20:06:12 RRSAgent has joined #dxwg 20:06:12 logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/05/24-dxwg-irc 20:06:20 chair: Caroline_ 20:06:21 Present+ 20:06:30 Regrets+ David 20:06:34 present+ 20:06:56 scribe: Caroline_ 20:06:57 Ana_Duarte__ has joined #DXWG 20:07:28 rrsagent, make logs public 20:07:39 Present+ 20:09:16 Proposed: approve last meeting minutes https://www.w3.org/2022/05/10-dxwg-minutes 20:09:23 +1 20:09:34 +1 20:09:44 +1 20:09:49 +1 20:10:02 +0 (was not there) 20:10:12 Resolved: approved last meeting minutes 20:10:15 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 20:10:15 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/05/24-dxwg-minutes.html riccardoAlbertoni 20:10:58 riccardoAlbertoni: a couple of issues about DCAT 20:11:03 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1502 20:11:12 ... internationalization and security and privacy 20:11:33 ... we can submit the checklists to the groups 20:11:50 ... some of them expect that we provide a date taht we will reply 20:12:19 ... I think we don't have a transition date for the candidate recommendation 20:13:06 ... last dxwg call we suggested early August to receive feddback and consider end of August for a deadline 20:13:44 ... so we must indicate a deadline 20:14:28 ... we can move to candidate recommendation in October or November 20:16:24 Caroline_: what about early September? 20:18:03 pchampin: W3C admin staff will also be on vacation on July 20:18:16 s/will also/may also/ 20:18:35 riccardoAlbertoni: So it is probably a good plan to consider September 20:18:51 s/taht/that 20:20:48 riccardoAlbertoni: the CR is the stage where we start the implementation report 20:21:07 ... in the new charter we have 2 years 20:21:17 Caroline_: we have until the end of 2023 20:22:38 riccardoAlbertoni: proposal: September as a deadline for DXWG review 20:22:52 s/riccardoAlbertoni:/ 20:23:23 proposal: September as a deadline for DXWG horizontal review 20:23:45 s/proposal: September as a deadline for DXWG horizontal review/ 20:24:25 proposed: September as a deadline for DXWG horizontal reviews 20:24:35 +1 20:24:36 +1 20:24:37 +1 20:24:37 +1 20:24:42 +1 20:24:59 Resolved: September as a deadline for DXWG horizontal review 20:25:13 s/review/reviews 20:25:55 Technical Architecture Group ( TAG) 20:26:01 riccardoAlbertoni: we addressed 3 horizontal reviews until now. Andrea addressed TAG 20:27:04 ... There is no checklist and DCAT it is not critical for TAG. Should we contact them now or wait for CR? 20:27:26 https://www.w3.org/Guide/documentreview/ 20:28:57 riccardoAlbertoni: regardind TAG we only need to make sure we are on the right track 20:29:07 s/regardind/regarding 20:30:27 https://tag.w3.org/workmode/ 20:30:40 https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues 20:30:50 Pierre-Antoine: This webpage mentions a repository review 20:31:42 ... there is no specifics and it makes sense since TAG is a higher level review 20:31:59 ... there is nothing critical about DCAT regarding the principles 20:32:29 ... taking inspiratio from the existing issues in this repository might help 20:32:42 s/inspiratio/inspiration 20:33:05 https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/712 20:33:32 riccardoAlbertoni: I think we can use this as a model for DCAT https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/712 20:34:41 Pierre-Antoine: when you create a issue there are three templates. One of them is for the spec review, which is for us 20:34:58 The checklist for TAG is available here https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/new/choose 20:35:38 https://tag.w3.org/explainers/ 20:36:05 Pierre-Antoine: there are some examples on the link above 20:36:47 riccardoAlbertoni: I will send it to Andrea 20:37:14 riccardoAlbertoni: the last issue 20:37:54 ... about the transition to different languages. Currently as editors we can translate to Spanish, Italian and English 20:38:35 ... the question we have is that as the translation is not normative, can we translate it after the CR? 20:38:52 Pierre-Antoine: Are we talking about the translation of the document? 20:39:02 riccardoAlbertoni: About the RDF translation 20:39:11 Pierre-Antoine: Is it normative? 20:39:18 riccardoAlbertoni: No it is not 20:39:48 Pierre-Antoine: I will double check, but I think as long it is not normative it can be done later 20:40:20 riccardoAlbertoni: If there is not more comments on the draft we sent, we will send them on the next few days to the horizontal groups 20:42:52 Agenda: Next Charter 20:43:17 Pierre-Antoine: the AC review is open until this Thursday 20:43:30 ... we have 13 supporters 20:43:43 ... might be good to reach some ACs and ask them to vote 20:45:21 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/dxwg-charter-2022/ 20:46:35 q+ 20:47:51 ack Nobu_OGURA 20:48:11 Caroline_: I can send an email to the DXWG group asking to answer 20:48:31 Nobu_OGURA: my organization already answered 20:48:57 Results link https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/dxwg-charter-2022/results 20:49:50 meeting adjourned 20:49:52 RRSAgent, make logs public 20:50:01 RRSAgent, make logs public 20:50:12 RRSAgent, draft minutes 20:50:12 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/05/24-dxwg-minutes.html riccardoAlbertoni 20:50:31 rrsagent, create minutes v2 20:50:31 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/05/24-dxwg-minutes.html Caroline_ 21:19:07 present+ 21:19:54 rrsagent,create minutes v3 21:19:54 I'm logging. I don't understand 'create minutes v3', Nobu_OGURA. Try /msg RRSAgent help 21:21:46 rrsagent,create minutes 21:21:46 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/05/24-dxwg-minutes.html Nobu_OGURA 21:27:24 Present+ 21:27:49 rrsagent,create minutes 21:27:49 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/05/24-dxwg-minutes.html Nobu_OGURA