IRC log of webfonts on 2021-11-16
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 16:55:20 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #webfonts
- 16:55:20 [RRSAgent]
- logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/11/16-webfonts-irc
- 16:55:34 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #webfonts
- 17:01:55 [Garret]
- Garret has joined #webfonts
- 17:02:22 [sergeym]
- sergeym has joined #webfonts
- 17:03:50 [chris]
- chris has joined #webfonts
- 17:05:21 [Garret]
- present+
- 17:05:24 [Vlad]
- present+
- 17:05:27 [chris]
- present+
- 17:05:27 [sergeym]
- present+
- 17:05:41 [myles]
- myles has joined #webfonts
- 17:10:36 [Vlad]
- Topic: 1.Update on Server Conformance Tests and COLRv1 IFT Demo
- 17:11:03 [Vlad]
- Quick demo of COLRv1 Emoji IFT test
- 17:11:49 [Garret]
- https://fonts.gstatic.com/experimental/patch_subset/colrv1.html
- 17:12:57 [chris]
- wfm on Canary 98
- 17:13:51 [Vlad]
- Updates on server test, see https://github.com/w3c/ift-server-tests
- 17:13:52 [chris]
- q+
- 17:17:02 [Vlad]
- ack chris
- 17:18:04 [Garret]
- vlad: couple of new issues in the last few weeks
- 17:18:10 [Garret]
- vlad: let's go through the list
- 17:18:25 [chris]
- q+
- 17:18:38 [Vlad]
- Topic: IFT open issues https://github.com/w3c/IFT/issues
- 17:19:50 [Garret]
- vlad: first one (#43) single origin restriction. already good discussion there. Should we accept suggestion to make a note.
- 17:19:56 [Garret]
- Chris: yes
- 17:20:18 [Garret]
- Chris: I'll edit the spec
- 17:20:42 [Garret]
- Vlad: next is fingerprinting analysis #42
- 17:21:59 [Garret]
- Vlad: question about using font for fingerprinting, I though fonts that are dynamically loaded can't be used. Only installed ones
- 17:22:05 [Garret]
- Chris: yeah
- 17:23:10 [Garret]
- Myles: one thing that ios/macos does is does not expose information about user installed fonts to the web. That effectively solves this problem.
- 17:23:28 [Garret]
- Vlad: don't see this as a relevant issue to incxfer.
- 17:26:02 [Garret]
- Vlad: data points are not available outside of the origin.
- 17:26:27 [Garret]
- Chris: I can follow up on the issue.
- 17:28:31 [Garret]
- Vlad: next issue 41.
- 17:28:44 [Garret]
- Garret: responded explaining we don't want to specify subsetter behaviour.
- 17:29:55 [Garret]
- Vlad: issue also touches the codepoint vs glyph in the evaluation.
- 17:30:21 [Garret]
- Garret: my response also touches on this explaining the evaluation was done with both glyphs (range request) and codepoints (patch subset)
- 17:38:48 [Garret]
- Vlad: so think we still need to have a statement in the spec that explains what glyph coverage issues a subsetter needs to be aware of (eg. stylistic sets, layout rules, glyph variants)
- 17:39:16 [Garret]
- Garret: ok that can be added, would like to do it as an informative section, and keep the equivalence requirement as the normative requirement enforcing that.
- 17:40:07 [Garret]
- Garret: I'll take this on
- 17:42:17 [Garret]
- Myles: planning on posting the range request draft today.
- 17:42:41 [Garret]
- Vlad: update not related to incxfer, small change in woff2 corrections.
- 17:43:07 [Garret]
- Vlad: one was backtracked from candidate correction to editorial.
- 17:43:23 [Garret]
- Chris: I was over cautious, but was told review not need and to back it off.
- 17:45:33 [Garret]
- Vlad: let's target dec. 7th for the next call.
- 17:45:36 [Garret]
- Garret: sounds good.
- 17:46:47 [Vlad]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 17:46:47 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/11/16-webfonts-minutes.html Vlad
- 17:59:59 [Vlad]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 17:59:59 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/11/16-webfonts-minutes.html Vlad
- 19:44:09 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #webfonts