00:28:06 dsr has joined #wot 01:29:09 dsr has joined #wot 02:30:15 dsr has joined #wot 03:31:40 dsr has joined #wot 03:56:16 kaz has joined #wot 04:32:22 dsr has joined #wot 05:13:57 zkis has joined #wot 05:33:24 dsr has joined #wot 06:00:22 dsr has joined #wot 07:19:29 dsr has joined #wot 07:37:32 dsr has joined #wot 07:53:40 dsr has joined #wot 08:27:15 zkis has joined #wot 11:10:22 dsr has joined #wot 11:11:05 zkis has joined #wot 11:23:35 McCool has joined #wot 11:32:06 dsr has joined #wot 11:53:19 dsr has joined #wot 11:57:49 takio has joined #wot 11:58:00 rrsagent, bye 11:58:00 I see no action items 11:58:10 RRSAgent has joined #wot 11:58:10 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/10/14-wot-irc 11:58:21 meeting: WoT Open Day - Day 2 11:58:45 present+ Kaz_Ashimura, Van_Cu_Pham 11:59:01 present+ Takio_Yamaoka, Arturo_Romero 11:59:38 present+ Tetsushi_Matsuda 11:59:56 present+ Hiroshi_Ota 12:00:05 present+ Michael_McCool 12:00:34 present+ Kunihiko_Toumura 12:00:39 ktoumura has joined #wot 12:02:05 present+ Gabriel_Romero 12:02:11 present+ Ege_Korkan 12:02:26 present+ Miguel_Romero 12:02:32 Mizushima has joined #wot 12:02:36 present+ Michael_Koster, Tomoaki_Mizushima 12:02:53 McCool has joined #wot 12:03:02 mjk has joined #wot 12:03:28 agenda: https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/F2F_meeting,_October_2021#Oct_14_-_Open_Day 12:03:30 ota has joined #wot 12:03:35 Gabriel_Romero has joined #wot 12:03:46 matsuda has joined #wot 12:04:25 present+ Andrea_Cimmino, Daniel_Peintner 12:04:37 Pham has joined #wot 12:04:38 Ege has joined #wot 12:05:03 dape has joined #wot 12:05:46 topic: Scribe 12:05:52 kaz and tbd 12:06:02 i/kaz/scribenick: kaz/ 12:06:10 topic: Agenda 12:06:43 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot/blob/main/PRESENTATIONS/2021-10-online-f2f/2021-10-14-WoT-OpenDay-McCool.pdf McCool's slides 12:06:57 mm: (goes though the agenda slides) 12:07:22 ... ECHONET, SDW, brak and Netzo 12:07:34 topic: Guests 12:07:50 -> https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20170801/ W3C Patent Policy 12:08:02 mm: please be aware of the W3C Patent Policy above 12:08:10 ... also the minutes will be publicly published 12:08:23 present+ Kotis_K 12:08:39 mm: resources 12:08:48 .. Wiki and Presentations 12:09:05 -> https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/F2F_meeting,_October_2021 vF2F wiki 12:09:21 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot/tree/main/PRESENTATIONS/2021-10-online-f2f presentation area 12:09:30 dsr has joined #wot 12:09:31 mm: please upload your slides there 12:09:37 ... PDF preferred 12:10:07 present+ Philipp_Blum, Sebastian_Kaebisch 12:10:18 present+ Fady_Salama 12:10:43 topic: Self intro 12:10:57 ar: Arturo Romero, CEO of Netzo 12:11:12 s/Self/Guests' self/ 12:12:07 ... Miguel and Gabriel also from Netzo 12:12:22 ho: Hiroshi Ota from Yahoo Japan 12:13:05 present+ Konstantinos_Kotis 12:13:44 mm: Van_Cu_Pham from ECHONET 12:13:57 ty: Takio Yamaoka from Yahoo Japan 12:14:11 topic: ECHONET 12:14:26 cris has joined #wot 12:14:26 -> @@@slides 12:14:53 tm: tx for giving this opportunity 12:15:15 ... ECHONET Consortium Liaison Activity 12:15:18 ... Agenda 12:15:25 ... liaison acitivities 12:15:29 ... plugfest results 12:15:45 ... mapping ECHONET Device Description 12:16:02 ... starting with Liaison activities 12:16:07 ... Use Case Proposal 12:16:16 ... Leaving and Coming Home 12:16:18 sebastian has joined #wot 12:16:46 ... (goes through the ECHONET use case which is already included in the Use Cases draft) 12:16:49 ... Plugfest 12:17:01 ... provided four ECHONET Lite devices 12:17:06 ... via intermediary 12:17:44 ... LED, air conditioner, illuminance sensor, temperature sensor 12:17:50 ... developed by Pham-san 12:18:00 ... Plugfest Results (1) 12:18:18 ... Hitachi connected to the Echonet dvices using Nod-RED 12:18:30 ... Fujitsu also connected using their local proxy 12:18:34 ... TUM also 12:18:43 ... Plugfest Results (2) 12:18:53 ... Toumura-san raised some issue 12:19:08 ... on direct access to the ECHONET Lite Web API 12:19:18 present+ Cristiano_Atuzzi 12:19:28 present+ Michael_Lagally 12:19:59 ... for this plugfest, we access ECHONET device via a gateway, though 12:20:05 ryuichi has joined #wot 12:20:27 ... by adding the encapsulating object schema, it might be possible to accept it directly 12:20:33 q+ 12:20:39 ... that proposal can be an option 12:21:09 ... however, not sure how to handle the value combination, e.g., "rgb" 12:21:39 ... the real property value is "r" something, "g" something and "b" something 12:21:52 ... Mapping ECHONET Device Description to TD 12:22:03 ... Example: General Lighting (1) 12:22:12 ... DD on the left side and TD on the right side 12:22:31 present+ Ryuichi_Matsukura 12:22:38 rrsagent, make log public 12:22:42 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:22:42 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/10/14-wot-minutes.html kaz 12:23:06 present+ Youngmin_Ji 12:23:51 ... binding template is additionally generated for TD 12:24:24 q+ 12:24:24 ... e.g., "op" with "readallproperties" 12:24:37 ... Summary of mapping from DD to TD 12:25:01 ... @context for ECHONET Lite Web API added 12:25:25 ... "id" in TD generated automatically based on "deviceType" and "deviceId" 12:25:31 KiK has joined #wot 12:25:41 ... "title" taken from "deviceType" 12:25:56 ... HTTP message translation 12:26:03 ... Read One Property 12:26:32 Miguel has joined #wot 12:26:44 .. WoT on the left side and ECHOENT on the right side 12:27:04 ... translate the target path if needed 12:27:26 ... read request, read response 12:27:28 ... then 12:27:37 ... write request, write response 12:27:58 dsr has joined #wot 12:27:59 ... translate the target path if needed 12:28:20 ... translate the HTTP body to property/value pair 12:28:43 ... then return empty HTTP body with code 200 OK 12:29:31 ... ECHONET has updated property, though 12:29:42 ... Summary of the HTTP Message Translation 12:29:57 ... target path of read and write request is translated if needed 12:30:15 ... ECHOENT Lite Web API reads response HTTP message body 12:30:21 ... thanks 12:30:23 q? 12:30:40 q? 12:30:47 sk: tx! 12:30:54 ... question about slide 8 12:30:58 ... payload structure 12:31:42 ... "PlugFest Result (2)" 12:32:03 ... client requests the RGB value 12:32:20 ... and the question is how the payload structure is like 12:32:42 ... similar problem with Philips Hue as well 12:32:51 ... what can we do using TD? 12:33:22 ... subprotocol problem or binding template problem? 12:33:27 mlagally_ has joined #wot 12:33:31 ... we need to clarify the situation 12:33:38 ... and then improve the specs 12:33:40 q? 12:33:52 q? 12:33:53 tm: personally think it's issue with binding templates 12:34:15 q+ 12:34:22 q+ 12:34:42 q+ 12:34:49 ... using sub protocol might be a feasible option, though 12:35:23 ask se 12:35:27 ack se 12:35:32 s/ask se// 12:35:56 mm: agree we definitely need clarification 12:36:01 ... my question is about p9 12:36:09 ... Example: General Lighting (1) 12:36:40 ... issue about the ID 12:37:06 ... this time "echonet" prefix is used 12:37:16 ... need some clean up 12:37:23 tm: tx for your comment 12:37:33 ... I appreciate it 12:37:45 ... no detailed discussion how to generate the ID 12:37:53 ... so this is just an example 12:37:54 I'm confused by the payload issue. Why is { "r": 20, "g": 200, "b"10 } acceptable where { "brightness": 80 } is not 12:38:26 q+ mjk 12:38:57 mm: my second point is, should the "id" be always a URL? 12:39:19 ... that's rather a question to myself 12:39:24 q? 12:39:26 ack mc 12:39:30 ack ege 12:39:34 ek: tx 12:39:37 ... very detailed 12:39:58 ... payload on p7 12:40:04 ... schema problem? 12:40:08 dsr has joined #wot 12:40:15 tm: this was proposal from Toumura-san 12:40:20 ark_ has joined #wot 12:40:40 arturo_romero_netzo has joined #wot 12:41:23 ek: highly indesirable for an intermediary to process the conversion 12:41:36 ... counter requirement for interoperability 12:41:51 ... put the full schema 12:42:08 ... for consumer to consider 12:42:10 q? 12:42:18 +1 12:42:26 tm: yeah, that's right 12:43:20 ... ECHONET Lite Web API's Device Description describes {"r": 20, "g": 255, "b": 0} 12:43:44 ek: what part of the properties to be converted is handled by the Binding 12:44:00 tm: thanks to Toumura-san, we've noticed this issue 12:44:15 ack k 12:46:15 kaz: we should continue to think about variety of property structure from existing standards 12:46:21 ack ml 12:46:35 ... should look into exsiting mechanisms and then think about how to solve the problem 12:46:50 ml: Oracle Cloud IoT platform 12:47:03 ... also handled RGB mapping 12:47:17 ... encoding the structure into property combination 12:47:29 ... so this is my second time to see this issue 12:47:36 s/exsiting/existing/ 12:48:03 ... we should this as one of the specific examples to solve the issues 12:48:16 ... would agree we need to solve this issue for TD 12:48:18 q? 12:48:46 mjk: tx for ECHONET to participate first :) 12:48:52 ... potential endpoint for WoT 12:49:00 ... great presentation 12:49:10 ... need discussion for this issue 12:49:25 ... my assumption is data schema part of TD is on the wire 12:49:42 ... agree the problem is a long-standing one 12:49:44 ./property combination/property combination: rgb_r, rgb_g, rgb_b/ 12:49:49 s/property combination/property combination: rgb_r, rgb_g, rgb_b/ 12:50:06 ... information model 12:50:24 ... we do need to have a sort of abstract data schema 12:50:27 ... unbound way 12:50:37 ... and another wired schema 12:50:49 s/solve this issue for TD/solve this specific issue of encoding a rgb color in the TD/ 12:50:58 ... maybe protocol binding used for the conversion 12:51:03 ack mjk 12:51:12 q? 12:51:19 tm: thank YOU for your comment 12:51:28 ... defining schema in abstract format? 12:51:52 q+ 12:52:01 ... and another wire data schema 12:52:15 ... that is the purpose of the binding. right? 12:52:26 mjk: data schema was part of binding originally 12:52:34 ... but getting another view 12:52:58 ... semantic schema never changes but protocol schema could change 12:53:03 tm: I see 12:53:06 q? 12:53:12 ack e 12:53:33 ek: ECHONET can write a binding template? 12:53:35 I like mjk proposed solution. +1 we already have schemas on forms with additionalExpectedResponses 12:53:43 tm: can't answer right now 12:54:01 ... need discussion on the ECHONET side 12:54:09 ... and would like to continue via the liaison 12:54:10 q_ 12:54:12 q+ 12:54:16 s/q_// 12:55:37 q? 12:55:46 kaz: we should simply ask matsuda san and ECHONET to work with us to improve the Binding Template Note 12:55:49 ek: ok 12:56:25 tm: let's continue the discussion offline 12:56:28 kaz: ok 12:56:36 mm: should wrap up 12:57:11 ... seems SDW group has issue on WebEx connection 12:57:23 ... so would suggest we take break earlier 12:57:48 [10-min break] 12:57:54 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:57:54 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/10/14-wot-minutes.html kaz 13:05:02 ScottSimmons has joined #wot 13:05:14 PeterRushforth has joined #wot 13:05:23 jtandy has joined #wot 13:05:37 RobSmith has joined #wot 13:05:38 Linda_van_den_Brink has joined #wot 13:05:38 present+ jtandy 13:05:42 present+ ScottSimmons 13:06:17 present+ Linda_van_den_Brink 13:06:24 present+ 13:06:36 present+ RobSmith 13:08:36 topic: Preliminary for the SDW collaboration 13:09:00 topic: TD issue based on ECHONET discussion 13:09:05 s/topic: Preliminary for the SDW collaboration// 13:09:24 ek: would create a TD issue unless somebody else would 13:09:33 mm: go ahead and put the URL here on the IRC 13:09:44 topic: SDW collaboration 13:10:09 jt: Jeremy Tandy, the Chair of the SDW group (co-Chair is Linda) 13:10:23 ... collaborating with OGC 13:10:41 ... Scott and Linda also here 13:11:23 linda: Linda van den Brink from Geonovum 13:11:29 ... member of W3C and also OGC 13:11:45 ... chairing the SDW group with Scott 13:11:52 s/Scott/Jeremy/ 13:12:06 ... Scott, you can also introduce yourself 13:12:18 Scott: Scott Simmons from OGC 13:12:54 jt: a few more people from SDW 13:13:07 br: Bill Roberts 13:13:18 ... very interested to here 13:13:26 pr: Peter Rushforth 13:13:27 sebastian has joined #wot 13:13:51 rs: Rob Smith 13:14:45 roba: Rob @@@ from OGC 13:15:16 jvu: Joost van Ulden 13:15:43 topic: Note for guests 13:15:55 mm: please be aware of the W3C Patent Policy 13:16:05 topic: Spatial Data on the Web and WoT Geolocation 13:16:15 mm: (shows the slides) 13:16:33 i|shows|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot/tree/main/PRESENTATIONS/2021-10-online-f2f McCool's slides| 13:16:40 ... WoT working on discovery as well 13:16:49 ... including geospatial discovery 13:17:01 ... want to integrate with the existing standards 13:17:08 ... and include best practices 13:17:28 ... use cases are smart cities, smart homes, automotives, etc. 13:17:45 ... geolocation data to cover various use cases 13:18:07 ... include data description or getting that from the device (or both) 13:18:16 ... Geolocation Project Report 13:18:39 ... geolocation requirements have been discussed 13:18:49 ... also issue with query 13:19:07 s/also/encoding of geolocation data. also/ 13:19:18 ... creating a group Note 13:19:34 ... how to encode and use geolocation data for WoT purposes 13:19:42 ... develop a working document 13:20:02 ... presentation on Monday, Oct 11 about smart building 13:20:18 ... also requirements from Singapore 13:20:27 ... we need to collaborate (with SDW) 13:20:39 ... Collaborations Needed 13:20:59 ... concrete set of recommendations needed 13:21:23 ... Next Steps 13:21:30 ... some proposals myself 13:21:42 ... but would ask the SDW group for advice 13:22:03 jt: bring the people working on the topic into the loop 13:22:21 ... key initiative in the geolocation area is MGCTI API 13:22:31 s/MGCTI/OGC/ 13:22:39 ... how to interact with geospatial data 13:23:01 ... covers query 13:23:13 ... common features and records 13:23:20 ... are you aware of that work? 13:23:22 mm: yes 13:23:39 ... the question is we have our own discovery spec 13:23:56 ... which part to be reused/imported? 13:24:10 ... we need to capture the plan 13:24:45 ... my hope is basic discovery for WoT first during this charter period 13:25:10 ... and the question is do we need informative thing first? 13:25:24 ... other things also going on 13:25:28 ... and wanted to ask you 13:26:09 ... in addition to OGC, IEEE P287 working on geolocation, time series data, interval queries, etc. 13:26:13 jt: yes 13:26:22 ... time and space together 13:27:04 mm: acceleration, velocity, etc., are not well handled for robotics, etc. 13:27:22 ... alignment with the existing W3C specs would be good 13:27:40 jt: Scott, you've been involved in IEEE, ISO, etc. 13:27:52 ... any other touch points? 13:28:19 ... identifying some common patterns both in WoT doing and OGC is doing 13:28:27 ... aim converge at some point 13:28:37 ... thinking about same query, etc. 13:28:46 ... any ideas from SDW? 13:29:02 ss: OGC APIs and the features 13:29:10 ... convenient API to handle data 13:29:30 ... but if there is some existing work on the WoT side 13:29:40 ... would see that 13:30:04 ... bigger convenient API may or may not be usable 13:30:29 ... would see the intersections 13:31:43 mm: we have discussion on descriptive vs prescriptive 13:32:09 ... big problem with IoT is out-of-box interoperability 13:32:23 ... would have recommended practices 13:32:39 ... but what are those recommended practices 13:33:09 ra: Rob Atkinson 13:33:29 ... bunch of different pints 13:33:46 ... different aspects of interoperability 13:34:21 ... distinction among methods for bunch of stuff 13:34:51 ... exact same sensors should work the same, but what if put in different locations? 13:35:03 ... collaboration with WoT, starting with the data 13:35:42 ... another aspect 13:36:00 ... commonality of implementation 13:36:40 ... a profile of SSN for WoT purpose may be useful 13:36:49 ... and finally 13:37:00 ... where the touch point is? 13:37:40 ... have to work on interoperability across different platforms 13:37:43 mm: yeah 13:37:51 ... might have particular use cases 13:38:03 ... and put some common one 13:38:18 ... on the other hand, would get a bigger picture for the next step 13:38:44 ... we're looking at JSON-LD for vocabulary extension 13:38:58 ... also experimental extension for JSON 13:39:26 ... would figure out some compromise 13:39:42 ... issue of encoding for the short term 13:39:52 ... and then privacy concern 13:40:05 ... need to figure out possible solutions 13:40:30 jt: we have a group preparing for a Note 13:40:48 ... bunch of work in hand 13:40:53 ... looking at privacy issues 13:41:02 ... in terms of starting with small part 13:41:19 ... encoding geolocation data using JSON-LD? 13:41:24 mm: yes, JSON-LD 13:41:35 ... specifically WoT Thing Description based on JSON-LD 13:41:50 ... data schema for actual definition 13:41:58 ... how to unify the things for queries 13:42:03 ... struggling with that 13:42:05 Responsible Use of Spatial Data: https://w3c.github.io/sdw/responsible-use/ 13:42:08 ... still a proposal 13:42:19 jt: query pattern 13:42:22 ... you're using 13:42:33 ... smaller part of the building block 13:42:48 ... about semantic alignment of WoT and Spatial world 13:43:52 ... wondering if Rob can give description on his work about GeoPse 13:44:07 mm: we need a structure 13:44:15 ... how to address the problem 13:44:28 ... (shows an example TD) 13:44:45 ... responding with position property 13:45:01 ... longitude, latitude, accuracy and accuracyUnit 13:45:20 s/longi/including longi/ 13:45:28 ... making things modular 13:45:38 ... and pieces to be combined 13:45:57 jt: something Rob Atkinson is also working on 13:46:19 mm: @context has geolocation vocabulary 13:46:49 roba: we might want to use the context of DCAT 13:47:08 ... scalability issues there? 13:47:49 mm: you could have other sub namespaces for geolocation ontology 13:48:50 roba: schema.org, etc. changes everyday 13:48:58 s/etc./etc., 13:49:31 mm: we'd like to find some ontology to be imported 13:49:55 q? 13:50:00 q- 13:50:16 ... that's the theory of @context within TD 13:50:28 ... there is also privacy issues 13:50:39 ... when geolocation is exposed 13:50:59 roba: would imagine semantic annotation to be added 13:51:37 mm: downstream implementation should assume fixed items 13:51:57 ... still need to spend time to see the OGC specs 13:52:06 ... also WoT to capture their use cases 13:52:22 ... and see requirements for geospatial data 13:52:34 ... we (WoT WG) have to write an updated Charter 13:52:48 ... actually, we have both WoT-WG and WoT-IG 13:53:05 ... our WG recharter may request a 6mo extension 13:53:22 q+ 13:53:58 jt: what's the right way then? 13:54:11 ... normative recommendation on this topic? 13:54:19 ... what's the risk and impact? 13:55:11 ... identifying one or two key SDW communities would make sense? 13:55:47 ... any thoughts from SDW? 13:56:04 linda: OGC experimentation would be useful 13:56:22 ... collaboration on some specific topic 13:56:32 ... joint session between WoT and OGC 13:57:00 mm: due to COVID situation, our F2F schedule has been changed 13:57:09 ... purpose of project is clarifying the issues 13:57:24 ... use the concrete example for further discussion 13:57:42 ... map for territory, etc. 13:57:48 q? 13:58:15 jt: an opportunity to leverage WoT machinery using Plugfest and OGC? 13:58:33 mm: make sense for IoT geolocation 13:59:01 ... what would be the next meeting? 13:59:32 ... maybe early next year? 13:59:40 ... e.g., February 13:59:45 ... for the sprint dash 13:59:53 ... let me reach out by email 14:00:31 q? 14:01:28 kaz: for the next step, I'd suggest we define one specific core use case 14:01:54 ... smart city is OK, but some concrete core use case would be useful 14:02:09 ... and think about our identifies issues based on that use case 14:02:27 ... also we should learn our generated specs with each other 14:03:02 mm: would capture the points on the GitHub issue as well 14:03:18 jt: can share my notes as well 14:03:46 ... let me ask if anybody in the OGC space have any other points 14:03:49 ack k 14:03:54 (none) 14:04:04 jt: linda, what about you? 14:04:07 linda: nothing 14:04:39 mm: who is the right person as the contact point? 14:04:52 jt: Scott with Linda and myself 14:04:56 mm: ok 14:05:54 ... thanks a lot for joining this call! 14:06:12 q? 14:06:22 i|can share|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot/issues/981 Joint call with SDW #981| 14:06:28 (SDW guys leave) 14:07:33 OGC GeoPose seems relevant to location with orientation issues for WoT: https://www.ogc.org/projects/groups/geoposeswg 14:07:44 topic: Netzo 14:07:55 Fady has joined #wot 14:08:16 Ege: Introducing Netzo 14:08:27 i/Ege/scribenick: Fady/ 14:09:06 Arturo Romero: Introducing Netzo 14:09:35 s/Arturo Romero:/Arturo_Romero:/ 14:09:46 ... We are three brothers 14:10:06 ... from mexico 14:10:15 ... We moved to Munich 14:10:41 sebastian_ has joined #wot 14:10:43 ... studied in Germany 14:11:34 ... The problem of IoT today is that it is fragmanted with not interoperability. 14:12:02 ... current solution are siloed, lacking unified interface 14:12:35 ... or are very expensive 14:12:48 ... How does Netzo solve this? 14:13:19 It does this by unfiying IoT of software level 14:14:10 ... We now introduce the Netzo Platform 14:14:50 ... It is an application enablement platform 14:15:53 ... Getting started with Netzo is easy 14:16:26 ... It allows adding things 14:16:46 ... or simulating them just by having their TD 14:17:23 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:17:23 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/10/14-wot-minutes.html kaz 14:17:49 Chair: McCool/Sebastian 14:17:50 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:17:50 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/10/14-wot-minutes.html kaz 14:17:57 ... A TD can be added either by writing it from scratch, by creating them from TMs, importing them or discovering them 14:18:57 ... Netzo creates multi-Thing Dashboard, allow sharing and more 14:19:16 ... How does Netzo look like? 14:19:36 We offer an IDE 14:20:08 ... drag and drop widgets for value visulaization 14:20:38 ... viewing the WoT API etc. 14:21:01 ... Our roadmap: 14:21:09 ... enroll early adopters 14:21:18 ... aquire beta testers 14:21:31 ... create a community 14:21:42 ... then promote 14:22:27 ... we will begin with a private beta in November 14:22:51 ... we ask you to apply with the link we will provide 14:23:27 ... early adopters are forerunners and gain a say in Netzo 14:23:56 ... and therefore get an advantage 14:24:04 q 14:24:13 ... We reached the end of the presentation 14:24:30 q+ 14:24:37 q? 14:24:50 sebastian has joined #wot 14:24:53 q? 14:24:59 gabriel has joined #wot 14:24:59 ... For applying to beta test please visit https://netzo.io/private-beta-signup 14:25:27 q? 14:25:28 q? 14:25:37 Ege: Thank you for presentation Arturo 14:25:42 q+ 14:26:20 ack k 14:26:46 Kaz: Thank you for presentation. Do you have trouble with v1 standard? 14:26:55 q+ 14:27:24 q+ 14:27:45 Miguel: To understand your question correctly, are we having trouble with the context? 14:27:59 s/v1 standard/WoT standards, either v1 standard or v1.1 draft/ 14:28:36 Kaz: I mean did you have any problem understanding v1 standard? 14:29:00 q? 14:29:03 ack mc 14:29:30 Miguel: We do not have problems with understanding the standard 14:29:56 Mccool: Do you implement the WoT Discovery spec? 14:30:22 Miguel: We still did not implement it. 14:30:46 s/1 standard/1 standard when you implemented your implementation/ 14:31:06 Mccool: What was your open source strategy? 14:31:13 q? 14:31:17 q+ 14:32:03 q+ 14:32:24 Miguel: The marketplace now has 3 types of plugins, and more can be added and can be monetized 14:33:47 McCool: There are no orchestration plugins. Do you intend to implement orchestration plugin? 14:34:12 q? 14:34:36 Miguel: We intend to implement something like this, we call it scripting 14:35:37 Christiano: I was wondering, how much of this is ready to be tried in the beta? 14:36:20 q+ 14:36:27 ack c 14:36:32 Miguel: All the things that you saw in the screenshots are already implemented. You can expect everything to we presented in beta state by the middle of November 14:37:48 Daniel: Is the basis for some of the things in Netzo in node-wot? Are you contributing to node-wot? 14:38:01 ack d 14:38:04 ack dape 14:38:14 Miguel: We use it internally, yes and fully embrace it 14:38:36 Ege: What kind of limitations do you see in node-wot? 14:39:09 Miguel: We see node-wot lagging a bit behind in features 14:40:02 Kaz: Your system is like an emergant platform. What types of devices be used with it? 14:40:20 s/emergant/emulation/ 14:40:42 q+ 14:40:46 q? 14:40:46 ack k 14:41:03 ack takio 14:41:12 Miguel: Any device that can use the protocols in node-wot can be emulated 14:41:47 kaz: in that case, would suggest you join the Plugfest next time :) 14:41:54 Miguel: happy to :) 14:42:05 takio: why did you choose WoT as your platform 14:42:09 s/form/form?/ 14:42:43 i/in that/scribenick: kaz/ 14:42:44 q? 14:43:07 Takio: We tried many things, but we heard about WoT we knew it was going to solve the problem we want to solve 14:43:45 Ege: Is it possible to do a live demo? 14:43:58 s/Takio:/Miguel:/ 14:44:09 Miguel: We are not prepared to do it now. 14:44:39 Ege: For me it is fine, but I thought it would be nice to show the others 14:44:53 McCool: We can schedule a live demo 14:45:10 Miguel: We would love to do that 14:45:21 q? 14:45:28 ack e 14:45:29 ack e 14:45:39 McCool: We can schedule a meeting, let's discuss this offline 14:45:47 q+ 14:46:11 Sebastian: Thank you for presentation and it's nice to see what we WoT can be 14:46:35 ... Please join our plugfest so we can test your system 14:46:43 s/we WoT/WoT/ 14:47:13 Arturo: We are reaching our release date, that's why we want to hear your feedback 14:47:24 ... and start a joined collaboration 14:47:58 McCool: What is your first feature you want to finish? 14:48:36 s/joined/joint/ 14:48:39 ... Arturo: Bring data to the platform, to see them in the platform 14:48:52 McCool: you mean live data? 14:49:33 s/... Ar/Ar/ 14:49:33 Miguel: Yes. And fill a dashboad with widgets with live data 14:49:37 q? 14:49:37 q? 14:49:40 ack s 14:49:43 ack m 14:49:57 McCool: The queue is empty 14:50:12 ... you have a contact already, Ege 14:50:22 ... you should continue working 14:50:32 ... and tell us about any issues you encounter 14:50:39 ... so that we can address it 14:51:01 q? 14:51:10 ... anyone else has further comments? 14:51:22 ... I see no one else in the queue 14:51:40 ... next week there are two breakouts 14:52:03 The edge-computing breakout is new and is on Friday 14:52:38 s/The/... The/ 14:52:39 ... I am trying to figure out my schedule for next week 14:53:03 i/edge/... Smart Cities organized by Kaz/ 14:53:05 ... we are going to cancel architecture and profiles 14:53:25 we should track down the breakouts next week 14:53:47 ... Kaz, do you have an update regarding breakout? 14:53:58 Kaz: let me see 14:54:08 breakout session on Oct 18 at 15UTC and Oct 21 14UTC. 14:54:42 s/breakout/Smart Cities breakout/ 14:54:45 McCool: Are there any other breakouts? 14:55:43 ... Kaz, do you know when the voice interactions one is? 14:55:50 ... I will look it out 14:57:35 Kaz: Is it ok to put the link in wiki even when it is protected by password? 14:58:28 McCool: It should be working 14:59:18 McCool: Next week will have to wing it. Are there any organization matters for next week? 14:59:58 i|Next|kaz: my point is so far the W3C Event Team has not put the actual CVent link on the public pages, so maybe we should also avoid putting that on our public wiki| 15:00:08 McCool: Let's assume the editor's call we happen as planned (6 am eastern) 15:01:54 s/we/will/ 15:02:18 kaz: will distribute a doodle poll to find a better slot soon. 15:02:20 [adjourned] 15:02:26 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:02:26 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/10/14-wot-minutes.html kaz 16:49:06 dsr has joined #wot 16:59:51 Zakim has left #wot 17:06:10 zkis has joined #wot 17:07:40 dsr has joined #wot 17:25:11 dsr has joined #wot 17:25:48 dsr has joined #wot 17:50:12 dsr has joined #wot 18:09:20 dsr has joined #wot 18:52:29 dsr has joined #wot 19:25:16 dsr has joined #wot 19:44:16 zkis has joined #wot 19:54:53 dsr has joined #wot 20:27:10 dsr has joined #wot 20:46:14 dsr has joined #wot 21:03:07 dsr has joined #wot 22:02:57 dsr has joined #wot 22:09:07 zkis has joined #wot 23:03:58 dsr has joined #wot