16:53:46 RRSAgent has joined #aria 16:53:46 logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/05/12-aria-irc 16:53:48 RRSAgent, make logs Public 16:53:50 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), jamesn 16:53:54 meeting: ARIA WG 16:54:05 agendabot, fetch agenda 16:54:05 jamesn, sorry, I don't understand "fetch agenda". Try "agendabot, help". 16:54:11 agendabot, find agenda 16:54:11 jamesn, OK. This may take a minute... 16:54:11 agenda: https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/2b92a902-1365-4ea0-8c68-9f8ae2106fe3/20220512T130000 16:54:11 clear agenda 16:54:11 agenda+ -> New Issue Triage https://bit.ly/3ymUboe 16:54:12 agenda+ -> New PR Triage https://bit.ly/3sqR9LQ 16:54:14 agenda+ -> Deep Dive planning https://bit.ly/aria-meaty-topic-candidates 16:54:17 agenda+ -> TPAC 2022 Survey https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/83726/ARIATPAC2022attendance/ 16:54:20 agenda+ -> Further updates to caption role definition https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/1734 16:54:23 agenda+ -> indicate what to do with multiple headings in hgroup https://github.com/w3c/html-aam/pull/398 16:54:26 agenda+ -> Does aria-hidden obey DOM or AX tree ancestors? https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/1714 16:54:29 agenda+ -> Do we need a notifications API in ARIA https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/832 16:54:32 agenda+ -> 1.3 triage https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+milestone%3A%22ARIA+1.3%22+no%3Aproject+sort%3Acreated-asc 17:01:42 present+ 17:01:52 scotto has joined #aria 17:02:47 CurtBellew has joined #aria 17:03:59 melsumner has joined #aria 17:04:08 present+ 17:04:15 chair: spectranaut 17:04:17 present+ 17:05:02 present+ 17:05:14 MichaelC has joined #aria 17:06:21 regrets: SarahHigley 17:06:36 regrets+ AaronLeventhal 17:06:51 zakim, next item 17:06:51 agendum 1 -- -> New Issue Triage https://bit.ly/3ymUboe -- taken up [from agendabot] 17:06:53 regrets+ HarrisSchneiderman 17:07:07 regrets+ BryanGaraventa 17:07:17 regrets+ MarkMcCarthy 17:07:28 issue 1: https://github.com/w3c/html-aam/issues/404 for future discussion 17:10:02 issue 2: https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/1739 17:12:46 agenda+ for next meeting and aria 1.4 for now 17:13:09 issue 3: https://github.com/w3c/html-aam/issues/403 17:13:25 siri has joined #aria 17:14:10 zakim, next item 17:14:10 agendum 2 -- -> New PR Triage https://bit.ly/3sqR9LQ -- taken up [from agendabot] 17:15:17 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/1740 - cleaning up associationlist proposal. PR in progress. Some review has happened so far 17:15:48 jamesn: trying to clean up based on previous feedback and including listitemvalue,key and regular list items needs more thought 17:16:39 valerie: https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/1738 is next 17:16:49 "

The specification does not currently define IDL attributes for ARIA content attributes of types ID reference or ID reference list. Naming of these IDL attributes is being discussed and may not follow the rules above.

" 17:17:36 next: https://github.com/w3c/core-aam/pull/117 17:18:02 this was assigned for further review. 17:18:05 cyns has joined #aria 17:18:16 zakim, next item 17:18:16 agendum 3 -- -> Deep Dive planning https://bit.ly/aria-meaty-topic-candidates -- taken up [from agendabot] 17:18:26 any deep dives? 17:18:36 jamesn: no meeting next week, so no deep dive 17:19:07 valerie: suggestions? if not now, email us! 17:19:19 zakim, next item 17:19:19 agendum 4 -- -> TPAC 2022 Survey https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/83726/ARIATPAC2022attendance/ -- taken up [from agendabot] 17:19:46 valerie: please fill out the survey in the email i sent regarding if you will come to tpac in person 17:20:12 valerie: you can still participate if you can't travel. 2 questions only in the survey! 17:20:27 jamesn: 9 responses so far 17:20:32 "fine" 17:20:42 zakim, next item 17:20:42 agendum 5 -- -> Further updates to caption role definition https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/1734 -- taken up [from agendabot] 17:21:24 scribe: jamesn 17:22:13 scotto: per the issue (#1703) I raised the question if the placement of the caption element is meaningful 17:23:06 scotto: we were firstly trying to make parity with HTML caption and their nesting. but now we are not doing anything with name by encapsulation and someone could use this anywhere and reference with aria-labelledby or describedby 17:23:22 scotto: does it matter where it is placed? 17:23:35 MarkMcCarthy has joined #aria 17:23:36 present+ 17:23:38 scotto: do we relax that restriction 17:24:02 melsumner: as a tooling author i like restrictions 17:24:20 matt: not sure I understand the rule 17:24:36 scotto: if you want to provide a caption for the table then it must be the first descendant 17:24:40 q+ 17:24:57 scotto: captions have to be in a very particular position 17:25:13 matt: what are the rules on what elements can have role caption? 17:25:34 matt: if someone puts THEAD and TH and puts role caption on a TH 17:25:45 scotto: right now there are no rules written 17:26:06 matt: in an in-between spot where the new roles are being ported over to aria in HTML 17:26:22 scotto: the current table roles indicate that very specific roles are allowed 17:26:30 matt: there are things forbidding 17:26:45 q? 17:27:34 scotto: this is only really relevant when doing a custom ARIA table right now 17:28:02 jamesn: would it be useful to include the caption outside the table? 17:28:51 MarkMcCarthy_ has joined #aria 17:29:11 matt_king: I thought if aria-desccribed by was on table it got mapped to caption? 17:29:19 jamesn: yes, but it isn't annouced as a caption 17:29:29 matt_king: they aren't called captions INSIDE a table either 17:30:00 matt_king: this is kind of where we ended up with tooltip - basically, is there a need to identify it and explictly call it out? it'll add lots of verbosity 17:30:42 matt_king: you'll hear lots of things like "caption describing [the table on the page]" 17:30:49 jamesn: wouldn't that be good? So you know it's coming? 17:30:54 matt_king: hard to say, sounds noisy 17:32:13 scotto: does allow for caption in a table that has an automatic mapping to name a table - similar to legend and fieldset. Allows a caption to be a child of a group - which is important for the new selectmenu stuff going on 17:33:48 matt: we shouldn't be trying to use aria to fix styling problems. 17:34:04 matt: people sometimes use aria to style things the way they want. 17:34:23 jamesn: struggling to understand the benefit of NOT allowing it elsewhere 17:34:32 jamesn: what pollution are you worried about? 17:34:57 matt: worried about it not being useful, and losing some of it's proximity benefits 17:35:11 matt: e.g. if it's left in the table, the relationship is implicit 17:35:49 spectranaut: i'm thinking kind of the same a matt, at this point 17:36:12 scotto: maybe it should stay as it is, for all of these reasons. it's a SHOULD right now, so maybe it allows for the odd one-off use cases 17:37:50 matt: there is no rendered description for table 17:37:58 scotto: obsolete summary - or title 17:38:19 matt: very common for an aria-labelledby to point to something outside the table 17:38:36 matt: wondering why we have role caption 17:40:17 scotto: figcaption will be a aria-details relationship 17:40:29 scotto: will not perform the same naming function 17:40:41 matt: only figcaption with figure 17:40:56 matt: where else can you use caption 17:41:11 scotto: proposal is that caption can name an optiongroup in the selectmenu 17:41:30 matt: aria-labelledby would be an equivalent there 17:42:31 scotto: there is utility here - as the only way to mark that up is putting a group in a div and hiding it 17:42:44 melsumner: do you need captions for that? 17:45:42 cyns: also has a platform API mapping 17:45:54 cyns: AT could choose to use that 17:48:10 jamesn: in practices use role=presentation 17:48:28 jamesn: probably gets read in virtual cursor 17:48:33 queue+ 17:48:40 q- 17:49:10 ack melsumner 17:49:56 melsumner: one of the comments jamesn made - do we have a list of things that we have worked on but are not priorities for browser developers 17:50:08 melsumner: where would I find these things 17:50:33 jamesn: things like spec language etc. that we don't have agreement on from browser implementers? 17:50:34 melsumner: yes 17:51:00 jamesn: we hvae things on the wiki that have been postponed to 1.4, that's basically the only place. or the editors draft 17:51:28 jamesn: issue is that there's only a handful of people that implement these things - more people won't necessarily help 17:51:58 jamesn: everyone is just.. busy 17:57:34 agenda? 17:58:19 rrsagent, make minutes 17:58:19 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/05/12-aria-minutes.html jamesn 18:07:53 bkardell_ has joined #aria 19:42:16 MichaelC_ has joined #aria 19:52:26 Jem has joined #aria