Meeting minutes
Minutes review
Sep-1
… no objections -> minutes approved
Quick updates
McCool: DIoT Workshop
… travelling might be problematic
… issue on WoT page 28 oct Sept 2 should become Sep 27-Oct 1
McCool: Joint session with WoT Japanese CG?
Kaz: Not planned but the item has been added to the vF2F wiki's "not scheduled" section :)
TPAC 2021 planning
McCool: need to confirm the dates
… grab extra day(s) for open day(s)
… interesting for new companies
… Need to decide on times also
… need to fill in topics
… wiki (with dates et cetera) will be updated by Friday
… wiki
… please let me know if you encounter issues with the tables and dates
… Oct 5 and 7 we have vF2F
… suggest to have open day in week October 11 to October 15
… in week October 25 to October 29: vF2F and Joint Meetings
… we also have breakout table for the week from October 26 to October 30
McCool: I updated F2F planning section
… suggest to create issue (and labels) for issues
… we use https://
Lagally: Beneficial to follow-up with automotive?
McCool: Agree, let's add Automotive to groups to meet
… any other group?
Kaz: Automotive working on APIs and Ontologies, so would make sense to have joint discussion
Kaz: joint discussion about streaming data makes sense
… talk about possible use-cases with MEIG
… and Web Transport
Lagally: I can reach out to Automotive (I have 1 contact)
McCool: DID and VC same group?
Kaz: different groups
McCool: To all: reach out to groups
… having said that, we might need more time
… otherwise we would need other slots
… can figure out problem later
Lagally: On groups meetings. Does it make sense to have tentative goal?
… idea of an agenda? possible outcome
McCool: Suggest to create issue with proposed agenda
Kaz: Can re-use template from last year
McCool: Exactly
… Template
… we might also link the issue from wiki
Kaz: w.r.t. JSON-LD
… JSON-LD is in maintenance mode
… maybe talk with DID and JSON-LD experts at the same time
McCool: I see
Kaz: I can talk to MiniApp group
McCool: OK
Kaz: Suggest to add "WoT Japanese CG" also
Kaz: wonder whether we can make extra *free* week (October 11 to October 15) as open week or not
McCool: Yes, meetings with external groups
McCool: We might need to setup a Doodle
… or use the same slots again as in the other weeks
McCool: need to choose 2 x 3-hour sessions (6 hours in total)
Kaz: will create Doodle
McCool: Need to have resolution for the dates
<McCool> proposal: adopt the proposed schedule as follows: Plugfest Sept 27-Oct 1; vF2F Oct 5, 7, 27, 28, 29; and Joint meetings Oct 25-29
<McCool> proposal: adopt the following schedule: Plugfest Sept 27-Oct 1; vF2F Oct 5, 7, 27, 28, 29; and Joint meetings Oct 25-29
Resolution: Adopt the following schedule - Plugfest Sept 27-Oct 1; vF2F Oct 5, 7, 26, 27, 28; and Joint meetings Oct 25-29
McCool: will update https://
Charters
Kaz: final draft online, see https://
… no objections from the horizontal groups, so we'd move ahead.
… WG
McCool: let's continue the discussion on the WG Charter.
Smart Cities
Kaz: no updates
… I'll update the draft Smart Cities IG Charter, and also will organize breakout session
Testing
McCool: Ege is still not back but I plan to have testing call
McCool: we may discuss PlugFest topics
… rather short meeting
… repo exists, see https://
… need to get organized
… what about VPN?
Kaz: We should clarify logistics in Testing call
… VPN should be still available on AWS server
Liaisons
McCool: Any updates?
Kaz: need to respond to ITU-T
McCool: Who can do that?
Kaz: I am happy to respond
… including their request on a joint webinar with ITU-T
McCool: Okay, let's organize a joint meeting with them for that
McCool: w.r.t. OGC
… we will likely have a joint session with OGC and IEEE P2874 and ECHONET
… maybe also joint sessions with
… ECLASS
… OPC UA
… ISO TC184/SC4
McCool: Let's use the label "external" for these joint meetings
AOB
<McCool> https://
McCool: The Netzo WoT Platform brings IoT technologies together and empowers anyone to build cutting-edge solutions from a single place. Built with flexibility in mind, Netzo makes it easy for users and businesses to jump-start and future-proof their digital transformation.
TF Reports
Security
McCool: Where do signatures belong to?
… discussed that
McCool: probably will be handled by IETF
… let's spin off the Signature work at WoT as a separate Note
… and make it non-normative
… and then let's see what would happen on the IETF side
… we could refer to their generated standard at some point possibly
… would have a dedicated repo for that purpose
… aob for today?
(none)
[adjourned]
(5min break and then Plugfest call)