16:53:32 RRSAgent has joined #aria 16:53:32 logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/03/31-aria-irc 16:53:34 RRSAgent, make logs Public 16:53:36 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), jamesn 16:53:38 meeting: ARIA WG 16:53:44 chair: JamesNurthen 16:53:48 agendabot, find agenda 16:53:48 jamesn, OK. This may take a minute... 16:53:48 agenda: https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/2b92a902-1365-4ea0-8c68-9f8ae2106fe3/20220331T130000 16:53:48 clear agenda 16:53:48 agenda+ -> New Issue Triage https://bit.ly/3qOJLJf 16:53:49 agenda+ -> New PR Triage https://bit.ly/3JWvYrF 16:53:51 agenda+ -> Deep Dive planning https://bit.ly/aria-meaty-topic-candidates 16:53:54 agenda+ -> ARIA APG migration plan - latest preview https://main--wai-aria-practices2.netlify.app/ 16:54:40 agenda+ [Update paragraph in option to remove DOM focus requirement #1682](https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/1662) 16:54:40 agenda+ [Support aria-description](https://github.com/w3c/accname/pull/69) 16:54:40 agenda+ [Secondary actions on items in composite widget roles](https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/1440) 16:54:59 StefanS has joined #aria 16:55:13 regrets+ PeterKrautzberger 16:55:39 agenda+ Meeting Time 16:55:45 agenda? 16:56:00 agenda is 1,2,3,4,8,5,6,7 16:56:10 zakim, agenda is 1,2,3,4,8,5,6,7 16:56:10 sorry, jamesn, I do not recognize a party named 'agenda' 16:56:20 agenda order is 1,2,3,4,8,5,6,7 16:56:37 s/agenda is 1,2,3,4,8,5,6,7// 16:56:46 rrsagent, make minutes 16:56:46 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/03/31-aria-minutes.html jamesn 17:00:48 MarkMcCarthy has joined #aria 17:01:01 present+ 17:01:02 sarah_higley has joined #aria 17:01:44 big fan of Sarah's tooltip rant 17:02:08 Jaunita_George has joined #aria 17:02:34 scribe: chlane 17:02:45 zakim, next agendum 17:02:45 agendum 1 -- -> New Issue Triage https://bit.ly/3qOJLJf -- taken up [from agendabot] 17:02:46 myasonik has joined #aria 17:03:03 present+ 17:03:11 siri_ has joined #aria 17:03:17 joeyang_ has joined #aria 17:03:19 1717 editorial 17:03:26 present+ valerie_young 17:03:30 present+ 17:03:37 Present+ 17:03:39 Present+ 17:03:42 present+ 17:03:47 1716 17:03:58 scott looking at it 17:04:23 assinging to scott 17:05:07 aam 393 17:05:20 scott looking rewriting that 17:05:37 zakim, next agendum 17:05:37 agendum 2 -- -> New PR Triage https://bit.ly/3JWvYrF -- taken up [from agendabot] 17:05:39 scotto has joined #aria 17:05:46 present+ 17:05:56 zakim. close this item 17:06:04 zakim, close this item 17:06:04 agendum 2 closed 17:06:05 I see 6 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:06:05 3. -> Deep Dive planning https://bit.ly/aria-meaty-topic-candidates [from agendabot] 17:06:08 zakim, next agendum 17:06:08 agendum 3 -- -> Deep Dive planning https://bit.ly/aria-meaty-topic-candidates -- taken up [from agendabot] 17:07:02 dialogs rescheduled to 4/7 17:07:20 week after next, follow up on secondary actions if needed 17:07:37 other thing, have an Open UI catchup 17:07:45 scotto: agrees 17:08:01 jamesn: should we do that on 4/14? 17:08:36 sarah_higley can attend 17:09:22 zakim, next agendum 17:09:22 agendum 4 -- -> ARIA APG migration plan - latest preview https://main--wai-aria-practices2.netlify.app/ -- taken up [from agendabot] 17:09:58 website rather than a note 17:10:04 won't be versioned 17:10:14 things will break 17:10:30 target is GAAD for the site to go live 5/19? 17:10:47 GAAD is 5/19 17:10:53 people can see latest preview 17:11:07 jamesn: some things in flux 17:11:21 not complete, major comments speak up 17:13:03 Jem has joined #aria 17:13:21 ask questions using mailing list 17:14:02 JaEun is available for questions 17:14:23 still reviewing content you can also file an issue in their github 17:14:46 zakim, next agendum 17:14:46 agendum 8 -- Meeting Time -- taken up [from jamesn] 17:15:10 jamesn: one attendee can't make current time due it being 3am for him 17:15:28 agenda? 17:15:29 jamesn: what is the earliest or latest time in the day 17:16:20 jamesn: if we want to have a global meeting ... trying to think about to make it work for all 17:16:44 scotto: will have to choose between this and open UI if pushed an hour later 17:16:53 jamesn: could change the meeting day 17:17:02 3am or 4am not suitable 17:17:07 s/scotto: will have to choose between this and open UI if pushed an hour later/ 17:17:58 jamesn: will put in a poll 17:18:13 jamesn: or different times/weeks 17:18:26 people may miss 17:18:31 zakim, next agendum 17:18:31 agendum 5 -- [Update paragraph in option to remove DOM focus requirement #1682](https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/1662) -- taken up [from jamesn] 17:19:27 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/1682 17:19:29 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/1682 17:19:46 1682 is the correct one 17:19:57 sarah_higley was looking at it 17:20:30 sarah_higley: talked about this 28 days ago 17:20:37 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/1682#issuecomment-1058488408 17:20:46 cyns has joined #aria 17:21:00 sarah_higley: 1682 needs discussion 17:21:20 zakim, next agendum 17:21:20 agendum 6 -- [Support aria-description](https://github.com/w3c/accname/pull/69) -- taken up [from jamesn] 17:22:18 bryan doesn't know current status, aaron had family emergency 17:22:31 zakim, next agendum 17:22:31 agendum 7 -- [Secondary actions on items in composite widget roles](https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/1440) -- taken up [from jamesn] 17:22:42 https://gist.github.com/smhigley/8dbe67f834cc472e3a14bf6b289e6f0c 17:22:45 sarah_higley: wrote a proposal for aria-actions 17:22:58 takes an ID list of secondary actions 17:23:02 for an element 17:23:08 would effect naming algo 17:23:33 children would be normally be skipped 17:23:46 aria-controls should refer back 17:24:28 should be allowed on other roles 17:24:44 jamesC brought that up, and video play/pause/mute 17:24:58 range of roles this would be allowed on? 17:25:00 q+ 17:25:09 range of roles allowed to be secondary actions? 17:25:23 should the allow roles that can be secondary be limited 17:25:24 ? 17:25:33 q 17:26:11 StefanS: adding icons for delete, select, tons of more actions if you press shift f10 for context menu 17:26:23 you can always have more actions than depicted 17:26:44 context menus and keyboard shortcuts should also be considered 17:27:00 list items, options that contains a click handler 17:27:17 aria-actions would be valuable for these kind of things 17:27:24 q 17:27:46 q- 17:28:06 sarah_higley: context menus are a good point 17:28:28 attribute is intended for ID that exist in the DOM only 17:28:47 aria-actions would not be necessary if there is a context menu 17:28:58 this is more for things in the DOM 17:29:06 the ref IDs must exist in the DOM 17:29:24 the actual mechanism to expose it would be to announce "three actions available" 17:29:28 if I 17:30:04 q+ to ask about default keyboard behavior, also wondering if it would be a good idea for a browser to expose these actions as a context menu 17:30:05 this attribute is not scoped to that 17:30:23 stuff built into browser like key shortcuts, I think it would be great 17:31:04 when browsers create