16:55:20 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #webfonts
16:55:20 <RRSAgent> logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/11/16-webfonts-irc
16:55:34 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #webfonts
17:01:55 <Garret> Garret has joined #webfonts
17:02:22 <sergeym> sergeym has joined #webfonts
17:03:50 <chris> chris has joined #webfonts
17:05:21 <Garret> present+
17:05:24 <Vlad> present+
17:05:27 <chris> present+
17:05:27 <sergeym> present+
17:05:41 <myles> myles has joined #webfonts
17:10:36 <Vlad> Topic: 1.	Update on Server Conformance Tests and COLRv1 IFT Demo
17:11:03 <Vlad> Quick demo of COLRv1 Emoji IFT test
17:11:49 <Garret> https://fonts.gstatic.com/experimental/patch_subset/colrv1.html
17:12:57 <chris> wfm on Canary 98
17:13:51 <Vlad> Updates on server test, see https://github.com/w3c/ift-server-tests
17:13:52 <chris> q+
17:17:02 <Vlad> ack chris
17:18:04 <Garret> vlad: couple of new issues in the last few weeks
17:18:10 <Garret> vlad: let's go through the list
17:18:25 <chris> q+
17:18:38 <Vlad> Topic: IFT open issues https://github.com/w3c/IFT/issues
17:19:50 <Garret> vlad: first one (#43) single origin restriction. already good discussion there. Should we accept suggestion to make a note.
17:19:56 <Garret> Chris: yes
17:20:18 <Garret> Chris: I'll edit the spec
17:20:42 <Garret> Vlad: next is fingerprinting analysis #42
17:21:59 <Garret> Vlad: question about using font for fingerprinting, I though fonts that are dynamically loaded can't be used. Only installed ones
17:22:05 <Garret> Chris: yeah
17:23:10 <Garret> Myles: one thing that ios/macos does is does not expose information about user installed fonts to the web. That effectively solves this problem.
17:23:28 <Garret> Vlad: don't see this as a relevant issue to incxfer.
17:26:02 <Garret> Vlad: data points are not available outside of the origin.
17:26:27 <Garret> Chris: I can follow up on the issue.
17:28:31 <Garret> Vlad: next issue 41.
17:28:44 <Garret> Garret: responded explaining we don't want to specify subsetter behaviour.
17:29:55 <Garret> Vlad: issue also touches the codepoint vs glyph in the evaluation.
17:30:21 <Garret> Garret: my response also touches on this explaining the evaluation was done with both glyphs (range request) and codepoints (patch subset)
17:38:48 <Garret> Vlad: so think we still need to have a statement in the spec that explains what glyph coverage issues a subsetter needs to be aware of (eg. stylistic sets, layout rules, glyph variants)
17:39:16 <Garret> Garret: ok that can be added, would like to do it as an informative section, and keep the equivalence requirement as the normative requirement enforcing that.
17:40:07 <Garret> Garret: I'll take this on
17:42:17 <Garret> Myles: planning on posting the range request draft today.
17:42:41 <Garret> Vlad: update not related to incxfer, small change in woff2 corrections.
17:43:07 <Garret> Vlad: one was backtracked from candidate correction to editorial.
17:43:23 <Garret> Chris: I was over cautious, but was told review not need and to back it off.
17:45:33 <Garret> Vlad: let's target dec. 7th for the next call.
17:45:36 <Garret> Garret: sounds good.
17:46:47 <Vlad> rrsagent, make minutes
17:46:47 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/11/16-webfonts-minutes.html Vlad
17:59:59 <Vlad> rrsagent, make minutes
17:59:59 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/11/16-webfonts-minutes.html Vlad
19:44:09 <Zakim> Zakim has left #webfonts