IRC log of wot-ed on 2022-02-08
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 11:00:17 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #wot-ed
- 11:00:17 [RRSAgent]
- logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/02/08-wot-ed-irc
- 11:00:29 [kaz]
- meeting: WoT Editors
- 11:01:00 [kaz]
- meeting: WoT Editors
- 11:01:16 [kaz]
- present+ Kaz_Ashimura, Tomoaki_Mizushima
- 11:01:35 [McCool]
- McCool has joined #wot-ed
- 11:01:35 [kaz]
- present+ Michael_McCool
- 11:01:40 [kaz]
- present+ Michael_Lagally
- 11:01:43 [mlagally]
- mlagally has joined #wot-ed
- 11:02:32 [kaz]
- topic: Minutes
- 11:02:44 [kaz]
- -> https://www.w3.org/2022/02/01-wot-ed-minutes.html Feb-1
- 11:05:53 [kaz]
- typo fixed
- 11:06:05 [kaz]
- approved
- 11:06:14 [kaz]
- present+ Ege_Korkan
- 11:06:19 [Ege]
- Ege has joined #wot-ed
- 11:06:48 [kaz]
- topic: Terminology
- 11:07:31 [kaz]
- -> https://w3c.github.io/wot-discovery/#terminology Discovery spec - 3. Terminology
- 11:07:37 [kaz]
- mm: ReSpec issues there
- 11:07:58 [kaz]
- [[
- 11:07:59 [kaz]
- Found definition for "Thing Description", but nothing links to it. This is usually a spec bug!
- 11:07:59 [kaz]
- How to fix: Either remove the definition, or add a "lint-ignore" CSS class. If you meant to export it, add the export CSS.
- 11:07:59 [kaz]
- Occurred 1 times at:
- 11:07:59 [kaz]
- <dfn> element
- 11:08:00 [kaz]
- (plugin: "core/linter-rules/no-unused-dfns")
- 11:08:02 [kaz]
- Found definition for "Property", but nothing links to it. This is usually a spec bug!
- 11:08:04 [kaz]
- How to fix: Either remove the definition, or add a "lint-ignore" CSS class. If you meant to export it, add the export CSS.
- 11:08:07 [kaz]
- Occurred 1 times at:
- 11:08:09 [kaz]
- <dfn> element
- 11:08:11 [kaz]
- (plugin: "core/linter-rules/no-unused-dfns")
- 11:08:13 [kaz]
- Found definition for "Action", but nothing links to it. This is usually a spec bug!
- 11:08:15 [kaz]
- How to fix: Either remove the definition, or add a "lint-ignore" CSS class. If you meant to export it, add the export CSS.
- 11:08:18 [kaz]
- Occurred 1 times at:
- 11:08:20 [kaz]
- <dfn> element
- 11:08:22 [kaz]
- (plugin: "core/linter-rules/no-unused-dfns")
- 11:08:26 [kaz]
- Found definition for "Event", but nothing links to it. This is usually a spec bug!
- 11:08:28 [kaz]
- How to fix: Either remove the definition, or add a "lint-ignore" CSS class. If you meant to export it, add the export CSS.
- 11:08:31 [kaz]
- Occurred 1 times at:
- 11:08:33 [kaz]
- <dfn> element
- 11:08:35 [kaz]
- (plugin: "core/linter-rules/no-unused-dfns")
- 11:08:37 [kaz]
- Found definition for "Discovery", but nothing links to it. This is usually a spec bug!
- 11:08:39 [kaz]
- How to fix: Either remove the definition, or add a "lint-ignore" CSS class. If you meant to export it, add the export CSS.
- 11:08:42 [kaz]
- Occurred 1 times at:
- 11:08:44 [kaz]
- <dfn> element
- 11:08:46 [kaz]
- (plugin: "core/linter-rules/no-unused-dfns")
- 11:08:48 [kaz]
- Found definition for "Exploration", but nothing links to it. This is usually a spec bug!
- 11:08:50 [kaz]
- How to fix: Either remove the definition, or add a "lint-ignore" CSS class. If you meant to export it, add the export CSS.
- 11:08:55 [kaz]
- Occurred 1 times at:
- 11:08:57 [kaz]
- <dfn> element
- 11:08:59 [kaz]
- (plugin: "core/linter-rules/no-unused-dfns")
- 11:09:01 [kaz]
- Found definition for "Introduction", but nothing links to it. This is usually a spec bug!
- 11:09:03 [kaz]
- How to fix: Either remove the definition, or add a "lint-ignore" CSS class. If you meant to export it, add the export CSS.
- 11:09:06 [kaz]
- Occurred 1 times at:
- 11:09:08 [kaz]
- <dfn> element
- 11:09:10 [kaz]
- (plugin: "core/linter-rules/no-unused-dfns")
- 11:09:12 [kaz]
- Found definition for "TDD", but nothing links to it. This is usually a spec bug!
- 11:09:14 [kaz]
- How to fix: Either remove the definition, or add a "lint-ignore" CSS class. If you meant to export it, add the export CSS.
- 11:09:17 [kaz]
- Occurred 1 times at:
- 11:09:19 [kaz]
- <dfn> element
- 11:09:21 [kaz]
- ]]
- 11:09:25 [kaz]
- mm: need to look into the issues
- 11:09:31 [kaz]
- kaz: they're basically just warnings. right?
- 11:09:35 [kaz]
- mm: right
- 11:10:09 [kaz]
- ... the Discovery spec itself is not wrong, I think
- 11:10:46 [kaz]
- kaz: caused by "<dfn>" tags
- 11:10:48 [kaz]
- mm: right
- 11:12:46 [kaz]
- kaz: technically, this issue can occur with not only Discovery but also Profile, Scripting, etc., too
- 11:13:00 [kaz]
- present+ Kunihiko_Toumura
- 11:13:52 [ktoumura]
- ktoumura has joined #wot-ed
- 11:14:39 [kaz]
- ml: we should have some specific notation when the specs have got stable
- 11:16:07 [kaz]
- ... btw, have created an issue on wot-architecture
- 11:16:24 [mlagally]
- mlagally has joined #wot-ed
- 11:16:26 [mlagally]
- https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/pull/704
- 11:16:45 [kaz]
- s/https/-> https/
- 11:17:24 [kaz]
- s/704/704 wot-architecture PR 704 - WIP: restructuring lifecycle/
- 11:17:41 [kaz]
- ml: will add that for the next Security call
- 11:18:39 [kaz]
- kaz: btw, the terminology section of the Profile spec should also have a link back to the Architecture spec's terminology
- 11:18:43 [kaz]
- ml: yes
- 11:18:50 [kaz]
- ... will file an issue for that
- 11:19:11 [mlagally]
- https://github.com/w3c/wot-profile/issues/165
- 11:19:53 [kaz]
- ml: btw, is there a link from TD back to Architecture's terminology section?
- 11:19:57 [kaz]
- kaz: yes, there is
- 11:22:16 [kaz]
- ml: is there also ReSpec warning with TD too?
- 11:22:18 [kaz]
- kaz: no
- 11:22:25 [kaz]
- mm: let's look into the detail
- 11:22:42 [kaz]
- topic: Schedule
- 11:23:29 [kaz]
- mm: there is a gap within specs about what Consumer should do
- 11:23:35 [kaz]
- ... comment from Ben too
- 11:23:56 [mlagally]
- q+
- 11:24:01 [kaz]
- ... need a new PR for Consumer processing
- 11:24:53 [kaz]
- -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/272 wot-discovery issue 272 - Consumer Process for Discovery
- 11:24:57 [kaz]
- ack ml
- 11:26:13 [kaz]
- mm: should look at the Architecture spec as well to see the consistency once the processing is clarified
- 11:27:07 [kaz]
- ... Scripting describes algorithms
- 11:27:26 [kaz]
- ... some behavior description within TD too
- 11:28:44 [kaz]
- ml: one remaining question is Consumer Thing within the Architecture
- 11:31:42 [kaz]
- mm: note that I don't think Consumers have to have TDs
- 11:32:33 [kaz]
- kaz: which TFs should be involved?
- 11:32:56 [kaz]
- ... in addition to Discovery TF?
- 11:33:00 [mlagally]
- q+
- 11:33:35 [kaz]
- ... starting with the Scripting TF?
- 11:33:37 [kaz]
- mm: yes
- 11:34:13 [kaz]
- ... if possible, during the Scripting call next Monday
- 11:35:02 [kaz]
- kaz: should talk with the Architecture TF, shouldn't we?
- 11:35:06 [kaz]
- mm: yeah
- 11:35:18 [kaz]
- ... would look into the Architecture spec
- 11:35:29 [kaz]
- q?
- 11:35:44 [kaz]
- ack m
- 11:35:57 [kaz]
- ml: would like to clarify the confusion
- 11:36:40 [kaz]
- i/would/kaz: Lagally, do you want to have discussion during the Architecture call?/
- 11:37:05 [kaz]
- ... we should clarify what "Consumer" is
- 11:37:07 [McCool]
- q+
- 11:37:50 [kaz]
- kaz: we should have discussion during the Architecture call then?
- 11:37:54 [kaz]
- q?
- 11:37:56 [kaz]
- ack m
- 11:38:45 [kaz]
- mm: should consider for the next round, I think
- 11:45:17 [kaz]
- kaz: based on the discussion so far, the current definition "Consumer is an entity that can process WoT Thing Descriptions" might be a bit vague
- 11:45:27 [kaz]
- mm: we should be careful
- 11:48:45 [kaz]
- kaz: so we should have discussion on this point (Consumer) during the Architecture call as well
- 11:48:51 [kaz]
- ... as part of the terminology discussion
- 11:49:52 [kaz]
- mm: need clear definition for Producer, Registerer, etc., too
- 11:50:54 [kaz]
- kaz: we already have terminology as an agenda topic for Architecture. right?
- 11:50:56 [kaz]
- ml: yes
- 11:51:25 [kaz]
- q?
- 11:52:45 [kaz]
- mm: having a separate term of "Software Thing" might make sense
- 11:53:01 [kaz]
- ... to identify Physical Thing and Virtual Thing
- 11:53:16 [kaz]
- ... maybe "Virtual" is not really correct here
- 11:53:32 [Ege]
- q+
- 11:53:40 [mlagally]
- https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/pull/696
- 11:53:55 [kaz]
- ml: we should have discussion during the Architecture call based on the PR above
- 11:54:01 [kaz]
- ack e
- 11:54:29 [kaz]
- ek: this is good topic to discuss
- 11:54:50 [kaz]
- ... e.g., a room including multiple devices within it
- 11:55:17 [kaz]
- ml: collection of Things or composed Thing, etc.?
- 11:55:33 [kaz]
- s/ml:/mm:/
- 11:55:54 [kaz]
- ... don't think the current definition for "Virtual Thing" itself is vague, though
- 11:56:25 [kaz]
- ... need to identify necessary terms
- 11:56:42 [kaz]
- kaz: ok
- 11:56:53 [kaz]
- ... let's have more discussion during the Architecture call then
- 11:56:56 [kaz]
- [adjourned]
- 11:57:00 [kaz]
- rrsagent, make log public
- 11:57:06 [kaz]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 11:57:06 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/02/08-wot-ed-minutes.html kaz
- 12:23:58 [Ege_]
- Ege_ has joined #wot-ed
- 14:02:51 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #wot-ed