20:48:45 RRSAgent has joined #dxwgdcat 20:48:45 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/11/30-dxwgdcat-irc 20:48:50 RRSAgent, make logs public 20:48:56 RRSAgent, draft minutes 20:48:56 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/11/30-dxwgdcat-minutes.html riccardoAlbertoni 20:49:02 present+ 20:49:21 meeting: DXWG DCAT subgroup 20:49:31 RRSAgent, draft minutes 20:49:31 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/11/30-dxwgdcat-minutes.html riccardoAlbertoni 21:04:12 DaveBrowning has joined #dxwgdcat 21:07:13 RRSAgent, draft minutes 21:07:13 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/11/30-dxwgdcat-minutes.html DaveBrowning 21:07:34 present+ 21:08:39 Makx__ has joined #dxwgdcat 21:10:04 scribe: DaveBrowning 21:10:11 chair: riccardoAlbertoni 21:10:27 RRSAgent, draft minutes 21:10:27 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/11/30-dxwgdcat-minutes.html DaveBrowning 21:12:49 AndreaPerego has joined #dxwgdcat 21:12:55 present+ 21:13:04 PROPOSED: approve last meeting minutes https://www.w3.org/2021/11/16-dxwgdcat-minutes 21:13:07 +1 21:13:14 +1 21:13:15 +1 21:13:29 +1 21:13:37 MakxDekkers has joined #dxwgdcat 21:13:44 RESOLVED: approve last meeting minutes https://www.w3.org/2021/11/16-dxwgdcat-minutes 21:13:51 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2021.11.30 21:14:04 RRSAgent, draft minutes 21:14:04 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/11/30-dxwgdcat-minutes.html DaveBrowning 21:14:10 agenda: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2021.11.30 21:14:18 RRSAgent, draft minutes 21:14:18 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/11/30-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:15:05 q+ 21:15:21 ack 21:15:46 AndreaPerego: I see that Annette has raised some questions/issues via the mailing list 21:15:58 ....on the DCAT WD 21:17:03 riccardoAlbertoni: Vote was generally positive, and procedure does allow for some disagreement on WD 21:17:39 ... Chair can move it forward. But there has been silence on all channels 21:18:23 AndreaPerego: Understand the open issues so Annette is not wrong but we planned to use WD to get feedback 21:18:59 ... usually we have approval from everyone. 21:19:14 riccardoAlbertoni: I have asked Peter what he intends.... 21:19:43 q+ 21:19:52 ack AndreaPerego 21:19:57 ack DaveBrowning 21:21:17 DaveBrowning: The plenary had limited attendance and so discussion wasn't possible 21:21:30 topic: Dataset series 21:22:00 topic: Concerns on DCAT-AP 21:23:08 MakxDekkers: Currently looking at national profiles. Some implementers are against creating data sets for time series for geographical data 21:24:13 s/topic: Dataset series// 21:24:27 ... Some previous practice used more of a 'bag' approach, and some have been using this for data series 21:25:01 ...been a long lasting discussion (at least 2016) 21:25:35 q+ 21:25:46 ... Recent discussion has now come through to issues in DXWG github, so we now have an open discussion 21:26:29 ... Clearly divergent approaches - 'dropping files into data set 'bag of resources'' 21:26:54 ... We have discussed before - it depends on the workflow practices 21:27:48 ... Some practitioners don't want to put effort into description etc 21:28:37 ... This leads to duplication - might be easier for producer but not consumer will need to cope with both/either 21:29:27 ... We now faced with (sub)group of implementers who want to persist their current workflow for publishing 21:30:46 ack AndreaPerego 21:30:57 ... DCAT 3 provides what we think is better way but we need to have a coherant approach to the subgroup practice 21:32:18 AndreaPerego: Question - when we have these discussions, do they appreciate we aren't banning the existing practice, but providing the series approach 21:32:28 ... based on other implementations 21:33:32 ...Do the people resisting realise we aren't being prescriptive? That it may take time for people to move or adapt 21:34:11 +q 21:34:38 MakxDekkers: We have the base DCAT approach where there is lattitude, but we have a network of implementers who need/want to be consistant 21:35:14 ... Is the recommendation clear enough on this? 21:35:44 ...I think the rec is very clear about how to do it if you 'come from outside' 21:35:54 ... with no legacy 21:36:00 q+ 21:37:50 ... For example if you have series at distribution then properties can end up being copied from Dataset (since they might change over time, for example) 21:38:00 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/wiki/Examples-on-dataset-series 21:38:16 rrsagent, draft minutes 21:38:16 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/11/30-dxwgdcat-minutes.html DaveBrowning 21:38:56 riccardoAlbertoni: I agree with the point/concerns 21:39:48 ... but intent was to bias it towards 'series at dataset' but not prescriptive since we know there is existing practices 21:40:18 MakxDekkers: That seems not so desirable - if a standard has too many options it makes it more complicated 21:41:21 q? 21:41:28 ack riccardoAlbertoni 21:41:35 ack AndreaPerego 21:41:42 riccardoAlbertoni: Intention was not to be evenhanded but to bias to our way (supported by use cases), but agree current draft needs to be better explained/examples 21:42:32 AndreaPerego: My recollection is that the text was to reflect the current practice specifically 21:42:57 inSeries property note says "Normally, child datasets in dataset series are represented as dcat:Dataset. The use of dcat:Distribution for typing child datasets is however recognized as a possible alternative, whenever it addresses more effectively the requirements of a given application scenario." 21:43:13 ... Perhaps we have been overly cautious. Would like to say 'we have a solution - based on use cases' 21:43:55 ... but people are doing things differently. 21:44:30 q+ 21:44:50 ... as it stands their approach is conformant but conceptually its quite different 21:45:00 ack MakxDekkers 21:45:02 ... We could make this more explicit 21:46:18 MakxDekkers: It says in section 12.3 that we expect people to change on way to DCAT 3. 21:46:56 ... from a DCAT-AP implementation angle this risk of multiple approaches is quite worrying 21:48:15 ... Could the spec be made more prescriptive ? Remove the 'not formally incompatible' comment? 21:49:03 MakxDekkers: Key question - does DXWG want to be more presciptive.....? 21:50:25 riccardoAlbertoni: One issue is whether we would have implementation evidence for the new approach in time for publication 21:50:41 q+ 21:50:57 ack AndreaPerego 21:50:59 RRSAgent, draft minutes 21:50:59 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/11/30-dxwgdcat-minutes.html DaveBrowning 21:52:17 AndreaPerego: These changes/extensions were motivated by provided use cases.. perhaps we can check, but we shouldn't rely just on that 21:53:05 riccardoAlbertoni: In SKOS they used 'feature at risk', so perhaps we could 21:53:49 q+ 21:54:02 ack AndreaPerego 21:54:04 ...suggest a clear direction, but mark the feature as 'at risk' and if there is no evidence by approval time....? 21:54:47 AndreaPerego: I think there will be implementations. But also that they are different conceptually from some existing practice 21:55:44 ... Question - do the implementers that have raised issues have any way forward 21:56:12 MakxDekkers: They aren't keen on the new features and would potentially not use them 21:57:53 ... and not change their systems. Since we have potentially divergent paths here, we do need to be sure that DXWG is okay with that. We have a new solution - elegant even - but some existent practictioners 21:58:07 ... may not be able to change 21:59:14 ... People may keep doing what they are doing since they have tools, training etc 22:00:22 AndreaPerego: Would using more modularity provide an options (thinking aloud...) 22:01:10 MakxDekkers: Probably needs the plenary to discuss/agree the risks/outcomes of these newer features 22:01:56 AndreaPerego: And also might apply to versioning changes 22:03:13 ... we have clear use cases for more sophisticated versioning, different from what people do now 22:04:12 MakxDekkers: On versioning, feedback from implementers has been positive 22:07:38 ... Question for larger group is whether we provide multiple ways and leave to implementers.... 22:08:55 RRSAgent, draft minutes 22:08:55 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/11/30-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 22:09:16 AndreaPerego: We should probably sleep on this and find a way. to raise at the plenary 22:09:46 riccardoAlbertoni: Out of time now... 22:09:52 RRSAgent, draft minutes 22:09:52 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/11/30-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 22:21:06 RRSAgent, draft minutes 22:21:06 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/11/30-dxwgdcat-minutes.html riccardoAlbertoni 22:24:32 present+ MakxDekkers 22:24:39 RRSAgent, draft minutes 22:24:39 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/11/30-dxwgdcat-minutes.html riccardoAlbertoni