11:54:39 RRSAgent has joined #MiniApp 11:54:39 logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/04/28-MiniApp-irc 11:55:10 Meeting: MiniApps WG Teleconference 11:55:15 rrsagent, make log public 11:55:20 present+ 11:57:27 scribe: xfq 11:57:42 present+ QingAn 11:57:51 QingAn has joined #miniapp 11:58:06 rrsagent, make minutes 11:58:06 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/04/28-MiniApp-minutes.html xfq 11:58:43 present+ 12:00:04 present+ Xiaoping Zhao 12:00:08 xueyuan has joined #miniapp 12:00:12 present+ martin 12:00:38 martin has joined #miniapp 12:02:29 regrets+ Dan Zhou 12:04:30 topic: lifecycle 12:04:53 @@link to tag issue@@ 12:05:06 qing: the MiniApp origin is not the same as the web origin 12:05:27 present+ xiaoqian 12:05:56 ... more like a busniss policy 12:05:57 xiaoqian has joined #miniapp 12:06:33 ... try to figure out how to handle the MiniApp origin 12:07:20 ... no big update to the spec 12:07:59 topic: manifest 12:08:08 martin: reviewing the csp issue 12:08:20 ... somehow related to the origin topic you mentioned just now 12:08:43 s/somehow/somewhat/ 12:09:16 q+ 12:09:38 https://github.com/w3c/miniapp-manifest/pull/46 12:09:48 martin: editorial update 12:10:12 ... approved by xfq 12:10:28 ... if there's no objection we can merge it 12:11:12 https://github.com/w3c/miniapp-manifest/pull/47 12:11:40 martin: I updated the explainer 12:11:44 ... not only 2 members 12:12:07 ... included the members we introduced a while ago 12:13:04 ... we can have another round of review and we can merge this 12:13:21 ... related to #30 and #48 12:14:40 ... about the csp issue, so far i haven't received any comments 12:15:00 https://github.com/w3c/miniapp-manifest/issues/43 12:15:11 martin: I think we can align with WAM 12:15:23 ... feel free to comment 12:15:44 qing: is this related to the origin? 12:16:10 martin: not really 12:17:08 qing: the manifest id uses url 12:17:28 ... we need to consult the MiniApp vendors whether it's possible 12:17:44 ... do you think it's feasible, martin? 12:18:18 martin: I think we can use it 12:18:55 QingAn: we need to see whether it affects the impls 12:19:50 martin: I agree with you that we should continue the discussion 12:19:53 ack xiaoqian 12:20:12 xiaoqian: there's a Chinese company called Dingdao, working on PWAs 12:20:19 https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/1036 12:20:49 xiaoqian: they filed an issue ^ 12:20:54 ... is it something we want to do for MiniApp manifest? 12:21:18 ... should we invite the engineers from Dingdao to talk about their vision for PWA? 12:21:33 ... to see whether we have any ideas about hybrid apps 12:22:00 ... I think we already have a version member in the MiniApp manifest 12:22:10 ... we need to look at if the requirements are the same 12:22:23 ... if the requirements are the same we should support his idea 12:22:59 martin: I will comment 12:23:07 martin++ 12:23:19 xiaoqian: thank you, martin 12:24:03 topic: packaging 12:24:04 https://github.com/w3c/miniapp-packaging/pull/53 12:24:49 martin: cleaned up the RFC 2119 terms 12:25:30 ... nothing affecting the content 12:26:14 QingAn: it's an editorial change? 12:26:17 martin: yes 12:26:27 QingAn: in this case, I'm OK with it 12:27:28 martin: will work on https://github.com/w3c/miniapp-packaging/issues/48 this or next week 12:28:29 xfq: wide review? 12:28:59 martin: I think it's solid unless other MiniApp vendors disagree 12:29:53 xiaoqian: we should also ask the publishing groups 12:29:58 ... because they're interested 12:30:08 martin: yeah 12:30:34 QingAn: about manifest and lifecycle 12:31:19 ... what's the next step? 12:31:23 ... review schedule 12:31:31 +1 to early reviews of the specs 12:31:34 xfq: imho we can start requesting review now 12:31:38 QingAn: agreed 12:32:10 https://www.w3.org/2021/01/miniapps-wg-charter.html#deliverables 12:32:38 xiaoqian: according to the charter we should move to PR in Q3 2022 12:32:57 ... we need to have at least 2 independent impls for each feature 12:33:07 QingAn: we're already behind schedule for CR 12:33:49 xiaoqian: we need to close the normative issues before we move to CR 12:34:54 ... wide review is also required 12:35:11 present+ tomayac 12:35:32 martin: we should also start creating a test suite as soon as possible 12:35:59 xiaoqian: we should also look at the WAM spec to see if we can share some test cases 12:36:22 martin: I'll look into this 12:37:38 xiaoqian: since tomayac is here, i wonder whether he can share how WAM is tested 12:38:27 tomayac: i'm not a testing expert 12:38:39 ... there's wpt, but i'm personally not involved 12:38:57 xiaoqian: thank you 12:40:00 This is the (open) Issue foir creating a test suite: https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/666 12:40:12 s/foir/for 12:40:19 topic: widget 12:40:32 xiaoping: two modificatoins 12:40:37 ... remove the ack sectoin 12:40:43 ... and update the explainer 12:40:53 ... all merged 12:41:26 QingAn: next step for widgets? 12:41:59 xiaoping: we're drafting a widget spec 12:42:55 topic: white paper 12:43:13 qing: i think it's mature enough to publish 12:43:27 https://github.com/w3c/miniapp/pull/181 12:43:51 +1 to publish 12:44:12 +1 12:44:12 QingAn: we can send an email to the group since not all group members are here 12:44:38 xiaoqian: should we add a version number to it? 12:44:45 QingAn: good idea to add a year 12:45:08 ... MiniApp Standardization White Paper 2022? 12:45:38 xiaoqian: looks good to me 12:46:40 QingAn: we may not update it next year 12:46:56 ... if we use the year someone may think it's out of date 12:47:08 ... i prefer use something like v2.0 12:47:22 martin: works for me 12:48:21 QingAn: should we issue a cfc? 12:48:30 xfq: it's a note, we can jus tpublish it 12:48:39 xiaoqian: we can publish it and announce it to the group 12:49:11 topic: next meeting 12:49:28 ... may 26? 12:49:35 +1 May 26 12:49:46 rrsagent, make minutes 12:49:46 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/04/28-MiniApp-minutes.html xfq 13:12:08 xfq has joined #MiniApp 13:51:15 xueyuan has joined #miniapp 14:55:28 Zakim has left #miniapp 16:01:33 bkardell_ has joined #miniapp