14:58:53 RRSAgent has joined #pwe 14:58:53 logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/01/18-pwe-irc 14:59:00 Zakim has joined #pwe 14:59:08 Meeting: PWE 14:59:15 Date: 2022-01-18 14:59:18 Chair: Liz 14:59:49 Agenda+ Draft Dispute Resolution AOB 14:59:56 present+ 15:00:18 s/Draft Dispute Resolution AOB/Draft Dispute Resolution 15:00:19 Agenda+ AOB 15:02:31 Judy has joined #pwe 15:03:02 Jemma has joined #pwe 15:03:44 regrets+ Charles, Leonie 15:04:12 Liz_Lutgendorff has joined #pwe 15:04:38 scribe+ 15:04:42 present+ Tzviya, Liz, wendyreid, Jemma, Annette 15:04:51 present+ 15:04:53 Liz: [sharing her screen] 15:05:12 annette_g has joined #pwe 15:05:13 ... I looked at various disciplinary/dispute resolution documents 15:05:33 ... if you get to a disciplinary process, it's too late 15:05:45 ... a lot of guidance focuses on resolving issues early or with mediation 15:05:53 present+ Sheila 15:05:57 present+ 15:06:05 sheila has joined #pwe 15:06:08 ... putting the idea out there that this has to happen in dispute resolution processes, you won't get 100% of what you want 15:06:27 ... which is difficult when you are the receiver, but without some give, it can be challenging 15:06:38 ... someone has to wade through the experiences and find a solution 15:07:03 ... the best instance is try to work through the conflict, you won't likely see someone removed from the W3C right away 15:07:16 ... continued instances of dispute leads to escalating consequences 15:07:25 ... this is what I've seen, but I want feedback on what I have done so far 15:07:32 ... first, change the name to dispute resolution 15:07:49 ... goal of getting people to work together to correct behaviours and to be able to continue to work together 15:07:56 ... repairing issues as opposed to discipline 15:08:10 ... mentioned of the CEPC, resolutions will be based on this 15:08:25 ... it's expected for individuals to begin to resolve on their own 15:08:36 .... everyone involved in a dispute process is expected to 15:08:59 ... confidentiality is a question, how much is needed, this is an open question 15:09:12 ... investigation starts when a mediation is impossible 15:09:22 ... like an assault or when resolution attempts have failed 15:09:32 ... timebox of when complaints should be raised 15:10:04 ... you should raise quickly in order to collect evidence or to ensure witnesses are contacted 15:10:12 ... again, for discussion 15:10:26 ... details about investigator is TBD 15:10:37 ... W3M likely needs to be involved and ombuds, etc 15:10:48 ... second section is the types of things that can be done 15:10:51 ... types of mediation 15:11:14 ... be clear about the issue, avoid abusive language, be clear about outcomes 15:11:24 typo: chang for change 15:11:44 Liz_Lutgendorff: who is comfortable with what communication 15:11:49 ... email, in person, etc 15:12:09 ... mediation is a strong preference, a neutral third party to help talk through the problem 15:12:15 ... coming to a healthy resolution 15:12:23 ... who would be these mediators 15:12:40 ... in the UK we have a service, but as an org, do we want to train people, is there an international org we can work with? 15:12:47 ... does it cost money, can we pay for it? 15:12:55 ... goal is to have actions for parties to adhere to 15:13:10 ... and serves as a guideline for future disciplinary action if needed 15:14:17 ... first part is solving the problem individually or with one other party 15:14:21 ... standard best practice 15:14:32 ... mediation is preferred, because it's less punitive 15:14:43 "raise a written complaint using and submit..." - missing word? 15:14:45 ... going directly to disciplinary can lead to someone feeling attacked 15:15:20 ... going directly to an investigation can yield unfavorable results too if situation is unclear or poorly documented 15:15:43 ... with investigations, in general, it's raise a complaint, someone investigates, interviews both sides of the grievance 15:16:05 ... they deliver a report of the situation and an overview of the proposed resolution or verdict 15:16:14 ... not sure how this would work in the W3C 15:16:40 ... if you accumulate too many of these complaints, would there be a process to remove people from groups, from roles, from the organization 15:16:55 ... crowd-sourcing an appropriate disciplinary action 15:17:02 ... who would do this, this is an open question 15:17:22 ... disciplinary actions would be communicated by W3M 15:17:32 ... should we keep these confidential, open? 15:17:38 ... 1. corrective action 15:18:01 ... escalates from there 15:18:09 ... written warning, in person warning 15:18:14 ... final warning 15:18:23 ... culminates in termination of membership 15:18:31 q+ to recommend adding suspension 15:18:34 ... there's areas of question 15:18:38 ... this is the gist of it 15:18:45 tzviya: Thanks Liz 15:18:55 ... I wanted to add suspension as a step 15:18:55 q+ 15:18:59 q+ 15:19:02 ack me 15:19:02 tzviya, you wanted to recommend adding suspension 15:19:10 ack sheila 15:19:12 Liz_Lutgendorff: The others could be removal from a group, removal from a role, etc 15:19:22 sheila: Thanks for this, it's great that its in progress 15:19:27 ... it feels directionally right 15:19:29 ... questions 15:19:39 ... use of the word/phrase "you need to" 15:19:49 ... is this a direction or best practice 15:20:01 ... I think it should be the latter, and maybe soften the language 15:20:19 ... there is a part where communication method is mentioned to be best for both parties 15:20:31 ... if I'm the aggrieved party, that might be frustrating to me 15:20:53 ... the last thing, I like emphasizing the individual conversation step 15:21:10 ... I'm afraid of it feeling like an expectation that everyone starts with resolving themselves 15:21:27 q+ to add a clause about making sure that your safety comes first 15:21:34 ... could we add a clarification to ensure people know there's more options if the issue is sensitive or challenging to someone 15:22:16 Liz_Lutgendorff: I'll add that. In my experience as a union rep, the issues had a broad range, when someone raises an issue, the other party doesn't often agree 15:22:29 ... so the only way to get a resolution is to meet them partway 15:22:41 ... do we want a process that doesn't resolve issues, or meets people where they are 15:22:44 ... it's not ideal 15:23:04 ... it's a challenge to engage people in these situations 15:23:30 ... we have a lot of documentation, people can look at chat records etc 15:23:41 ... one person's micromanagement is another's performance management 15:23:52 ... the challenge is also to find a third party who is neutral to assess this 15:24:12 ack Judy 15:24:13 sheila: If we focus on that process, we just need to soften the language for the aggrieved party 15:24:20 Judy: Few comments, document accessibility 15:24:32 ... if someone is bringing a document to share it in multiple ways 15:24:49 ... it's not accessible to scroll through on screen 15:24:58 ... if someone could forward me the document that would help 15:25:25 ... that said, could you scroll back to the point about assault 15:25:49 Liz_Lutgendorff: I don't have a reference for it, it's just from my government docs 15:25:55 Judy: Assault is relevant here 15:26:04 ... even when mostly virtual as we are now 15:26:21 ... my sense is that drawn heavily from an employment context 15:26:43 ... two concerns, the measures discussed that are most pertinent where there's an employment contect 15:26:49 s/contect/context 15:26:56 ... thank you for the thorough document 15:27:05 ... context matching would be a good next step 15:27:13 ... volunteer vs employment 15:27:32 ... resources are a challenge here too, we're not resourced to handle the policies we do have 15:27:45 ... we're going to need to be advocates to properly resource this 15:28:00 Liz_Lutgendorff: I agree, it's a mix of employment and general dispute guidance in the legal sense 15:28:07 ... usually these things are because of a legal dispute 15:28:12 ... from a volunteer position 15:28:20 ... we have a similar one from when I worked with a charity 15:28:34 ... some of the points are the same, the way you compel people's behaviour do change 15:28:41 ... the sticks are the things you can take away 15:29:01 ... if we can realistically impose these sticks is an issue 15:29:11 ack me 15:29:11 tzviya, you wanted to add a clause about making sure that your safety comes first 15:29:11 ... can we ban someone from being a chair without publishing? 15:29:35 tzviya: I agree with Sheila's comments about emphasizing safety 15:29:42 ... stressing that saffety comes first 15:29:58 ... putting things in writing, etc 15:30:03 ... to respond to Judy 15:30:17 ... this does look like an employee setting, they're more robust 15:30:29 ... but I do have some examples from things like the contributor covenant 15:30:32 https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/2/1/code_of_conduct/ 15:30:42 ... they've added consequences since we've referenced it 15:30:49 https://xoxofest.com/guide/conduct 15:31:09 ... some leave the consequences open, up to staff, I don't think this works for us 15:31:19 ... I think what Liz has presented is close to what we want 15:32:13 Liz_Lutgendorff: There are levels to t his 15:32:19 ... what is realistic for us 15:32:24 ... investigations take a lot of time 15:32:31 ... it's done by staff, you're trained to do it 15:32:57 ... by default, I don't think it should be done by W3C, we should hire out, but it might not be ffeasible 15:33:06 ... if we do use people internally, how do we not overwhelm them 15:33:19 ... resolution can take a long time as well 15:33:37 ... you might have to have further interactions with the individual being investigated 15:33:57 ... there's a balancing act between getting resolution and investigating fully 15:34:06 tzviya: I don't think there's an easy answer here 15:34:20 ... I do think we need to figure out who will be responsible 15:34:26 q+ 15:34:29 ... we do need to take this to W3M 15:34:37 ... we need budget and to determine cost 15:34:50 ... being responsible for this could impact other work 15:35:03 ... third parties, who that would be, costs 15:35:18 ... confidentiality, if we want to understand repeat offenders, we need that information 15:35:23 ack annette_g 15:35:27 Liz_Lutgendorff: I haven't thought about information management 15:35:48 annette_g: I think it makes sense to seek out people outside of W3C to do the mediation 15:35:55 ... the document may not need to mention that 15:36:01 ... the logistics get handled at another time 15:36:23 Liz_Lutgendorff: Luckily the CEPC, it aligns with general working practices on discrimination in the workplace 15:36:42 ... many firms would be focused on the specific laws in a jurisdiction 15:36:55 ... we'd need to find someone who understand overlaps or international contexts 15:37:09 q+ 15:37:10 ... some companies are outsourced HR firms, who specialize in this 15:37:13 ... work on retainer 15:37:16 ack Judy 15:37:28 Judy: Just in response, W3C is not currently a single legal entity 15:37:32 ... we're working on that now 15:37:45 ... in our current state we're an agreement between 4 hosts 15:38:03 ... the employees can have things handled by the HR departments of the hosts 15:38:11 ... there's challenges, different contexts 15:38:33 ... tzviya and I started looking at outsourced dispute resolution, not a lot of progress but worth looking at 15:38:45 tzviya: wseltzer and Judy, would you know if the ??? we're looking at could handle this? 15:38:50 Judy: Not sure 15:39:01 s/???/PEO 15:39:03 ... wseltzer had an idea 15:39:23 q+ 15:39:40 wseltzer: The question that we should be recognizing 15:39:51 ack ws 15:40:12 ... whether we do it through HR or other, we as a group need to make a recommendation to W3M that it's important to community health to do this 15:40:25 ... the budget is a management problem 15:40:51 ... it's important for us here to hear the concerns, raise them to colleagues and the importance of it being an independent function 15:41:00 ... our job here is to raise it's importance 15:41:08 ... I'll take it back to management 15:41:16 tzviya: Next steps, Liz to edit the docs 15:41:42 Liz_Lutgendorff: I'll edit it, please feel free to share any other docs you know, like equivalent docs in your jurisdiction I can add them 15:41:51 ... I'll do some research on cost of mediation 15:41:59 ... there might be other options 15:42:09 ... there was changes to legislation here so there's more in that space 15:42:18 ... please share if you know any 15:42:35 ... I'll do a second draft, maybe in two meetings' time 15:42:38 [JB: whatever we choose, it will need to be internationally facing, not nationally only] 15:42:52 tzviya: Having a sense of how many of these per year would help as well 15:42:57 Liz_Lutgendorff: How big is W3C? 15:43:07 thanks for all your work on draft, Liz. 15:43:09 tzviya: There's about 400 members, but some are one person, some have hundreds 15:43:41 wseltzer: I don't have a number, 600 people to TPAC, 5x times that who participate in WGs and even more participating in CGs or other activities 15:43:59 Liz_Lutgendorff: If anyone is comfortable, could you ask your HR teams? 15:44:14 ... how many disciplinary investigations do you run a year 15:44:27 ... could give us a number 15:44:51 ... I had a caseload of about 200-400/year, and that was just union members 15:45:15 tzviya: Judy made the point that we need to look at international standards and solutions 15:45:34 ... we're very international 15:45:51 ... please share any resources you have 15:46:07 ... next meeting should be about the next steps for the ombuds program 15:46:20 ... AOB? 15:46:43 ... in the last meeting, I talked about the possibility of closing out some issues in the IDCG/PWE GH repos 15:46:50 ... if anyone would like to take some time to review issues 15:46:51 happy to help, tzviya! 15:47:25 thanks all! 15:47:25 ... thanks everyone! 15:47:44 rrsagent, make logs public 15:47:51 rrsagent, make minutes 15:47:51 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/01/18-pwe-minutes.html tzviya