15:56:32 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #wpwg-spc
15:56:32 <RRSAgent> logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/06/28-wpwg-spc-irc
15:56:46 <Ian> Meeting: SPC Task Force
15:56:49 <Ian> Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-payments-wg/2021Jun/0018.html
15:56:52 <Ian> Chair: Ian
15:56:55 <Ian> Scribe: Ian
15:57:08 <Ian> agenda+ Analysis of SPC use case prioritization survey
15:57:14 <Ian> agenda+ Any follow-up from 24 June WPWG discussion of SPC
15:57:19 <Ian> agenda+ Time for open issues
15:57:23 <Ian> agenda+ Next call
15:58:16 <Ian> present+
15:58:47 <Ian> regrets+ Michel_Weksler
15:59:53 <Ian> present+ Anne_Pouillard
16:00:26 <Ian> present+ Chris_Wood
16:00:30 <Ian> present+ Werner_Bruinings
16:00:39 <Ian> present+ Stephen_McGruer
16:00:46 <Chris_Wood> Chris_Wood has joined #wpwg-spc
16:00:46 <Ian> present+ Jean-Carlo_Emer
16:00:52 <Ian> present+ Christian_Aabye
16:01:32 <Ian> present+ Jonathan_Grossar
16:01:42 <Ian> zakim, take up item 1
16:01:42 <Zakim> agendum 1 -- Analysis of SPC use case prioritization survey -- taken up [from Ian]
16:02:05 <Ian> present+ Doug_Fisher
16:02:13 <Ian> present+ Susan_Pandy
16:02:23 <werner> werner has joined #wpwg-spc
16:02:30 <Ian> present+ Adrian_Hope-Bailie
16:02:45 <Ian> present+ Gerhard_Oosthuizen
16:02:58 <jcemer> jcemer has joined #wpwg-spc
16:03:17 <Ian> -> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/83744/spc-priority/results SPC use cases prioritization
16:03:20 <Christian> Christian has joined #wpwg-spc
16:03:39 <Gerhard> Gerhard has joined #wpwg-spc
16:04:02 <Ian> present+ Clinton_Allen
16:04:10 <Ian> ====
16:04:10 <Ian> 4.78 / 9: Auth different merchant
16:04:10 <Ian> 2.11 / 6: In-transaction enrollment, later authentication same merchant
16:04:10 <Ian> 2.00 / 6: Enrollment of multiple instruments with one authentication
16:04:11 <Ian> 1.78 / 5: Enrollment for both payment authentication and account login
16:04:12 <Ian> 1.56 / 4: Authentication with out-of-band authenticator
16:04:13 <Ian> 0.78 / 3: Express Checkout (no user presence check)
16:04:15 <Ian> 0.78 / 2: Frictionless Checkout (no user presence check or payment confirmation dialog)
16:04:17 <Ian> 0.56 / 3: Web Authentication enrollment
16:04:19 <Ian> 0.56 / 4: Authenticator unenrollment
16:04:21 <Ian> 0.33 / 1: Authentication by bank after redirect
16:04:34 <clinton> clinton has joined #wpwg-spc
16:05:48 <Anne> Anne has joined #wpwg-spc
16:08:07 <Doug_> Doug_ has joined #wpwg-spc
16:08:45 <Ian> PROPOSAL: Remove out-of-band auth from the list of use cases under consideration
16:08:53 <praveena> praveena has joined #wpwg-spc
16:09:18 <Ian> present+ Praveena_Subrahamany
16:11:01 <Ian> -> https://github.com/w3c/secure-payment-confirmation/blob/gh-pages/scope.md Use cases
16:11:05 <Ian> present+ Sameer_Tare
16:11:57 <SameerT> SameerT has joined #wpwg-spc
16:15:06 <clinton> q+
16:15:09 <Ian> ack clinton
16:15:16 <Ian> clinton: I think the results make sense
16:15:28 <Ian> ...regarding new use cases, I can see two paths
16:15:42 <Ian> ...some use cases lead to general solutions
16:15:47 <Ian> ...glad to see SRC in there
16:16:37 <Ian> Ian: Any difference between 3DS and SRC flows?
16:16:50 <Ian> Jonathan: The RP is different
16:18:03 <Ian> Ian: What about CIBA in open banking use case?
16:18:42 <Ian> chris: Client-initiated backchannel authentication. ... with CIBA it's a relatively straightforward and common approach in common banking....could definitely be used to exchange credential ids.
16:18:56 <Ian> ...doesn't look much different from the other use cases we've been looking at
16:19:49 <Ian> q+
16:20:00 <Ian> ack me
16:21:00 <Ian> Ian: Could we review the enrollment in a cross-origin iframe?
16:21:22 <Ian> Stephen: The origin trial allows a bank iframe (3p wrt top-level merchant) with UX
16:22:37 <Ian> ...whether the browser UX is required remains to be seen.
16:27:32 <Ian> Topic: Other feeback
16:28:01 <Ian> Ian: We also heard a desire for the caller to call SPC without a round-trip to the RP. And to allow the merchant to validate the assertion
16:29:31 <Ian> zakim, close item 1
16:29:31 <Zakim> agendum 1, Analysis of SPC use case prioritization survey, closed
16:29:32 <Zakim> I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
16:29:32 <Zakim> 2. Any follow-up from 24 June WPWG discussion of SPC [from Ian]
16:30:02 <Ian> zakim, take up item 2
16:30:02 <Zakim> agendum 2 -- Any follow-up from 24 June WPWG discussion of SPC -- taken up [from Ian]
16:31:11 <Ian> zakim, close item 2
16:31:11 <Zakim> agendum 2, Any follow-up from 24 June WPWG discussion of SPC, closed
16:31:12 <Zakim> I see 2 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
16:31:12 <Zakim> 3. Time for open issues [from Ian]
16:31:16 <Ian> zakim, close item 3
16:31:16 <Zakim> agendum 3, Time for open issues, closed
16:31:17 <Zakim> I see 1 item remaining on the agenda:
16:31:17 <Zakim> 4. Next call [from Ian]
16:31:29 <Ian> zakim, take up item
16:31:29 <Zakim> I don't understand 'take up item', Ian
16:31:30 <Ian> zakim, take up item 4
16:31:30 <Zakim> agendum 4 -- Next call -- taken up [from Ian]
16:31:52 <Ian> 5 July
16:32:02 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/06/28-wpwg-spc-minutes.html Ian
16:32:30 <Ian> rrsagent, set logs public
17:04:55 <Ian> zakimm, bye
17:04:56 <Ian> zakim, bye
17:04:56 <Zakim> leaving.  As of this point the attendees have been Ian, Anne_Pouillard, Chris_Wood, Werner_Bruinings, Stephen_McGruer, Jean-Carlo_Emer, Christian_Aabye, Jonathan_Grossar,
17:04:56 <Zakim> Zakim has left #wpwg-spc
17:04:58 <Ian> rrsagent, bye
17:04:58 <RRSAgent> I see no action items