like that would be fantastic
14:14:49 [Jennie]
...Have a look at the outline
14:14:57 [Jennie]
...The foundational research will be really important
14:15:08 [Jennie]
...Then the gap analysis will let us know what research is necessary
14:15:19 [Lisa]
Q?
14:15:20 [Jennie]
...The note can be after the second version of Content Usable
14:15:31 [Jennie]
...Images subgroup
14:15:57 [Jennie]
Jennie: no updates
14:16:12 [Jennie]
Lisa: I think we should do subgroup updates every one week, and member updates on the opposite week
14:16:28 [Rain]
+1
14:16:29 [Jennie]
...And if we are meeting every 2 weeks, does that sound ok to the subgroup leaders
14:16:33 [Jennie]
+1
14:16:37 [julierawe]
+1
14:16:47 [Jennie]
Lisa: OK, I am seeing agreement on that
14:16:58 [Jennie]
...Rain is working on the APA issue 264
14:17:03 [Jennie]
...Next week we will have something
14:17:12 [Jennie]
...There is a draft from the WHO that I sent to the list
14:17:21 [Lisa]
https://www.who.int/news-room/events/detail/2022/07/18/default-calendar/call-for-feedback-on-the-draft-who-global-report-on-health-equity-for-persons-with-disabilities
14:17:38 [Jennie]
Lisa: We are not making a response as COGA
14:17:55 [Jennie]
...If you want to make individual responses, we can discuss it next week
14:18:05 [Jennie]
...Does that work?
14:18:24 [Jennie]
...EO
14:18:41 [Jennie]
Julie: I updated the COGA document, noting I had sent the side by side comparison to EO on July 12
14:18:53 [Jennie]
...Kevin was on vacation, so we are waiting for a response
14:19:06 [Jennie]
...I am still drafting our responses to EO's revised personal stories
14:19:19 [Jennie]
...I will send that to the COGA team to review, before sending it to EO
14:19:22 [Jennie]
Lisa: Thank you
14:19:29 [Jennie]
...Do you want to update the action there?
14:19:49 [Jennie]
...I think we will stop the actions there
14:20:07 [Jennie]
...There are actions from the face to face - a lot is approaching people who might be doing literary reviews
14:20:12 [Jennie]
...That we may want to reference, or use
14:20:49 [Jennie]
...Anyone doing literary reviews for the mental health research group - reach out to Rain and myself if you have any questions
14:21:01 [Lisa]
zakim, next item
14:21:01 [Zakim]
agendum 2 -- Draft from the who https://www.research.net/r/WHOReportHealthEquityPWDs Deadline August 5 -- taken up [from Lisa]
14:21:12 [Lisa]
close item 2
14:21:17 [Lisa]
zakim, next item
14:21:17 [Zakim]
agendum 3 -- Reminder send the survey for UXR -- taken up [from Lisa]
14:21:29 [Jennie]
Lisa: This survey needs to be sent out
14:21:41 [Jennie]
Rain: We need people to send this out - you, everyone on this call
14:21:46 [Jennie]
...Also communities that you work with
14:22:00 [Rain]
Survey outreach tracker: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1xXjHPCfWm00iAJqmjdwFq_RQ80vKwwxFAoiEGI3NOlM/edit#gid=0
14:22:01 [Jennie]
...When we have the community group next week I will be asking them to share with their communities as well
14:22:22 [Jennie]
...This spreadsheet (linked above) - when you send out to someone please share when you sent it, to whom you sent it
14:22:28 [Jennie]
...There is a column for resending
14:22:49 [Jennie]
...The deadline for responding to the survey is set to September 15th because a lot of people are away from their computer because of summer
14:22:57 [Jennie]
...We should resend again in early September
14:23:12 [Jennie]
...This will also helps us keep track of the communities we are sending to, and who has access to those communities
14:23:19 [rashmi]
q+
14:23:19 [Jennie]
...This will help for future surveys
14:23:26 [Jennie]
...We also have a blurb at the top in row 1
14:23:33 [Jennie]
...You can copy and edit this to share the survey
14:23:43 [Jennie]
...The direct link to the survey has a bit.ly short link
14:23:44 [Rain]
Direct link to the survey: https://bit.ly/content-usable-v2
14:24:12 [Jennie]
Rain: I was advised by some that saw the bit.ly that some won't click on this link because they won't know where it is going
14:24:17 [kirkwood]
could we put direct link in there a link to the survey in the outreach record ?
14:24:22 [Jennie]
...you can say that this links to a Google form
14:24:44 [kirkwood]
oh ok thanks!
14:24:46 [Jennie]
...John K is asking if we can put a direct link , and yes, I will add it there as well
14:25:09 [Jennie]
...We want to try to end the survey on September 15
14:25:18 [Jennie]
...A number of people have shared on LinkedIn
14:25:32 [Jennie]
...That only goes to the country you are in, or the people that follow you
14:25:45 [Jennie]
...This is why we mostly have people responding from the US and Canada
14:25:57 [Jennie]
...For those on the call not in the US and Canada - please post on your networks as well
14:26:11 [Jennie]
...I would like to see over 200 responses - we have 46 now
14:26:33 [Jennie]
Lisa: This is a great survey. If only Rain sends it out, there is a large number of Google responders
14:26:34 [Jennie]
q+
14:26:52 [Rain]
Huge +1 to Lisa's comment. The results are very biased right now!
14:26:54 [Lisa]
ack next
14:27:00 [Jennie]
Rashmi: When I posted it on LinkedIn I got great feedback
14:27:23 [Jennie]
...They want to provide feedback about the structure about the document. They want to connect personally
14:27:29 [Jennie]
...Who should I connect them with?
14:27:49 [Jennie]
Rain: It would be great if you could make that connection between me and those individuals, and share what they are sharing
14:27:52 [Jennie]
Rashmi: Great
14:28:16 [Jennie]
Rain: As a group - there are some things that we had to do in the form that are not cognitively accessible because of how research is done in terms of disclosure
14:28:22 [Jennie]
...Great feedback has been received
14:28:36 [Jennie]
...If any of the feedback is around this, I can share with the group, and this is good feedback to get
14:28:55 [Jennie]
Lisa: I am taking a note
14:29:09 [Lisa]
ack next
14:29:12 [Jennie]
...When we make feedback, we need a way to provide feedback that doesn't require writing at all
14:29:29 [Lisa]
well done jenny
14:29:42 [julierawe]
Way to go, Jenny!
14:29:54 [Lisa]
fantastic
14:29:54 [Rain]
Thank you, Jennie! Please add to the outreach spreadsheet when you have the chance: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1xXjHPCfWm00iAJqmjdwFq_RQ80vKwwxFAoiEGI3NOlM/edit#gid=0
14:29:56 [julierawe]
I mean Jennie :)
14:29:56 [ShawnT]
+1 to julierawe
14:30:11 [Becca_Monteleone]
For future surveys - I have some experience making both informed consent documents and data collection cogntiively accessible - at least on the academic research side.
14:30:28 [Lisa]
zakim, next item
14:30:28 [Zakim]
agendum 4 -- Review resolutions from ftf. See https://www.w3.org/2022/07/12-coga-minutes.html -- taken up [from Lisa]
14:30:37 [Jennie]
Jennie: I shared the information about the survey in the Office of Accessibility newsletter - link is posted to the list. This went to 2481 subscribers
14:30:52 [Jennie]
Lisa: I want to get to the functional review
14:31:01 [Jennie]
...Let's get these done in 1 or 2 minutes
14:31:09 [Jennie]
...The Face to Face was a great meeting
14:31:22 [Jennie]
...The other thing we had - if people want to click on the minutes
14:31:28 [Jennie]
...We had one resolution
14:31:42 [Jennie]
...In Content Usable - this may be a structural issue
14:31:52 [Jennie]
...People are confusing the name of the pattern with the what to do section
14:32:05 [Jennie]
...The "what to do" was done to help direct people to what to do
14:32:12 [Jennie]
...The names were chosen with lots of considerations
14:32:19 [Jennie]
...Including do they fit in the nav bar at the side
14:32:26 [Jennie]
...With that result, they are inaccurate
14:32:38 [Jennie]
...We need to think about - is that ok? Do we need to rename the patterns?
14:32:58 [Jennie]
...When we are doing things like using them in methods, in Silver
14:33:05 [Jennie]
...Please don't use the name, use the pattern
14:33:09 [Jennie]
...In Clear Language
14:33:27 [Jennie]
...Avoid double negatives - the actual pattern is not to use double negatives to express a positive
14:33:31 [Jennie]
...This helps with internationalization
14:33:38 [Jennie]
...We haven't found a language for which this isn't true
14:34:01 [Jennie]
...The resolution was
14:34:06 [Jennie]
...When writing a pattern method
14:34:22 [Jennie]
...And changing objective names, or the pattern to something else - that has to come back to the group, the bigger group
14:34:38 [Jennie]
...They need a chance to say "hang on, I remember why we didn't do that in the 1st place"
14:34:51 [Jennie]
...And they may say "we didn't do that because"...
14:34:54 [kirkwood]
q+
14:34:56 [Jennie]
...That's a resolution
14:35:03 [Jennie]
...If people aren't happy with that, we can revisit it.
14:35:07 [Jennie]
...It seems sensible to me
14:35:27 [Jennie]
...As a consensus group, we need to bounce these things off of the group
14:35:30 [Jennie]
q?
14:35:36 [Lisa]
zakim, next item
14:35:36 [Zakim]
I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, Lisa
14:35:41 [julierawe]
q+
14:35:45 [Lisa]
ack next
14:36:00 [Jennie]
Lisa: John are you on mute?
14:36:09 [Jennie]
...John we will come back to you
14:36:13 [Lisa]
ack next
14:36:37 [Jennie]
Julie: I totally get the point about needing to be more specific about double negatives to express a positive
14:36:50 [Jennie]
...In the current Content Usable, the name is Avoid...
14:37:01 [Jennie]
Lisa: Yes, the names got edited.
14:37:10 [Jennie]
...They were made to fit in the left hand navigation bar
14:37:13 [Jennie]
...They are not accurate
14:37:21 [Jennie]
...In the What to do section, they are accurate
14:37:25 [Jennie]
...Don't rely on the pattern name
14:37:30 [Jennie]
...Maybe we need to review these
14:37:52 [Jennie]
...In the described by section - the description got ignored by the label
14:37:54 [julierawe]
q+
14:37:59 [Jennie]
John K: That was my issue too
14:38:21 [Jennie]
...and I just don't recall on this where there are, from the double negative perspective, it is standard to use them in one language
14:38:31 [Jennie]
...I find it difficult that we are trying to use this
14:38:39 [Jennie]
...There are other languages as well where this is very standard
14:38:44 [Jennie]
Lisa: We weren't
14:38:51 [Jennie]
...We had in the actual description of the pattern
14:39:00 [Rain]
q+
14:39:23 [Jennie]
...What we had was a description, then it got edited to fit as a label
14:39:51 [Jennie]
...A second point I am taking away from this is that we need to go through the labels that are now the titles of the pattern
14:40:03 [Jennie]
...We have to make sure that they are accurate. They don't have to be detailed
14:40:16 [Jennie]
John K: that makes sense
14:40:27 [Jennie]
Lisa: This was a first draft, we are going to make mistakes like that
14:40:43 [Jennie]
...Let's make sure that you won't do the wrong thing by just reading the label
14:41:00 [Lisa]
ack next
14:41:16 [Jennie]
Julie: I did wonder why the pattern was not named "use a simple structure"
14:41:32 [Jennie]
...This solves 2 problems: to say avoid double negatives, nested clauses - this sounds like different things
14:41:38 [kirkwood]
“simple structure” works great
14:41:42 [Jennie]
...But the title actually does address this
14:41:50 [Jennie]
Lisa: Sometimes these mistakes are crucial!
14:42:05 [Jennie]
...It is only because of confusing the title name and the pattern - you are going to suggest the wrong thing
14:42:11 [Jennie]
...I think we are going to have to add to our list
14:42:15 [Jennie]
...Checking this
14:42:17 [Lisa]
ack next
14:42:29 [Jennie]
Rain: I want to clarify for the group the resolution
14:42:41 [Jennie]
...This example from the Clear Language is why we have the resolution
14:42:57 [Jennie]
...The resolution is that as we are working on things like the materials with the Clear Language we are trying to put into Silver
14:43:16 [Jennie]
...We will have to, at times, change wording, break things up into different components from what maps to Making Content Usable
14:43:40 [Jennie]
...The resolution: when these types of activities occur, before we do more work on a particular element after trying to make one of those changes
14:43:53 [Jennie]
...That we bring those changes back to this group to verify that this group knows that change is accurate
14:44:07 [Jennie]
...I want to be sure we don't focus on the one single example
14:44:13 [Jennie]
...This is more of a process concern
14:44:24 [Jennie]
...This will help with the Silver work, and the update to Content Usable
14:44:31 [julierawe]
+1 to Rain
14:44:42 [Jennie]
...We will be updating language and we may risk these types of issues
14:44:52 [Jennie]
Lisa: Thank you
14:45:14 [Jennie]
...We have to look at these failures as fantastic - we can learn from them, make our next version clearer, and improve our process
14:45:27 [Jennie]
...This will happen more and more if we don't address it
14:45:36 [Lisa]
ack next
14:45:36 [Jennie]
...Hopefully we will find issues with the process early
14:45:45 [Lisa]
zakim, next item
14:45:45 [Zakim]
agendum 5 -- Who will be at tpac -- taken up [from Lisa]
14:45:58 [Jennie]
Lisa: Who will be at TPAC?
14:46:07 [Jennie]
Jennie: I am attending virtually - registration complete
14:46:08 [Lisa]
https://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC/2022
14:46:13 [ShawnT]
ME!!!!!
14:46:24 [ShawnT]
I'll be there! super excited!
14:46:39 [Rain]
0 at the moment, working on figuring out travel with my manager
14:46:44 [krisanne]
I'm still up in the air about going in person.
14:46:48 [Jennie]
Lisa: We may need someone to be the point person
14:46:55 [Jennie]
...to work out logistics
14:47:22 [ShawnT]
Can we keep this information in the action items document?
14:47:31 [Jennie]
...If I don't get there, we may ask Shawn to be the point person
14:47:39 [Lisa]
zakim, next item
14:47:39 [Zakim]
agendum 6 -- Finish functional needs review https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ndRziXRfnyAgDaL8ctByQagDdM36H8QxV44lO3u8zgc/edit# -- taken up [from Lisa]
14:47:42 [Jennie]
...Yes, Shawn, copy it into the action items
14:48:31 [Jennie]
Lisa: I think we are up to Learning, and we got agreements on learning
14:48:45 [Jennie]
...Memory: short term or working memory is in the comments
14:48:53 [Jennie]
...These are normally different things
14:48:58 [ShawnT]
added a section
14:49:06 [ShawnT]
... in the document
14:49:06 [Jennie]
...We felt that they missed out other things
14:49:13 [Jennie]
...Are we correct with these comments?
14:49:19 [Lisa]
any objections?
14:49:33 [Jennie]
Lisa: Executive Function
14:49:45 [Jennie]
...We thought that maybe some of these go into mental health
14:50:05 [Jennie]
...Rain suggested self regulation and I think that is a better term
14:50:05 [Lisa]
q?
14:50:07 [kirkwood]
I would have pacing in there
14:50:07 [Becca_Monteleone]
+1 for regulation
14:50:08 [Jennie]
...Any comments?
14:50:15 [Lisa]
any objections?
14:50:44 [Jennie]
John K: Pacing doesn't seem to be in the executive part
14:50:50 [Jennie]
Lisa: We have it in the new section
14:51:12 [Jennie]
John K: processing speed is one thing, but self pacing, which is executive function
14:51:35 [Jennie]
...purposefully slowing things down, taking breaks, slowing the speed of things down
14:51:46 [Jennie]
...This is an executive function skill
14:51:56 [Jennie]
Lisa: I just added it
14:52:04 [Jennie]
...Is everyone comfortable with that?
14:52:06 [Lisa]
any objections?
14:52:20 [Jennie]
Lisa: I will make a clean version at the side
14:52:30 [Jennie]
...Mental health: we have emotional regulation
14:52:34 [Jennie]
...triggers, mode
14:52:38 [Jennie]
...mental health
14:52:47 [Jennie]
...This needs more work
14:52:53 [Jennie]
...I think we want to delay that
14:53:04 [Jennie]
...Should we delay this?
14:53:17 [Jennie]
John K: I have a difficult time with this one
14:53:26 [Jennie]
...how to approach it in the construct
14:53:43 [Jennie]
Lisa: This one we can maybe pass on to the mental health subgroup
14:53:52 [Jennie]
...Cognitive and sensory we have asked for this to be removed
14:53:57 [Jennie]
q+
14:54:19 [Jennie]
Lisa: Visual memory is usually part of memory. Rain is suggesting that some goes into language
14:54:34 [Lisa]
ack next
14:55:27 [Jennie]
Jennie: where will we post something like central auditory processing disorder
14:55:42 [Jennie]
Lisa: I think this is less about where it is in the brain, and more about the functional needs
14:58:55 [Jennie]
(discussion happened about what is missing by removing the longer list item)
14:59:07 [Jennie]
(Lisa added some examples into the document)
14:59:11 [Jennie]
Jennie +1
14:59:23 [Lisa]
Language (from different sources, such as auditory discriminatory, visual memory etc)
15:00:07 [Lisa]
any objections?
15:00:26 [Jennie]
Lisa: We are going to ask cognitive and sensory intersections to be removed
15:00:32 [Jennie]
...Any objections?
15:00:45 [Jennie]
...Next is new proposed buckets
15:00:56 [Jennie]
...Any objectives?
15:01:12 [Jennie]
John K: What does fluency mean in this case?
15:01:25 [Jennie]
q+
15:02:16 [Jennie]
Jennie: I believe it may have been EA that asked for that to be there
15:02:18 [kirkwood]
present+
15:02:19 [Jennie]
ack Jennie
15:02:37 [Jennie]
Lisa: This ends the COGA main meeting
15:02:42 [Jennie]
...Subgroup meeting happens next
15:02:43 [Rain]
+1 to combining, sounds good!
15:03:11 [Jennie]
rrsagent, make minutes
15:03:11 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/07/21-coga-minutes.html Jennie
15:04:35 [julierawe]
For Le: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ndRziXRfnyAgDaL8ctByQagDdM36H8QxV44lO3u8zgc/edit#heading=h.1sw3jym07njn
15:08:39 [Lisa]
topic: Structure Review For Content Useable and the Research Plan and Strategy
15:08:50 [Lisa]
rrsagent, make minutes
15:08:50 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/07/21-coga-minutes.html Lisa
15:09:06 [Lisa]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wu0WYcvCpp-zIz2NzPk2AuTJOrzgh3T4sKQgzCa10ps/edit#heading=h.bls0z8ekj5k3
15:09:20 [Lisa]
reserch plan
15:10:12 [Lisa]
scribe+ lisa, rain
15:10:50 [Lisa]
agenda+ making a survey?
15:11:12 [Lisa]
agenda+ colecting ideas such redoing pattern names
15:11:47 [Lisa]
agenda+ share roys feed back
15:12:01 [Lisa]
agenda+ timelines and next step
15:13:37 [Lisa]
take up item 9
15:13:42 [Rain]
Google Drive Link for analytics: https://drive.google.com/corp/drive/folders/1weE_PbvHGJUm4pdzaKp2TBvLAF66A-SH
15:14:53 [Lisa]
we can only get 3 month data
15:15:46 [Lisa]
rain: and data needs to be parsed.
15:16:19 [Lisa]
any volenteres
15:16:32 [Rain]
rain: is there someone in this group who has talent with data of this type and pulling useful information out of it
15:18:23 [Lisa]
also the time spent is useful
15:18:44 [Lisa]
where they go to and come from is useful
15:19:56 [Lisa]
people over 5 minuets, over ten muinits
15:20:55 [Lisa]
shawn might be able to do some
15:21:17 [Lisa]
q+
15:21:40 [Lisa]
rain: we need to decide first what we want
15:21:49 [Rain]
ack Lisa
15:21:58 [kirkwood]
q+
15:22:11 [Rain]
Lisa: make a Google Doc to collect our questions that we want to understand
15:22:21 [Rain]
... Put the information we want into a spreadsheet
15:22:54 [Lisa]
write some macros
15:23:29 [Lisa]
john is concerned about removing data. bounces are important
15:23:46 [ShawnT]
+1 to convert them to excel
15:24:37 [Lisa]
q+ Add to questions, how many more the five miunets
15:24:44 [Lisa]
ack next
15:25:48 [Lisa]
john to look at files
15:26:26 [Rain]
Spreadsheet to include the data and review: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1YitWbImy9QSPpmTAzOo_Jcg6jOg9Xe--kj3uHe5rHD0/edit#gid=0
15:27:38 [Lisa]
we want to do this on a few pages
15:28:24 [Lisa]
rain: our goal were pages are coming from, and going next
15:28:36 [Lisa]
john: what is our goals?
15:28:51 [Lisa]
rain: how they are using it
15:29:13 [Lisa]
jouhn: you cant do that without cookies
15:29:36 [Lisa]
rain: we have some within the site
15:29:43 [Lisa]
q+
15:30:25 [Lisa]
ack next
15:30:26 [Zakim]
Add, you wanted to questions, how many more the five miunets
15:31:15 [Lisa]
ack next
15:31:39 [Lisa]
lisa wants to know what issue papers and sections of document are being looked at
15:31:51 [ShawnT]
Is there a tool that can parse this data?
15:31:55 [Lisa]
next item
15:32:04 [Lisa]
close item 6
15:32:26 [Lisa]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wu0WYcvCpp-zIz2NzPk2AuTJOrzgh3T4sKQgzCa10ps/edit#heading=h.y3ela4l7g64d
15:32:35 [Rain]
Lisa: research group has a survey, and we have questions
15:32:36 [Rain]
https://drive.google.com/corp/drive/folders/1weE_PbvHGJUm4pdzaKp2TBvLAF66A-SH
15:33:05 [Rain]
... can we do a duplicate of the survey and edit it?
15:33:08 [Rain]
Rain: yes, we can
15:34:17 [Lisa]
lisa to make reserch survey
15:34:21 [Rain]
Lisa: will take an action to create the research survey
15:34:35 [Rain]
Rain: copied content useable structure survey to use as a starting point: https://docs.google.com/forms/u/5/d/1-VdpaYq0qLk0bZYryimWb-VL_tlklX-D1Uvtd2btzrw/edit?fromCopy=true
15:35:18 [Lisa]
next item
15:35:27 [Lisa]
close item 7
15:35:37 [Lisa]
next item
15:36:06 [Lisa]
the name of the folder is the page url
15:37:06 [Rain]
Lisa: we need to review the pattern names. Where do we collect these?
15:37:11 [Rain]
... should it be part of the structure?
15:37:30 [Rain]
... Also, would like someone to review and contrast the objectives. Are they as good as they can be?
15:37:33 [Rain]
q+
15:38:02 [Lisa]
rain: it is part of stucture
15:38:19 [Rain]
Rain: part of overall information architecture which is why it's part of structure
15:38:27 [Rain]
... and part of our next steps
15:38:33 [Rain]
Lisa: we also have our whole issues thing
15:38:43 [Rain]
... need to figure out which ones belong to structure, research, and a different subgroup
15:39:29 [Rain]
... also where do we collect feedback from the group? Do we have a page to collect it?
15:39:35 [Rain]
... rather than asking us to fill out the form?
15:39:37 [julierawe]
q+
15:40:24 [ShawnT]
Issue Management in Google drive: https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1bNyKOcVYJ__fq66i7sljE_1rxyS6L35Z
15:40:32 [Rain]
ack Rachael
15:40:34 [Rain]
ack Rain
15:40:36 [Rain]
ack julierawe
15:40:58 [Rain]
Julie: has questions that would like a platform to raise informally
15:41:00 [Lisa]
Julie: I would like to open comments informaly
15:41:10 [Rain]
... then if there is reason we can make them more formal
15:41:15 [ShawnT]
q+
15:41:41 [Rain]
ack ShawnT
15:41:50 [Lisa]
ack next
15:42:36 [Rain]
q+
15:42:54 [Lisa]
ack next
15:42:54 [Lisa]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CeqiSy3tVDoeBzCG8LpkyFT1fvugGk86JuT6NvfSiAA/edit
15:43:53 [Lisa]
rain: can we dedicate a call (can be subgroup call. Maybe more then 1
15:44:19 [kirkwood]
+1
15:44:44 [kirkwood]
to Rain’s suggestions to collect and discuss on call
15:45:25 [Rain]
Julie: is there a way in the doc to organize the comments?
15:45:30 [Lisa]
julie: there is a way to organise your comment
15:45:32 [Rain]
... such as starting the comment with the section that you are commenting on
15:45:43 [Rain]
... also to help us make sense of a wide variety of comments
15:45:49 [Lisa]
maybe we can add tages to help catgrise it
15:45:51 [Rain]
... by giving examples of how to give the markers
15:45:58 [Lisa]
+1
15:46:06 [Rain]
+1
15:46:18 [Rain]
Lisa: think we all agree we want to have a Google Doc
15:46:23 [Rain]
... for informal collection
15:46:27 [Rain]
... with markers, tags
15:46:35 [Rain]
... and then have a conversation on a call or two
15:46:40 [Rain]
... at least two calls
15:46:46 [Rain]
... a thursday call that goes into the subgroup time
15:46:48 [Rain]
+1
15:46:54 [Lisa]
+1
15:46:55 [Rain]
... that gives us two hours to discuss
15:47:00 [kirkwood]
+1
15:47:01 [ShawnT]
+1
15:47:03 [julierawe]
q+
15:47:10 [Rain]
ack julierawe
15:47:10 [Lisa]
ack next
15:47:16 [kirkwood]
suggest having it as a standardized name on agenda
15:47:32 [Rain]
Julie: love that we will budget time for this, but nervous about eating into subgroup time too much
15:48:24 [julierawe]
q+
15:48:36 [Rain]
ack julierawe
15:48:38 [Lisa]
ack next
15:48:45 [Rain]
Julie: a lot of the conversation might be about little things
15:48:48 [Lisa]
julie: a lot of them wwill be litle
15:49:11 [Lisa]
some are big picture and some are litle
15:49:12 [Rain]
... is there a forum for having a big picture discussion about the overall structure and giant sections
15:49:41 [Lisa]
rain: we also get big picture as well
15:50:02 [Lisa]
big picture first
15:50:03 [Rain]
Lisa: want to make sure we start with the big picture
15:50:11 [Lisa]
but they will go back and forth
15:51:13 [Lisa]
rain: there will be suggestion, on stucture and that can spring bourd it
15:51:44 [Lisa]
were can we give positve feedback?
15:51:55 [Lisa]
it is perfect for some people
15:52:05 [Lisa]
Lisa: diffrent enry points?
15:52:36 [Lisa]
rain : we need to anlaize who likes what
15:52:53 [Lisa]
next item
15:53:11 [Rain]
Lisa took on an item to do the survey
15:53:48 [Lisa]
rain: next step is to parse the feedback
15:54:12 [Lisa]
lisa: next steps add to https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CeqiSy3tVDoeBzCG8LpkyFT1fvugGk86JuT6NvfSiAA/edit
15:54:23 [Rain]
rain's next step: parse feedback and create high fidelity concepts for architecture shifts
15:54:27 [Lisa]
Lisa: scedule the calls
15:55:16 [julierawe]
q+
15:55:18 [Lisa]
John to look at data from roy
15:55:19 [Rain]
John K taking a look at the data from Roy and seeing what we can learn from that
15:55:22 [Rain]
ack julierawe
15:55:45 [Rain]
Julie to take a look at the Google Doc for gathering feedback on Making Content Usable
15:56:06 [Rain]
Julie: currently called "suggested new content" -- should it be adjusted to also enable people to share changes, thoughts, etc.?
15:56:53 [Rain]
Lisa: also adding "questions we have about the document"
15:56:59 [Rain]
... which may lead to suggestions
15:59:02 [Rain]
Lisa: continue to add the types of things to the document, including what tags, etc.
15:59:28 [Rain]
Lisa: Julie, can you edit the document, and then I'll send to the group?
15:59:38 [Lisa]
lisa: add to agenda?
15:59:40 [Rain]
Julie: yes, taking action to play with the document, then Lisa will add to the agenda
16:01:55 [Lisa]
rrsagent, make minutes
16:01:55 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/07/21-coga-minutes.html Lisa
16:03:44 [julierawe]
I have to drop off, thanks!
18:14:41 [bkardell_]
bkardell_ has joined #coga