IRC log of wcag-act on 2022-07-14
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 12:57:13 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #wcag-act
- 12:57:13 [RRSAgent]
- logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/07/14-wcag-act-irc
- 12:57:16 [Zakim]
- RRSAgent, make logs Public
- 12:57:17 [Zakim]
- Meeting: Accessibility Conformance Testing Teleconference
- 12:57:36 [Wilco]
- agenda+ ACT rules sheet
- 12:57:40 [Wilco]
- agenda+ Open ACT pull requests
- 12:57:42 [Wilco]
- agenda+ Priority issues
- 12:57:44 [Wilco]
- agenda+ "Optional" accessibility requirements
- 12:57:45 [Wilco]
- agenda+ HTML page title is descriptive (c4a8a4)
- 12:57:47 [Wilco]
- agenda+ Menuitem has non-empty accessible name (m6b1q3)
- 12:57:49 [Wilco]
- agenda+ Image accessible name is descriptive (qt1vmo)
- 12:57:50 [Wilco]
- agenda+ Text content that changes automatically can be paused, stopped or hidden (efbfc7)
- 12:57:52 [Wilco]
- agenda+ Element in sequential focus order has visible focus (oj04fd)
- 12:57:54 [Wilco]
- agenda+ Heading is descriptive (b49b2e)
- 12:58:35 [kathy]
- kathy has joined #wcag-act
- 13:01:34 [Helen]
- Helen has joined #wcag-act
- 13:01:40 [Helen]
- present+
- 13:04:20 [JennC]
- JennC has joined #wcag-act
- 13:05:37 [Wilco]
- present+
- 13:05:43 [JennC]
- present+
- 13:05:47 [kathy]
- present+
- 13:06:01 [Will_C]
- Will_C has joined #wcag-act
- 13:06:06 [Will_C]
- present+
- 13:06:55 [Will_C]
- zakim, take up next
- 13:06:55 [Zakim]
- agendum 1 -- ACT rules sheet -- taken up [from Wilco]
- 13:07:15 [kathy]
- scribe: Will_C
- 13:07:25 [Will_C]
- Wilco: meta element 1831 may be ready
- 13:07:35 [ToddL]
- ToddL has joined #wcag-act
- 13:08:01 [Wilco]
- https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/pull/1831
- 13:08:04 [Will_C]
- 1831 - needing one approval
- 13:08:39 [Will_C]
- Wilco - 1831 can be merged when we have approval
- 13:08:57 [Will_C]
- Wilco: I will ping JYM
- 13:09:44 [Will_C]
- Wilco - after merge it can go into CFC (1831)
- 13:10:07 [Will_C]
- Wilco: Helen needs help with Object and iFrame.
- 13:10:19 [ToddL]
- present+
- 13:10:46 [Will_C]
- Helen: trying to determine when ALT is ok.
- 13:11:10 [Will_C]
- Helen: part of the feedback is about definine data type defining accessible name
- 13:12:04 [Will_C]
- Helen: I moved the bit about objects and Alts into 'accessibility supports' section
- 13:12:59 [Will_C]
- Helen: JYM said to remove it, but I moved it and added a note. I have a bit more work to do.
- 13:13:13 [Will_C]
- Helen: Adding examples is a bit out of my wheelhouse
- 13:13:20 [Will_C]
- Wilo: We need volunteers
- 13:13:52 [Will_C]
- wilco: I'll take it.
- 13:14:42 [Will_C]
- Helen: akn7bn - iframe - asked for a new PR with feedback
- 13:15:32 [Will_C]
- Helen: JYM has put two comments on it we need other reviews of
- 13:15:47 [Will_C]
- Jenn: Scrollable elements will be reviewed tomorrow
- 13:16:21 [Will_C]
- zakim, take up next
- 13:16:21 [Zakim]
- agendum 2 -- Open ACT pull requests -- taken up [from Wilco]
- 13:16:50 [Will_C]
- Wilco: mumbling...
- 13:17:09 [Will_C]
- Wilco: 1890 - assigned to wilco, helen and daniel
- 13:17:50 [Will_C]
- Wilco: 1886 - svg, need a third
- 13:18:06 [Will_C]
- Wilco: will respond to question in it
- 13:19:26 [Will_C]
- Wilco: 1884 - JYM already approved. many people will review
- 13:19:46 [Will_C]
- Wilco: 1869 - JYM already approved. many people will review
- 13:20:35 [Will_C]
- Wilco: Todd is getting a PR
- 13:21:15 [Will_C]
- Wilco: 1804 to Todd
- 13:21:40 [Will_C]
- Wilco: Should be all the pull requests.
- 13:21:53 [Will_C]
- zakim take up next
- 13:22:03 [Will_C]
- zakim, take up next
- 13:22:03 [Zakim]
- agendum 3 -- Priority issues -- taken up [from Wilco]
- 13:22:17 [Will_C]
- Wilco: This is a new agenda item
- 13:22:23 [Wilco]
- https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3APriority
- 13:22:26 [Will_C]
- Wilco: may need to recur
- 13:22:56 [Will_C]
- Wilco: Last week, talked about an implimenter skipping cerain test cases
- 13:23:03 [Will_C]
- Wilco: don't want that for the future
- 13:23:34 [Will_C]
- Wilco: Some of these issues have been open for 2 years
- 13:23:57 [Will_C]
- Wilco: in addition to other work. It's important that we don't have known issues
- 13:24:19 [Will_C]
- Will: what's the level of expertise?
- 13:24:28 [Will_C]
- Wilco: most are fairly technical
- 13:25:30 [Will_C]
- Helen: I would like to take one - volunteering for 1810
- 13:25:45 [Will_C]
- Wilco: This one is more of a discussion
- 13:25:51 [Will_C]
- Wilco: lets have it now
- 13:27:41 [Will_C]
- Wilco: issue with treeitems. Aria isn't the rule, it's 1.3.1 and should be a failure. Semantically it's wrong. and leads to unpredictable results
- 13:28:30 [Will_C]
- Wilco: when you have different roles under a menu, the styling will look very weird
- 13:29:17 [Will_C]
- Will: wouldn't this fail 'certain children'?
- 13:29:39 [Will_C]
- Wilco: Yes and no, and you can argue that. But you could change treeitem to button
- 13:30:26 [Will_C]
- Helen: this is an inferred rule. So this is assumed knowledge. B/c it's not within the spec, it's ok. That's what he's saying.
- 13:30:53 [Will_C]
- Wilco: double problem of a bad thing to put in a menu and also missing parent
- 13:31:29 [Will_C]
- Wilco: Do we think this fails 1.3.1?
- 13:34:12 [Will_C]
- WIll: fails
- 13:34:40 [Will_C]
- Kathy: not familiar enough, but in the behavior between menu item and tree item.
- 13:35:00 [Helen]
- My search for the definition got this: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Accessibility/ARIA/Roles/treeitem_role
- 13:36:16 [Will_C]
- Wilco: Think there is a major protential for 1.3.1 issue
- 13:36:49 [Will_C]
- Helen: some properties may not trickle down when there is a missing parent. Lacking tree role may mean that expand/collapse is not inherited
- 13:37:21 [Will_C]
- Kathy: Would putting a tree inside a menu affect the expand/collapse?
- 13:37:35 [Will_C]
- Wilco: Assign this to Kathy for a little bit of testing.
- 13:37:54 [Will_C]
- Helen: picking up my marbles and leaving
- 13:38:35 [Will_C]
- Wilco: #1172 - can someone do a little testing?
- 13:38:48 [Rachael]
- Rachael has joined #wcag-act
- 13:38:57 [Will_C]
- Wilco: if you have a lang attribute and an xm lang is empty, what scenarios might cause a problem?
- 13:38:58 [Rachael]
- present+
- 13:39:51 [Will_C]
- Wilco: need to make sure that it defaults back to HTML lang if there is xml that is missing a lang
- 13:40:08 [Will_C]
- Wilco: just need some testing. ANyone? Anyone? Bueller.
- 13:40:29 [Will_C]
- WIll: I will heroically take it on
- 13:40:36 [Will_C]
- zakim, take up next
- 13:40:36 [Zakim]
- agendum 4 -- "Optional" accessibility requirements -- taken up [from Wilco]
- 13:40:51 [Will_C]
- WIlco: This is kathy's
- 13:42:15 [Will_C]
- Kathy: We talked about last week how we can allow implementers to map to SCs in certain situations when the rule might not be a primary rule. Like a AAA rule written for a AA criterion
- 13:42:49 [Will_C]
- Kathy: Our rules format requires that we must list the SCs that fail in our rules.
- 13:43:05 [CarlosD]
- CarlosD has joined #wcag-act
- 13:43:26 [Will_C]
- Kathy: Atomic rules might not fail because there are separate conditions that need to be checked and it's only checking one condition in this SC
- 13:43:58 [Will_C]
- Kathy: Here is an example where I've tried to make some edits
- 13:45:12 [Will_C]
- Kathy: Header section, no changes, but under there, I have changed it to 'mapping conformance requirement' which is a mapping of SCs that may apply. adding bits about when the outcomes have passed
- 13:46:11 [Will_C]
- Kathy: Making the listing of an SC in a rule narrower in scope, to satisfy the conditinos when it has passed. THis removes the AAA SCs, and moves them to a new section called 'Requirements (optional)'
- 13:46:28 [Will_C]
- Kathy: 4.4.2 is for supplemental, related, etc...
- 13:47:09 [Will_C]
- Kathy: 4.4.2 allows for further testing when the outcome is failed. But also allows AA SCs to pass, and creating a section for further testing
- 13:49:34 [Will_C]
- Wilco: Has opinions
- 13:50:28 [Will_C]
- Helen: One Q - the more that can be picked up programmatically vs, manual, should the further testing be for manual? Since machines don't get nuance
- 13:51:06 [Will_C]
- Helen: Is this more for the black and white rules?
- 13:51:40 [Will_C]
- Kathy: 'Further testing is needed' is for times when there's going to be another rule that really determines whether the SC should be considered not satisfied
- 13:54:40 [Will_C]
- Wilco: THe reason we put that in there was the thought that rules are tech specific. We can't prove we tested everything.
- 13:55:17 [Will_C]
- Wilco: There are always ways rules can fail. Pretty much never happens that rules can tell you it passed
- 13:56:20 [Will_C]
- Kathy: I see that. I originally had left 'or further testing is needed' in. but it gets more wordy.
- 13:56:40 [Will_C]
- Wilco: Britney joined early.
- 13:57:08 [Will_C]
- Wilco: let's wrap this up? Should we put this into a PR
- 13:57:14 [Will_C]
- Kathy: I can do that
- 13:57:56 [Will_C]
- WIlco: next week, Surveys are due today. Please look at the rule sheet and fill out where your name isnt
- 13:58:23 [Will_C]
- WIlco: I'm out next weekend but you know I'll join anyway
- 13:58:33 [Will_C]
- Helen: I am bad
- 13:58:42 [Will_C]
- Wilco: wrapping.
- 13:59:15 [stevelee]
- stevelee has joined #wcag-act
- 14:02:26 [Wilco]
- zakim, end meeting
- 14:02:26 [Zakim]
- As of this point the attendees have been Wilco, ChrisLoiselle, kathy, ToddL, Helen, Daniel, JennC, Will_C, Rachael
- 14:02:28 [Zakim]
- RRSAgent, please draft minutes v1
- 14:02:28 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/07/14-wcag-act-minutes.html Zakim
- 14:02:31 [Zakim]
- I am happy to have been of service, Wilco; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye
- 14:02:35 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #wcag-act
- 14:02:38 [Wilco]
- RRSAgent, bye
- 14:02:38 [RRSAgent]
- I see no action items