16:40:49 RRSAgent has joined #aria 16:40:49 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/10/14-aria-irc 16:40:51 RRSAgent, make logs Public 16:40:53 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), jamesn 16:40:53 meeting: ARIA WG 16:40:59 chair: JamesNurthen 16:42:01 regrets: PeterKrautzberger StefanSchnabel MarkMcCarthy JaunitaGeorge 16:43:18 agenda+ [New Issue Triage](https://bit.ly/3iTXLO7) 16:43:18 agenda+ [New PR Triage](https://bit.ly/3lCogcz) 16:43:18 agenda+ [TPAC 2021](https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/1482) 16:43:18 - Please register https://www.w3.org/2021/10/TPAC/#participation 16:43:18 - ARIA sessions Scheduled Thursday Oct 28 - (1 hour) 7am Pacific / 10am Eastern & (2 hours) 9am Pacific / noon Eastern 16:43:19 agenda+ Charter License Changes. Preparing CFC for change to Software and Document license. 16:43:19 agenda+ [Updating ARIA 1.2 due to IDL implementations (exit and re-enter CR?)](https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/1598) 16:43:19 agenda+ [clarify img naming steps](https://github.com/w3c/html-aam/pull/322) 16:43:19 agenda+ [Spec is unclear on aria-invalid="spelling" | "grammar" uses](https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/989) 16:43:20 agenda+ [Add figcaption to computation?](https://github.com/w3c/html-aam/issues/325) 17:00:29 WilliamTennisNFCU has joined #aria 17:00:35 present+ 17:01:53 harris has joined #aria 17:03:07 https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/1d223877-730c-446f-bfa9-2e9222902112/20211014T130000 17:04:31 siri has joined #aria 17:04:55 IrfanA has joined #aria 17:05:01 present+ 17:05:36 Jemma has joined #aria 17:05:44 present+ Joanmarie_Diggs 17:05:59 present+ 17:06:07 present+ 17:06:16 present+ 17:06:46 cyns has joined #aria 17:06:55 scribe: WilliamTennisNFCU 17:07:08 zakim, next item 17:07:08 agendum 1 -- [New Issue Triage](https://bit.ly/3iTXLO7) -- taken up [from jamesn] 17:07:44 jamesn: agrees 17:08:10 James Craig: could happen in 1.2 17:11:27 Jamesn: Change defines but more work needs to be done on the indicates as its more nuanced 17:12:12 zakim, next item 17:12:12 agendum 2 -- [New PR Triage](https://bit.ly/3lCogcz) -- taken up [from jamesn] 17:12:44 jamesn: no new PRs asks for anyone to bring forward 17:12:58 jamesn: moving on 17:13:09 zakim, close this item 17:13:09 agendum 2 closed 17:13:10 I see 6 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:13:10 3. [TPAC 2021](https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/1482) [from jamesn] 17:13:17 zakim, next item 17:13:17 agendum 3 -- [TPAC 2021](https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/1482) -- taken up [from jamesn] 17:13:33 s/could happen in 1.2/this change could happen in 1.2, but the related issue (changing "Indicates" to "Enumerates") would be dependent upon our decision in the related IDL discussion./ 17:13:35 - Please register https://www.w3.org/2021/10/TPAC/#participation 17:13:51 - ARIA sessions Scheduled Thursday Oct 28 - (1 hour) 7am Pacific / 10am Eastern & (2 hours) 9am Pacific / noon Eastern 17:14:51 s/Change defines but more work needs to be done on the indicates as its more nuanced/Based on jamesn's suggestion, I'll make the one-word edit, and raise the related definition change as a new issue (comments made in ARIA #1625)/ 17:16:55 q+ 17:17:18 q+ To ask if these will be added to the ARIA WG meeting calendar 17:17:26 q- 17:19:54 https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/1482 17:20:10 cyns: proposing ideas for TPAC discussions on issue 1482 17:21:03 jamesn: we could run some more meetings if these are not proposed as topics 17:21:22 jamesn: i will not be available to run them but someone else could 17:22:06 cyns: will propose a time/date for these meetings 17:22:33 cyns: Canvas seems stable at the moment 17:23:55 q- 17:25:16 AT https://github.com/w3c/pronunciation/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3AAT 17:25:19 Browsers https://github.com/w3c/pronunciation/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3ABrowsers 17:25:29 janina sajka: has a proposed discussion on how content is pronounced and old technology that is bringing challenges 17:25:46 jamesn: propose a time/date 17:26:24 jamesn: please be concious of timezones with scheduling 17:26:50 aaronlev has joined #aria 17:27:02 jamesn: AT vendors would need to be invlved for various countries and continents 17:27:59 jamesn: propose the schedule in a github issue so that various companies can have their input on the date/time 17:29:22 ali irfan: need people from browsers and AT vendors 17:30:29 s/ali irfan/ IrfanA 17:31:01 James Craig: while we have the AT people there is there room for a cross group meeting 17:31:27 IrfanA: need specific people from the aria group 17:32:01 janina sajka: will send specific invites to individuals 17:32:43 janina sajka: difficulty registering to TPAC 17:32:46 james 17:33:02 jamesn: difficulties may be intermittent 17:33:10 zakim, next item 17:33:10 agendum 4 -- Charter License Changes. Preparing CFC for change to Software and Document license. -- taken up [from jamesn] 17:34:09 jamesn: In the issue with our charter there are 3 votes of support for changing to new license 17:34:22 jamesn: objections? 17:35:38 jamesn: no objections 17:36:21 jamesn: this will goto charter review and objections may be heard there 17:36:32 zakim, next item 17:36:32 agendum 5 -- [Updating ARIA 1.2 due to IDL implementations (exit and re-enter CR?)](https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/1598) -- taken up [from jamesn] 17:36:56 jamesn: there have been a few updates to this 17:37:16 james craig: i had not seen the comments 17:37:56 Matt_King has joined #aria 17:38:04 present+ 17:38:05 jcraig: there may be an implementation issue here 17:38:46 From #1598 Option 1 "Spec could state that the nullable enumerated attributes reflect (HTML definition), and the other nullable attributes, ~"Return the value of the attribute if present, or null otherwise." Downside to this path is that none of the implementations match the enumerated attributes IDL now, so those would need to be removed from the PR, or ARIA 1.2 CR would need to wait on two implementations for the enumerated validations. 17:38:46 Note: validation for default missing value and default invalid value is currently handled by the backing accessibility implementation in the engines, and not by the IDL implementation." 17:38:47 jcraig: option1: would seem to be the best solution. JC will describe 17:39:09 jamesn: option1 still has the same issue though? 17:39:36 jcraig: same issue but less overall issues 17:40:14 jamesn: it might not be fewer issues than with option2 17:40:35 jcraig: enumerated ones would be easier, just remove the question mark 17:40:54 jcraig: for non enumerated we don't have a logic way of specing that 17:42:50 jcraig and cyns get into technical discussion around empty vs nullable values 17:43:47 jamesn: there are nuances with empty and nullable in aria 1.3 for aria-desrcribed-by 17:44:26 jamesn: in option 1 & 2 there will be issues with that and the algorith to work around it would need to be defined 17:44:41 ^ jcraig 17:44:54 jamesn: we have an algorith already 17:45:40 jcraig: there is still a logic hole but it may have been addressed, looking it up 17:46:42 https://w3c.github.io/aria/#idl_attr_disambiguation 17:46:44 cyns: good idea or bad idea? what if we gave a default value of null? 17:47:54 jcraig: sections define linking patterns and gives it a format and there are exceptions to that format but we could possibly modify some sections to fit the scheme better 17:48:36 jamesn: this section is normative 17:48:55 jcraig: i will respond to the comments 17:49:49 agenda? 17:49:53 jamesn: anything else to add? 17:51:07 jamesn: put a link to the meeting in the issue to elicit a response as no direct contacts exist to those that need to attend 17:51:45 zakim, next item 17:51:45 agendum 6 -- [clarify img naming steps](https://github.com/w3c/html-aam/pull/322) -- taken up [from jamesn] 17:52:51 scott ohara: drops title attribute if alt name is empty 17:53:52 scott ohara: firefox does not want to drop the title 17:54:28 scott ohara: chromium and firefox are conflicting on this 17:55:15 matt king: is there any data we could use to help with this? 17:55:52 matt king: this has been communicated for years that this is what empty alt text means 17:56:20 matt king: trying to think of a real world case of needing a title on a decorative image 17:56:27 jamesn: not needed 17:57:04 matt king: let's get a consensus on this issue 17:57:06 q+ to ask for review assignment and to mention the priorities of constituents 17:58:49 scott ohara and aaron leventhal discuss the nuances between chromium and firefox's level of exposure of the title and description of the image 17:59:22 matt king: we should align the experiences across the browsers if possible 18:00:22 discussion around author error and what to tell the developer in these cases 18:02:06 jcraig: need to reference the priorities of the constituents because the author may be confused but we need to prioritize users over authors 18:02:24 matt king: users get flooded with titles that get in the way 18:03:15 jamesn: the spec says to expose title as description in some cases but there is a discrepancy between browsers 18:03:26 jamesn: calls time 18:03:45 rrsagent, make minutes 18:03:45 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/10/14-aria-minutes.html WilliamTennisNFCU 18:03:46 talking among googlers here, we'd be ok with either the firefox or chrome approach 18:03:56 as long as there is consensus 18:04:53 rrsagent, make minutes 18:04:53 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/10/14-aria-minutes.html WilliamTennisNFCU 18:05:22 zakim, please part 18:05:22 leaving. As of this point the attendees have been WilliamTennisNFCU, IrfanA, Joanmarie_Diggs, harris, Jemma, jamesn, Matt_King 18:05:22 Zakim has left #aria 19:03:16 jongund has joined #aria