14:01:21 RRSAgent has joined #pwe 14:01:21 logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/03/29-pwe-irc 14:01:23 RRSAgent, make logs Public 14:01:24 Meeting: Positive Work Environment CG 14:02:00 present: Liz, WendyReid, Sheila_Moussavi, Chris_Wilson 14:02:05 present+ 14:02:08 wendyreid has joined #pwe 14:02:29 present+ 14:03:54 sheila has joined #pwe 14:04:01 scribe+ 14:04:21 agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pwe/2022Mar/0005.html 14:04:39 agenda+ Inclusion fund discussion [Liz] 14:04:49 agenda+ Ombuds budget [Sheila] 14:05:00 agenda+ ombuds vs mediator vs investigation vs escalation of criminal activity - how should W3C approach these? [Liz] 14:05:07 LizLutgendorff_: Let's get started then 14:05:08 agenda+ Scheduling in april [Tzviya] 14:05:12 zakim, next item 14:05:12 agendum 1 -- Inclusion fund discussion -- taken up [from Liz] 14:05:14 ... Inclusion fund discussion 14:05:24 ... call out for anyone interested in participating this year 14:05:31 ... we have last year's documentation 14:05:43 ... we should put it in a more permanent place, and revise it 14:05:56 ... I think we're assuming it will be an in-person event this year 14:05:58 i|scribe+|-> https://www.w3.org/2022/03/01-pwe-minutes.html previous 1 March 14:06:07 ... or hybrid, what will that look like 14:06:26 ... three people from this group do a shortlist of the submissions, send to W3C for selection 14:06:35 chair: Liz 14:06:38 sheila: I'll do it! 14:06:41 wendyreid: I'll do it 14:06:56 sheila: Is there something you're looking for in particular? 14:06:59 LizLutgendorff_: Anyone 14:07:03 ... couple of responsibilities 14:07:06 ... revise the documents 14:09:32 ... move them to GitHub 14:09:32 ... write some comms for announcements 14:09:32 ... work with W3M Comms to make a better announcement 14:09:33 ... then shortlisting and recommending people to fund 14:09:33 ... last year almost all the submissions were lacking 14:09:33 ... the legitimate ones were approved 14:09:34 ... I wonder if there is a way to help filter the submissions better 14:09:34 q+ 14:09:34 ... are you both on ET? 14:09:35 sheila: Yes 14:09:35 wendyreid: Yes 14:09:35 Ralph: For getting better proposal requests 14:09:36 ... useful to document 14:09:36 ... you're always going to get "spam" 14:09:43 ... but we can tweak the language 14:09:53 ... one question 14:10:06 ... separate action to create the ask for sponsors for next year 14:10:17 ... to be added to the ask 14:10:37 LizLutgendorff_: That's more W3M, we just reused the previous ones, but we can structure it a bit better problem 14:10:55 ... looking at it from a content design perspective, it's a bit all over the place 14:11:07 q- 14:11:12 zakim, next item 14:11:12 agendum 2 -- Ombuds budget -- taken up [from Sheila] 14:11:22 sheila: We presented this a while back 14:11:31 ... funding needed to build an ombuds program 14:11:38 ... full team training plus ombuds stipend 14:11:43 ... compensating ombuds 14:11:52 ... $26k / year 14:12:10 ... for training, 2 trainings twice annually, 4hrs at $1500/hour 14:12:18 ... annual total of $12k 14:12:21 -> https://www.w3.org/2022/02/15-pwe-minutes.html#t01 15-Feb discussion of Ombuds training 14:12:31 ... stipends, 4 ombuds at 70hrs per year 14:12:35 ... $50/hour 14:12:45 ... reasonable and managable budget 14:12:48 ... $14k 14:12:59 ... the next thing we discussed was putting together a pitch 14:13:08 ... to present to W3M or to find a sponsor 14:13:22 ... I was waiting to take that next step, and I'm read y to do it whenever 14:13:26 LizLutgendorff_: Any thoughts? 14:13:34 ... can we combine it with the ask for investigators 14:13:38 ... case management workers 14:13:41 ... would increase it 14:13:47 ... we've not looked into that yet 14:13:53 sheila: Sounds good to me 14:14:02 ... does that feel like the right breakdown of costs? 14:14:10 ... we're estimating 14:14:16 ... it really is a stipend 14:14:29 LizLutgendorff_: We assume most things will be related to virtual 14:14:38 sheila: We might need to pad it 14:14:39 q+ 14:14:42 ... all costs in USD 14:14:45 q+ 14:14:52 cwilso: This sounds really well put together 14:14:57 ... on travel 14:15:01 ... I might mention that in future 14:15:11 ... we'd want to make sure there is some support at TPAC 14:15:25 ... it's probably naturally accomplishable 14:15:30 ... this feels cheap, I might pad it 14:15:38 ... let's take it to W3M 14:15:52 sheila: Once we take it to W3M we could add a travel budget 14:15:53 s/pad/make sure we're accounting for growth in the future/ 14:16:06 LizLutgendorff_: Possibly have an expenses line 14:16:11 ... for documents and such 14:16:34 sheila: Agreed, I think the thing people will be most resistant to is the ombuds 14:16:42 ... easier pitch for mediators and investigators 14:16:50 ... anything we can do as a budget across roles might help 14:16:56 ... but I understand 14:17:01 ack cw 14:18:29 wendyreid: Travel for ombuds should be considered, since we'd want at least one present at TPAC 14:18:39 Ralph: Agreed with cwilso, look at other orgs 14:18:52 ... what do they do in terms of stipends or compensation 14:19:01 sheila: I can find some corrolaries 14:19:15 LizLutgendorff_: Add those items to the budget, and I'll look at investigators and mediators 14:19:22 s/cwilso/cwilso's thanks for putting this together 14:19:26 ... try and find some US based ones 14:19:41 ... anything else on that? 14:19:51 zakim, next item 14:19:51 I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, Ralph 14:20:00 zakim, next item 14:20:00 agendum 3 -- ombuds vs mediator vs investigation vs escalation of criminal activity - how should W3C approach these? -- taken up [from Liz] 14:20:15 LizLutgendorff_: Next thing, my attempt at refining the roles 14:20:27 ... four levels 14:20:36 ... ombudsperson, entry level 14:20:47 ... a union rep of sorts, give advice, help with CEPC, provide support 14:20:55 ... signpost other areas of information or service 14:21:01 ... they themselves don't resolve issues 14:21:18 Ralph: That's an interesting distinction 14:21:24 ... between ombud and mediator 14:21:32 ... I think they are currently combined in our current process 14:21:35 ... the waypost role 14:21:42 ... is consistent with the stipend discussed 14:21:47 LizLutgendorff_: I think it would be 14:22:07 ... in my experience, as a union rep, the caseload was consistently 20+ people 14:22:17 Ralph: And no mediation 14:22:29 LizLutgendorff_: Yes, I just attended meetings, and supported 14:22:34 ... it would also require more training 14:22:49 ... would the training we're considering include mediation? 14:22:59 Ralph: I wonder if the budget is sufficient if we're considering this 14:23:06 sheila: I thought of it as separate 14:23:20 ... I don't know of any circumstances where an ombud would also serve as mediator 14:23:21 s/this/this as separate from the mediator role 14:23:39 ... I think mediation transcends the ombud role 14:23:59 ... some of these points are qualifications 14:24:08 ... are these expectations? 14:24:15 LizLutgendorff_: Yes this would be part of the roles 14:24:37 cwilso: In the past, systems I've been a part of haven't had this disctinction 14:24:46 ... I think the union rep analogy is helpful 14:24:56 ... I think there's a line you cross when you try to resolve an issue 14:25:00 ... you would need more training 14:25:08 ... I wonder how much of what you put with ombuds 14:25:13 ... would be innate to other roles 14:25:41 ... I'm not sure if we offer too many roles to people if they'll know how to interact with the system 14:25:46 LizLutgendorff_: It's definitely a risk 14:25:52 ... there's a number of options in my department 14:25:56 ... and it confuses people 14:25:59 ... the difference is 14:26:12 ... where you can have an internal volunteer vs needing a paid professional 14:26:22 ... where they are trained to resolve issues 14:26:35 ... in other orgs, we have a top layer to help interpret or understand 14:26:40 ... ombuds serve there 14:26:52 ... in terms of conflict, you don't want to have people who are involved 14:27:07 ... depending on the issue, people will not trust an internal view of the issue 14:27:11 ... they'll assume bad faith 14:27:26 ... perceived history 14:27:34 ... to get around it, you bring in someone external 14:27:54 ... bring someone in who doesn't care about the context or relationships 14:28:11 ... hopefully, 90% of the cases are handled by ombuds, and the remaining 10% go on to mediation 14:28:32 cwilso: I think it makes sense, udnerstanding how frequently certain roles are brought in 14:28:37 present+ 14:28:44 ... in some cases a chair could take a role 14:28:55 ... I sent a mail about this to the list last week 14:29:09 ... the role we're taking on with ombuds is understanding and applying CEPC 14:29:20 ... if it's not the chair, within the group, we'll need someone outside with experience 14:29:26 [-> https://github.com/cwilso/standards-of-behavior Chris's document "Improving Standards of Behavior in Standards Discussions" ] 14:29:32 ... providing impartial advice is a challenge 14:29:58 ... I'm just trying to think through how you easily explain this process to someone who has a problem 14:30:04 ... basically, go get an ombud 14:30:10 ... they can steer you through the process 14:30:23 LizLutgendorff_: These are just definitions for now 14:30:26 ... there's no context 14:30:37 sheila: Complicating factor here, most of the time it's a progression 14:30:52 ... part of the value in an ombud, is giving someone more than one option of someone to turn to when they have an issue 14:31:09 ... it would be ok for someone to leapfrog the ombud if they feel they need someone else 14:31:27 ... we want to include language explaining it's ok, but here is the process 14:31:38 +1 to sheila 14:31:40 ... from the DEI lens, you want people to have options 14:31:44 +1 14:31:47 LizLutgendorff_: Exactly how it works in our org 14:31:53 +1 to Sheila's points 14:32:07 ... you can start with your manager, but if it's your manager that is the issue, you can go to other places 14:32:11 ... it's never one or the other 14:32:14 ... here are the optiosn 14:32:28 ... I think we'd emphasize talking to an ombuds first 14:32:38 ... because investigation and mediation will have a cost 14:32:47 Ralph: Thanks Liz 14:32:55 ... this is a useful distinction between the roles 14:33:03 ... I value your experience 14:33:19 ... ombuds as a union rep, not an unreasonable analogy 14:33:42 ... but it breaks down for me, because our community doesn't have the same employee/employer relationship 14:34:00 ... this does help, we have to distinguish those who are expected to provide advice 14:34:20 ... you approach the people you know who have this knowledge 14:34:33 ... my concern, in Feb, when we first discussed the budget, the number of hours 14:34:47 ... included mediation in the estimate 14:34:55 ... they are combined currently in W3C 14:35:09 ... I'm worried about the estimate 14:35:24 LizLutgendorff_: I think it'll be slightly impossible to project time since we don't have previous data 14:35:30 ... we won't know until this is in place 14:35:41 ... I don't necessarily think it's bad to combine the roles 14:35:49 ... it does limit the pool of candidates 14:36:10 Ralph: Not disagreeing, but the estimates might need to change 14:36:20 LizLutgendorff_: Maybe having a combined budget can help with this breakdown 14:36:23 s/estimates/time estimates 14:36:31 ... Mediator, chairs can serve this role but require training 14:36:43 strong +1 that chairs should have mediator training 14:36:52 q+ 14:36:55 ... Investigator, this is a serious allegation, require a professional 14:37:01 ... empowered to investigate 14:37:09 ... interviewing, gathering evidence 14:37:57 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/03/29-pwe-minutes.html Ralph 14:38:11 ... within the procedure we've written, their report goes to W3M for disciplinary action 14:38:30 ... how this is handled can be done different ways 14:38:40 ... you would likely want an external party to do this 14:38:56 ... final one, if there is a crime, you report to police 14:39:01 ... where do you report it? 14:39:08 s/LizLutgendorff_/Liz/G 14:39:23 ... if its online, and they are from a different country, complicated 14:39:33 sheila: Is there a world where we can explore alternatives 14:39:44 ... to the police? Or assuming a solution 14:39:50 ... international nature makes this complex 14:39:57 ... alternatives to the police 14:40:04 LizLutgendorff_: Just initial impressions 14:40:18 ... most extreme cases 14:40:23 ... but there could be alternatives 14:40:54 sheila: I wonder if there is a world where we can find someone to help guide someone to find the solution for this 14:41:10 tzviya: I had envisioned this, especially for certain crimes 14:41:26 ... it can be unclear where the point going to law enforcement is needed 14:41:45 ... mediators and other roles can be trained to know when reporting needs to occur 14:42:11 ... someone serving as a victims advocate or directing to one 14:42:28 ... international, it can be more difficult and can be traumatic 14:42:47 ... asking someone to help you can help, but should be able to provide advice and guidance 14:42:54 ... and there's some cases when reporting is mandatory 14:43:27 LizLutgendorff_: As part of ombuds training, include something like knowing when law enforcement is required 14:43:49 tzviya: I don't think we can have mediators be exclusively chairs 14:43:58 ... One of the things we could attempt to determine 14:44:10 ... if the role of ombud and mediator should be distinct roles 14:44:19 ... are we intentionally merging them 14:44:24 ... what does the training look like 14:44:34 ... are we offering more training to alternate roles 14:44:34 ack me 14:44:45 LizLutgendorff_: We had some of this discussion, we are leaning towards separate 14:44:53 ... we'd need to make more revisions and adjust the budget 14:45:18 ... other thought, looking at all of these roles as a total package in a budget proposal 14:45:32 Ralph: Liz convinced me that the roles should be separate 14:46:11 ... in our multinational organization, illegal acts can happen in person and virtually 14:46:41 ... in our international meetings, it's really important we provide information to the non-locals on what the appropriate resources are 14:46:57 ack ra 14:47:01 ... their expectations of LE in the place of the meeting may not be the same as their home 14:47:13 ... one of our requirements for hosted meetings, ombuds are present 14:47:23 ... and know what the local resources are and how best to advise on them 14:47:45 LizLutgendorff_: We should also remember, some of the things involved in the place may not have anything to do with W3C 14:47:55 ... it would not be subject to any of our internal processes 14:48:07 ... we'd still want to support them with advice or resources 14:48:43 q+ to ask if we should write a mediator job description 14:48:44 q+ 14:48:47 ... there are a number of nuances 14:48:55 Ralph: And we should be equipped to provide that advice 14:49:10 ... there may be things that are unsafe to do even if they sound right 14:49:15 tzviya, you wanted to ask if we should write a mediator job description 14:49:24 tzviya: I wonder if we should next write a mediator job description 14:49:40 ... and someone to put together a mediator budget 14:49:59 LizLutgendorff_: I can take some of it, if someone could look up mediation services in the US 14:50:54 sheila: I think there's a point at which, if you wish to seek legal recourse, we can connect you to a legal resource 14:51:08 ... I'd be nervous about training people to directly deal with the law 14:51:29 ... as Ralph said, depending on the country, race of the person, other factors, it can be very complex 14:51:37 ... it's not included in the training plan 14:51:57 ... we figure out internally within the W3C how to deal with those instead of leaving for the ombuds 14:52:02 ack sheila 14:52:35 LizLutgendorff_: I think most people as members would be on their own, separate from W3C. I do think we need to be clear about the boundaries 14:52:52 ... we need W3C to fill in the remainder for what they are willing to do 14:53:06 ... I do like at events like TPAC for the ombuds to be aware of what the options are 14:53:19 ... that's an appropriate level of information to provide 14:53:19 q+ to talk about special training for in-person events 14:53:25 ... we need to write it out 14:53:39 sheila: We also need to be clear on what the bounds are 14:53:46 ... what to do if a member is assaulted or something 14:53:51 ... has that been discussed 14:54:09 tzviya: I'm on the queue about doing some kind of special training before events 14:54:16 ... emergency services 14:54:29 ... in terms of what is currently done today 14:54:33 tzviya, you wanted to talk about special training for in-person events 14:54:39 ... current ombuds, there is little formal information 14:55:05 ... we formed a rapid response, but all that is local emergency services and an email 14:55:12 Ralph: In truth, I'm not aware of anything 14:57:30 tzviya: We have a lot of work to do 14:57:43 LizLutgendorff_: Immediate actions to write the descriptions and revise the budget 14:57:54 ... reconvene when we have that and some place specifics figured out 14:58:06 tzviya: Can we discuss the month of april 14:58:51 ... the meeting on 26th overlaps with the AC meeting 14:59:01 ... we'd not be meeting at all this month 14:59:09 ... we could schedule something on the 19th 14:59:51 wendyreid: We have tasks, we could work on our tasks and reconvene 14:59:57 tzviya: Ok, next meeting in May 15:00:04 ... we can all keep in touch! 15:00:50 zakim, end meeting 15:00:50 As of this point the attendees have been Liz, WendyReid, Sheila_Moussavi, Chris_Wilson, Ralph, tzviya 15:00:52 RRSAgent, please draft minutes v2 15:00:52 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/03/29-pwe-minutes.html Zakim 15:00:56 I am happy to have been of service, Ralph; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye 15:01:00 Zakim has left #pwe 15:15:17 tzviya has joined #pwe 15:15:21 wendyreid has joined #pwe 16:21:09 wendyreid has joined #pwe 16:21:12 tzviya has joined #pwe 17:12:57 <`join_subline> `join_subline has joined #pwe 17:57:20 Jem has joined #pwe