11:03:58 RRSAgent has joined #wot-marketing 11:03:58 logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/04/05-wot-marketing-irc 11:04:35 meeting: WoT Marketing 11:04:48 present+ Kaz_Ashimura, Daniel_Peintner, Ege_Korkan 11:05:59 present+ Cristiano_Aguzzi 11:06:03 cris has joined #wot-marketing 11:06:07 present+ Tomoaki_Mizushima 11:06:17 topic: previous minutes 11:06:45 ege: last week we started with minutes review then we looked in two WoT implementations like WoT dart 11:07:01 s/last/scribenick: cris/ 11:07:03 ... after that we reviewed issues 11:07:17 ... one was about where to store articles 11:07:21 i|ast week|-> https://www.w3.org/2022/03/29-wot-marketing-minutes.html Mar-29| 11:07:35 ... I had to contact sys team 11:07:39 ... but I didn't 11:07:44 ... I'll do it 11:07:56 ... finally we discussed about CG collaboration 11:08:05 ... now we have three issues 11:08:20 present+ Michael_McCool 11:08:33 ... we also openly discussed about expectations 11:09:24 ... minor issues with links to issues 11:09:53 mc: I would like to discuss about the issues I think they did not represent what we discussed about 11:10:02 ege: minutes approved 11:10:11 topic: Pull requests 11:10:37 rrsagent, make log public 11:10:41 rrsagent, draft minutes 11:10:41 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/04/05-wot-marketing-minutes.html kaz 11:10:42 subtopic: PR 297 11:10:53 ege: netify configuration 11:10:53 McCool has joined #wot-marketing 11:11:29 ... anything against merging it? 11:11:39 dape: looks good 11:12:07 i|netify|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/pull/297 PR 297 - https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/pull/297 11:12:11 q+ 11:12:16 subtopic: PR 300 11:12:33 s/subtopic: PR 300// 11:12:53 kaz: JP comunnity group is using doc zarus as documentation engine 11:13:00 ... it might be an alternative 11:13:08 ... we should look at it 11:13:17 s/netify/netlify/ 11:13:23 ege: I think is an alternative to jekill 11:13:40 ... thanks I'll look into it 11:13:43 ... quite nice 11:13:50 q? 11:13:50 q? 11:13:54 ack k 11:14:16 i|think is|-> https://docusaurus.io Docusaurus| 11:14:16 subtopic: PR 300 11:14:28 ege: related to issue 297, there are different styles in the list of the tools 11:14:41 s/297/280/ 11:15:07 ... I format the list to have a consistent code style 11:15:12 s|https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/pull/297 PR 297 - https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/pull/297|https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/pull/297 PR 297 - Add Netlify and Daylight Saving information to readme| 11:15:21 rrsagent, make log public 11:15:24 rrsagent, draft minutes 11:15:26 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/04/05-wot-marketing-minutes.html kaz 11:15:29 ... I also moved some tools 11:15:38 chair: Ege 11:16:19 s/scribenick: cris week/last week/ 11:16:21 rrsagent, draft minutes 11:16:21 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/04/05-wot-marketing-minutes.html kaz 11:17:07 ... I updated also some tool description, I'll ask feedback to the implementers 11:17:11 ... is it fine? 11:17:24 dape: didn't have time to look into it, but looks fine 11:17:32 ege: we can wait 11:17:38 ... and merge it during the week 11:18:43 ... adding reviewers 11:20:07 subtopic: PR 301 11:20:47 rrsagent, draft minutes 11:20:47 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/04/05-wot-marketing-minutes.html kaz 11:20:52 ege: I saw in different projects that they have an edit on github button 11:21:05 ... so I added it with this PR 11:21:11 ... it should be in every page 11:21:35 i|related to issue 280|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/pull/300 PR 300 - Unify tool information and reorg categories 11:21:48 mc: is there some way to gather information about people? 11:22:04 ... do we want more than the github handle? 11:22:04 ... email? 11:22:20 ege: I think anonymous is fine 11:22:27 q+ 11:22:27 q+ 11:22:44 mc: we need to be careful to merge random content 11:22:49 ege: I agree 11:23:05 i|I saw in|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/pull/301 PR 301 - Add edit page button on all pages| 11:23:05 ... the feature is meant to easy fixes 11:23:29 mc: It might be better to reprase the button to suggest changes 11:23:40 dape: is not really anonymous 11:23:46 ... you still have github handle 11:24:36 q+ 11:24:39 ack c 11:24:41 ack d 11:25:48 cris: we can use PR templates to ask questions to people right after the create the suggestion 11:26:40 ack dape 11:26:57 ... plus I would suggest to improve the look of the edit button 11:27:17 kaz: I want to understand the purpose of this addition 11:27:34 ... do we really want to give everybody the ability to change pages? 11:27:43 ege: they can already do this 11:27:59 kaz: not really they need to join the WG/IG and follow the procedures 11:28:38 ... people need to understand how to edit the page 11:29:12 ... we should rather think about how to manage resources etc. 11:29:37 ege: I think we can allow everybody to edit the page 11:30:08 kaz: yeah exactly but is this something that we want? will the group by ok with it? 11:31:02 ... it might be problematic to handle PRs from outsiders 11:31:11 mlagally has joined #wot-marketing 11:31:27 q+ 11:31:37 cris: I agree defining a policy would be nice 11:31:40 q? 11:31:48 ack k 11:32:52 ml: question about the policy. Previously we had a resolution that every changes in the marketing pages should follow a resolution in the main call 11:33:07 ege: we edited some content without resolutions 11:33:11 ... like tooling etc. 11:33:36 ml: I'd be cautious to do significant changes without group agreement 11:33:57 ege: I agree, for example the next PR will be subject to a resolution in the Main call 11:35:10 present+ Michael_Lagally 11:35:13 cris_ has joined #wot-marketing 11:35:15 rrsagent, draft minutes 11:35:15 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/04/05-wot-marketing-minutes.html kaz 11:35:17 q? 11:35:20 ack ml 11:35:37 q+ 11:35:44 ege: added a page about articles (maybe even scientific one) 11:35:52 ml: this is an important difference 11:36:12 ... Press release is different from Scientific Article 11:36:25 ... it would be questionable if it should be listed here 11:36:32 ege: we'll have two different tabs 11:36:48 ml: everybody can write an aritcle 11:36:57 s/aritcle/article/ 11:37:01 q? 11:37:28 ege: shouldn't we have this 3rd parties articles? 11:37:47 q+ 11:37:49 ml: it should be very clear that the content is not endorsed by us 11:38:00 s/endorsed/published/ 11:38:13 ege: to me it will be a tab like 3rd party articles 11:38:14 q? 11:38:15 q? 11:38:23 kaz: two comments 11:38:46 ... press release is not done by the WoT WG by W3C as a all 11:38:52 ... what is the purpose of this article page? 11:40:04 ... W3C has mechanisms to list scientific articles 11:40:09 ...we might use it 11:40:28 ege: yes we want to list all possible articles 11:40:43 ... any kind of article that contains WoT related information 11:40:54 ... the goal is to represent the community interest about WoT 11:41:13 s/mechanism to list scientific articles/import all the resources mentioning "WoT", which was already implemented within the old WoT WG page/ 11:41:18 ... about HOW to include it, it would be interesting to re-use the tool you mentioned 11:41:48 mc: ml's comment reminded to me if the website is a product of the WG or CG 11:42:01 rrsagent, draft minutes 11:42:01 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/04/05-wot-marketing-minutes.html kaz 11:42:09 ... it would automatically solve some of the issues that we've just discussed 11:42:30 ml: I agree 11:42:35 ... CG is very free 11:42:47 s/mechanisms to list scientific articles/import all the resources mentioning "WoT", which was already implemented within the old WoT WG page/ 11:42:50 rrsagent, draft minutes 11:42:50 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/04/05-wot-marketing-minutes.html kaz 11:43:16 mc: the default could be CG, but we can have WG pages 11:43:42 ... regarding articles we can use reverse cronological order to keep them updated 11:44:01 s/W3C has import/W3C has a feed mechanism to import/ 11:44:01 topic: CG collaboration 11:44:11 ege: last week we closed an issue 11:44:18 s/we might use it/we might want to re-use it/ 11:44:20 rrsagent, draft minutes 11:44:20 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/04/05-wot-marketing-minutes.html kaz 11:44:42 ... I'm talking about issue #286 11:45:14 ... now we have three different discussions about the point spawned last week 11:46:20 ... mc do you wanted to review the topics? 11:46:55 s/286/288/ 11:47:05 mc: I would expected to see working style in the tile 11:47:12 i|last week|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/288 Issue 288 - Collaboration with WoT CG| 11:47:12 s/tile/title/ 11:47:17 ege: updated 11:47:20 q? 11:47:22 q+ 11:47:27 ack m 11:47:30 ack k 11:47:30 ack m 11:47:32 q+ 11:48:21 kaz: if we (marketing TF) would like to ask the CG to work about the maintenance of the Website 11:48:31 ... we should discuss it right now 11:49:12 ege: ok than you are suggesting to clarify the expectations about the editing of the Webpages 11:49:48 kaz: yes surely the maintenance of the web pages should be included in the expectation discussion 11:50:32 q+ 11:50:32 ege: ml what do you think about CG as Web page maintainer? 11:50:56 ml: I would not advice to have it as the maintainer more like an active outreach of the community 11:51:07 ... like talking, socialize etc. 11:51:12 s/yes surely the maintenance of the web pages/not only maintaining the Web pages/ 11:51:17 ack k 11:51:23 ... maybe forming an implementers group 11:51:42 ege: ok then no expectations about the webpages 11:51:45 ml: right 11:52:29 mc: to be clear maitaining the web page is not between the WG/IG duties too 11:52:44 s/ok than/ok, then/ 11:52:47 ... there's a fuzzy line between outreaching the community and update pages 11:53:07 ... I think some pages should be updated by the CG 11:53:19 q? 11:53:21 ack m 11:53:31 q+ 11:53:40 q? 11:53:48 q+ 11:53:51 ege: I agree 11:54:09 ... wg/ig should work only on technical report 11:54:20 q? 11:55:16 ack k 11:55:30 kaz: I'm not suggesting anything, we should group clearify the expections of ourselves as members of the IG 11:56:00 ... Japanese CG is working on 4 topics 11:56:19 ... in my opionion we should create a list of topics too 11:56:36 ege: I agree 11:57:34 s/I'm not suggesting anything, we should group clearify/I'm not suggesting anything myself, but we should clarify our own expectations as the WoT IG/ 11:57:51 s/Japanese CG/for example, the WoT Japanese CG/ 11:58:15 s/4 topics/4 topics, outreach, deployment, use cases and translation/ 11:58:30 s/topics too/topics like that/ 11:59:11 cris has joined #wot-marketing 11:59:42 cris: I agree with having a list of topics, plus giving the ability to edit the website 11:59:55 ml: why don't create a page dedicated to the CG? 12:00:22 s/don't create/don't we create/ 12:00:26 ege: there is more content related to the CG/IG than WG 12:01:32 q? 12:01:39 ack cris 12:01:56 (we'll continue the discussion) 12:01:59 [adjourned] 12:02:04 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:02:04 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/04/05-wot-marketing-minutes.html kaz 13:07:42 mlagally has joined #wot-marketing 13:07:42 Mizushima has joined #wot-marketing 14:08:39 Zakim has left #wot-marketing 15:17:29 kaz has joined #wot-marketing