20:47:59 RRSAgent has joined #dxwgdcat 20:47:59 logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/04/05-dxwgdcat-irc 20:48:05 RRSAgent, make logs public 20:48:12 RRSAgent, draft minutes 20:48:12 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/04/05-dxwgdcat-minutes.html riccardoAlbertoni 20:48:16 RRSAgent, make logs public 20:48:25 meeting: DXWG DCAT subgroup 20:48:30 zakim, start meeting 20:48:30 RRSAgent, make logs Public 20:48:31 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), riccardoAlbertoni 20:48:41 meeting: DXWG DCAT subgroup 20:48:50 RRSAgent, draft minutes 20:48:50 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/04/05-dxwgdcat-minutes.html riccardoAlbertoni 20:49:06 RRSAgent, make logs public 20:49:25 present+ 21:02:25 DaveBrowning has joined #dxwgdcat 21:03:16 AndreaPerego has joined #dxwgdcat 21:11:46 PROPOSED: approve last meeting minutes https://www.w3.org/2022/03/22-dxwgdcat-minutes 21:11:47 scribe: DaveBrowning 21:11:55 chair: riccardoAlbertoni 21:11:59 chair: riccardoAlbertoni 21:11:59 scribenick: DaveBrowning 21:12:01 present+ 21:12:06 present+ 21:12:20 PROPOSED: approve last meeting minutes https://www.w3.org/2022/03/22-dxwgdcat-minutes 21:12:23 +1 21:12:32 topic: approve last meeting minutes 21:12:33 +1 21:12:34 0 (not there) 21:12:46 RESOLVED: approve last meeting minutes https://www.w3.org/2022/03/22-dxwgdcat-minutes 21:12:58 RRSAgent, draft minutes 21:12:58 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/04/05-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:13:18 topic: Pending PRs 21:13:23 agenda: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2022.04.05 21:13:25 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1487, 21:13:27 RRSAgent, draft minutes 21:13:27 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/04/05-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:14:22 riccardoAlbertoni: Some conflict/inconsistencies have come up in this PR 21:14:39 ...due to multiple PRs active at same time 21:15:00 ... Not clear what the root of the problem is 21:15:20 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1500 21:15:42 ... Further work to day has produced a new branch that seems to address the problem 21:16:32 riccardoAlbertoni: On the substance of the changes, the aim was to harmonize the use of example name spaces 21:18:07 ... Looks like RDF is now consistent. Fixing the html to save the changes in the main branch is a bit harder. Not sure of Alejandra's plan (did try to contact a couple of days ago) 21:19:21 ... We could publish now as is and address inconsistencies after publication 21:19:28 +1 from me. 21:20:11 ... or try to address the clashes now (and delay publication). 21:20:25 Q? 21:20:25 ... or followup with Alejandra 21:20:25 q+ 21:20:29 q+ 21:20:40 ack AndreaPerego 21:21:17 AndreaPerego: This shouldn't block publication - if we can address in time then okay, but it isn't urgent 21:21:25 ack DaveBrowning 21:21:49 RRSAgent, draft minutes 21:21:49 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/04/05-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:22:47 DaveBrowning: Rather publish and address any tidying up afterword 21:25:10 riccardoAlbertoni: we should do a resolution... 21:25:58 proposed: Recommend publication of existing ED as last WD as is 21:26:15 +1 21:26:19 +1 21:26:28 proposed: Recommend publication of existing ED as last WD as is, with some tidying up to be done in parallel to review 21:26:40 +1 21:26:42 + 21:26:43 +1 21:27:39 resolved: Recommend publication of existing ED as last WD as is, with some tidying up to be done later 21:28:26 +1 21:28:30 +1 21:28:34 +1 21:28:42 riccardoAlbertoni: I'll contact Alejandra and also liaise with Peter/Caroline 21:28:56 resolved: Recommend publication of existing ED as last WD as is, with some tidying up to be done later 21:29:01 RRSAgent, draft minutes 21:29:01 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/04/05-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:29:05 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1322 21:31:08 AndreaPerego: this originally raised a year ago, but subsequently became more active very recently 21:32:59 ... Originally we weren't sure if this was a broad requirement but there now seems to be more interest. Not a candidate for the WD, but higher priority after this 21:33:06 q+ 21:33:14 ack riccardoAlbertoni 21:35:03 AndreaPerego: Issue raises again the relationship between DCAT and CSVW or DataCube (e.g.) 21:35:52 ... should DXWG take a position on how we align with other standards (esp W3C ones) 21:36:52 riccardoAlbertoni: Interesting when we have technical constraints in related standards and how much we help out 21:38:35 AndreaPerego: Raises some questions whether DCAT datasets and (e.g.) RDF DataCube datasets are the same. Datacube and CSVW quite close to the actual data 21:39:05 ... Perhaps closer to distributions.... Needs some wider discussion. 21:40:44 riccardoAlbertoni: Not sure we are in the position where we can say e.g. all RDF DataCube are DCAT distributions... 21:42:23 AndreaPerego: May be some more natural alignment with dataseries and slices in DataCube but not straightforward 21:47:52 AndreaPerego: This is difficult to generalise and unclear quite what it would mean in other examples. 21:48:13 ... It does feel that we should make some clearer statement 21:48:27 ... but we need to decide what that is 21:49:30 riccardoAlbertoni: Agreed. It is difficult to separate the metadata from data in a general way.... 21:49:51 q? 21:50:03 RRSAgent, draft minutes 21:50:03 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/04/05-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:50:20 riccardoAlbertoni: Enough for tonight 21:50:21 +2 21:51:08 RRSAgent, draft minutes 21:51:08 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/04/05-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:51:09 +2