14:14:34 RRSAgent has joined #wcag-act 14:14:34 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/11/04-wcag-act-irc 14:14:50 wilco: annual review of published rules 14:15:06 ... image has non-empty accessible name is good 14:15:41 ... HTML lang is valid language tag has some changes for it 14:16:02 ... PR #1738 needs to merge 14:16:17 trevor: add me as a reviewer 14:16:30 will: also add me as reviewer 14:17:22 wilco: leave this one open until PR resolved 14:17:55 .. PR #1737 editorial 14:18:10 daniel and trevor: will review 14:18:48 wilco: leave open until PR approved 14:19:19 zakim, take up next 14:19:19 agendum 2 -- Open ACT pull requests -- taken up [from Wilco_] 14:21:14 wilco: PR 1739 - 2 examples to review 14:21:39 ... add kathy and daniel as reviewers 14:23:15 ... other PRs for CG 14:23:20 zakim, take up next 14:23:20 agendum 3 -- Rules format update -- taken up [from Wilco_] 14:23:51 https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/522 14:24:38 wilco: PR to add definition of implementation to ACT Rules format 14:25:00 ... what a consistent or partial implementation is 14:25:54 wilco: try to match terminology up with VPATs? 14:27:04 ... added more plain language descriptions 14:27:34 will: how do we verify complete? 14:29:07 wilco: what a tool report for rule test cases. do all passed report as passed, failed report as failed 14:29:32 ... partially consistent - a failed example reports as pass 14:33:11 KarenHerr has joined #wcag-act 14:33:12 ... added SC mapping under Complete 14:33:15 present+ 14:34:22 trevor: add reasoning and example would be helpful 14:35:27 wilco: of concern is for example, reporting a AA failure and AAA failure 14:36:32 kathy: if not claiming AAA would reporting the AAA failure be necessary? 14:36:52 wilco: drafted statement seems too strict 14:38:02 trevor: how about can report either SC but not more 14:39:39 wilco: or, report only by conformance level 14:41:05 trevor: if we don't have the SC requirement, implementers only need to pass/fail the examples. not sure that is enough 14:41:24 wilco: IBM reports only 1 SC per rule 14:41:44 ... picking the SC they prefer. is that a problem? 14:42:32 karen: some only report the highest severity 14:42:40 ... affects scoring 14:42:46 q+ 14:43:17 wilco: it is correct that multiple SCs are applicable 14:45:18 kathy: TT would fail all SCs 14:46:12 karen: let IBM pick the SC. they would need to defend it 14:46:29 wilco: if statement left in, ACT is removing that choice 14:47:58 daniel: see both sides 14:48:53 wilco: if an implementation tests image buttons and text buttons in one procedure, will only report 4.1.2. Need a separate procedures for image buttons 14:49:32 ... SC mapping would constrain implementations 14:49:59 0 14:50:23 -1 - think something is needed but this isn't quite right 14:50:49 +1 14:51:55 karen: with trevor 14:52:52 trevor: wants people to show their work, just passing/failing isn't enough 14:53:54 wilco: poll to move forward without SC mapping (line 533) 14:55:10 ... currently not tracking any SC now 14:55:17 trevor: can it be optional? 14:57:04 kathy: without SC mappings we aren't establishing conformance testing consistency 14:58:08 wilco (chair hat off): agree, feel it's important to have for improving consistency 15:00:21 wilco: will try to add more on conformance levels, different standards, example 15:01:42 rrsagent, make minutes v1 15:01:42 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/11/04-wcag-act-minutes.html dmontalvo 15:02:16 rrsagent, make logs public 15:02:18 rrsagent, make minutes v1 15:02:18 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/11/04-wcag-act-minutes.html dmontalvo 15:26:12 hdv has joined #wcag-act 17:24:41 stevelee_ has joined #wcag-act