16:52:29 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #webfonts
16:52:29 <RRSAgent> logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/01/18-webfonts-irc
16:52:39 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #webfonts
16:52:52 <chris> rrsagent, make logs public
16:53:02 <Vlad> Vlad has joined #webfonts
16:53:45 <Vlad> rrsagent, start meeting
16:53:45 <RRSAgent> I'm logging. I don't understand 'start meeting', Vlad.  Try /msg RRSAgent help
16:57:19 <Vlad> zakim, who is here?
16:57:19 <Zakim> Present: (no one)
16:57:21 <Zakim> On IRC I see Vlad, Zakim, RRSAgent, chris
16:59:00 <sergeym> sergeym has joined #webfonts
16:59:02 <chris> present+
16:59:10 <Vlad> zakim, start meeting
16:59:10 <Zakim> RRSAgent, make logs Public
16:59:11 <Zakim> Meeting: Web Fonts Working Group Teleconference
16:59:16 <sergeym> present+
16:59:19 <Vlad> present+
17:02:08 <Garret> Garret has joined #webfonts
17:02:11 <jpamental> jpamental has joined #webfonts
17:06:14 <chris> Topic: WOFF2
17:06:15 <chris> https://github.com/w3c/woff/issues/15
17:06:33 <myles> present+ Myles
17:06:41 <myles> myles has joined #webfonts
17:06:54 <Vlad> Topic: https://github.com/w3c/woff/issues/15#issuecomment-1015409619
17:06:54 <jpamental> present+
17:07:02 <myles> present+ myles
17:07:11 <jpamental> present+ jpamental
17:08:17 <chris> scribenick: jpamental
17:08:20 <Vlad> scribenick: jpamental
17:10:56 <chris> Resolution: the four editorial changes are agreed as editorial
17:11:40 <chris> Resolution: publish an updated WOFF2 Recommendation with two proposed corrections
17:12:33 <jpamental> @chris: once we have 2 months of review we can make propose it as a specification. Is there interest in proposing woff2 as an ISO standard?
17:13:33 <chris> dvb references woff 1, should update to woff 2
17:13:43 <jpamental> vlad: yes, this should
17:13:58 <jpamental> vlad: yes we should (fixing typo)
17:15:51 <jpamental> Vlad: when we introduce these changes we should ensure that the test suite is up to date
17:16:04 <chris> rrsagent, here
17:16:04 <RRSAgent> See https://www.w3.org/2022/01/18-webfonts-irc#T17-16-04
17:16:31 <jpamental> @Garret it shouldn't be too bad once I get time to work on it
17:17:13 <jpamental> @Vlad: Chris - do we need to have a second implementation?
17:17:44 <jpamental> @Garret: we could add it to FontTools pretty easily
17:17:51 <jpamental> @Chris - that would be useful to have
17:18:23 <chris> Topic: RangeRequest FPWD
17:18:40 <chris> https://w3c.github.io/IFT/RangeRequest.html
17:18:50 <jpamental> @Vlad - back to the original agenda. If you recall we decided it would be easier if we had the first public working draft before we included Range Request
17:19:26 <jpamental> @Vlad we need to do that now with Range Request to publish that as a working draft before we can merge them
17:20:05 <jpamental> @Chris - it's normal to have open issues. No reason to have that block publishing the first public working draft
17:21:05 <jpamental> Resolution: approved publishing of First Public Working Draft of Range Request
17:21:19 <chris> Topic: Merging
17:22:02 <jpamental> @myles: can we start merging?
17:22:22 <jpamental> @chris: yes we can, but there is overlap that has to be resolved when we do
17:23:43 <jpamental> @chris: top down approach makes sense - I like the structure of Range Request so follow that when bringing it together with Patch Subset
17:25:19 <jpamental> @myles: since it was my idea to split them, it seems like I should be on the hook to merge them
17:25:48 <jpamental> @myles: I'd prefer to do one big PR to mush them together and then start to reorganize
17:26:03 <jpamental> @Garret: no objection
17:26:21 <jpamental> @Vlad: we can postpone next week's call so you have time
17:27:50 <jpamental> myles: I have one topic I'd like to add
17:28:44 <jpamental> myles: I think our spec is coming along well but the biggest unknown for me is the integration with CSS font loading API and how the font display descriptor is going to work
17:29:12 <jpamental> myles: what does it mean/how does it work if you try 'font-display: block' when it's a dynamically loaded font
17:29:25 <jpamental> myles: where should those questions be posed/resolved?
17:29:57 <jpamental> Garret: I think we should create the issue and then take it to the CSSWG with suggested solutions
17:30:15 <jpamental> chris: this avoids open-ended issues in CSSWG which tend to go on forever
17:30:29 <jpamental> myles: ok then I'll open some issues with specific technical questions
17:30:36 <Vlad> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6892
17:32:30 <jpamental> Vlad: anyone have anything else to add to the agenda?
17:32:49 <jpamental> Vlad: chris do we have all the resolutions we need to proceed?
17:32:53 <jpamental> chris: yes we do
17:33:21 <jpamental> Vlad: I will update the invitation to reflect canceling next week's call
17:33:54 <jpamental> Vlad: thank you all!
17:34:16 <Vlad> rrsagent, make minutes
17:34:16 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/01/18-webfonts-minutes.html Vlad
19:27:02 <Zakim> Zakim has left #webfonts