19:52:23 RRSAgent has joined #dxwgdcat 19:52:23 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/05/26-dxwgdcat-irc 19:52:25 RRSAgent, make logs public 19:52:25 Zakim has joined #dxwgdcat 19:52:27 Meeting: Dataset Exchange Working Group Teleconference 19:52:27 Date: 26 May 2021 19:52:40 present+ 19:53:06 RRSAgent, make logs public 19:53:13 RRSAgent, draft minutes 19:53:13 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/05/26-dxwgdcat-minutes.html RiccardoAlbertoni 19:55:40 regrets+ PeterWinstanley 19:57:39 RRSAgent, make logs public 19:57:50 RRSAgent, draft minutes 19:57:50 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/05/26-dxwgdcat-minutes.html RiccardoAlbertoni 19:58:46 agenda: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2021.05.26 19:58:52 RRSAgent, draft minutes 19:58:52 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/05/26-dxwgdcat-minutes.html RiccardoAlbertoni 20:01:53 DaveBrowning has joined #dxwgdcat 20:02:20 AndreaPerego has joined #dxwgdcat 20:06:55 present+ 20:07:07 alejandra has joined #dxwgdcat 20:07:45 7me alejandra we are meeting on meet.google.com/ywn-krwh-pjp 20:08:08 s/7/// 20:09:24 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 20:09:24 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/05/26-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 20:09:40 present+ 20:09:43 Chair: RiccardoAlbertoni 20:10:05 scribe: DaveBrowning 20:10:11 present+ 20:10:23 PROPOSED: approve last meeting minutes https://www.w3.org/2021/04/28-dxwgdcat-minutes 20:10:27 topic: Minutes of last meeting 20:10:29 +1 20:10:35 +1 20:10:37 +0 (absent) 20:10:42 +1 20:10:50 RESOLVED: approve last meeting minutes https://www.w3.org/2021/04/28-dxwgdcat-minutes 20:10:53 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 20:10:53 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/05/26-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 20:11:05 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2021.05.26 20:11:29 topic: approve agenda 20:11:34 +1 20:11:37 +1 20:11:41 +1 20:11:47 resolved: Agenda approved 20:12:26 topic: Accessibility Considerations 20:12:28 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1358 20:12:35 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 20:12:35 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/05/26-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 20:13:08 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1373 20:13:28 RiccardoAlbertoni: request to add specific section, and I have drafted a pull request (early draft) 20:13:46 Link to relevant section: https://raw.githack.com/w3c/dxwg/dcat-issue-1358/dcat/index.html#accessibility 20:14:08 RiccardoAlbertoni: Matches what was asked for (superficially) - but should we go further 20:14:31 ... haven't added any detailed guidance 20:14:48 https://raw.githack.com/w3c/dxwg/dcat-issue-1358/dcat/index.html 20:14:56 RiccardoAlbertoni: Any views or comments 20:15:03 q+ 20:15:14 ack AndreaPerego 20:16:03 AndreaPerego: Somewhat puzzled by the request, have tried to think of alternatives, didn't come up with anything 20:16:26 q+ 20:16:31 q+ 20:16:49 ack AndreaPerego 20:17:05 +q 20:17:15 AndreaPerego: Is this really in scope? Is it more about publishing (so DWBP rather than DCAT) 20:18:11 AndreaPerego: Only thing we have in the requirements is a request to add thumbnail (for geospatial) 20:18:19 q? 20:19:10 ack DaveBrowning 20:19:13 AndreaPerego: Perhaps we could consider how the metadata could be read? 20:22:05 q+ 20:23:08 ack alejandra 20:23:18 DaveBrowning: Concerned that we will need to do something in the examples 20:23:58 RiccardoAlbertoni: They have only really asked for something equivalent to what we did for Security etc 20:24:27 alejandra: we probably need to go back to them for a bit more guidance/clarification 20:25:11 ... have looked for other examples/standards (eg JSON-LD) and can't find anything 20:25:18 q? 20:25:26 ack AndreaPerego 20:25:48 +1 to suggestion that we ask, 20:26:11 AndreaPerego: We can point back to our draft section.... 20:26:38 +q 20:28:06 ack RiccardoAlbertoni 20:28:16 AndreaPerego: We already have descriptions (textual) for some of the URLs(e.g for distributions) in the metadata.... 20:28:37 adding some other of my comments from before - perhaps we could consider a new property on the distributions for the alternative text 20:29:21 ... but as the issue is around a section at the same level of Security and Privacy, perhaps they want us to raise awareness of data accessibility by mentioning it, as Riccardo did in the proposal 20:31:35 action: RiccardoAlbertoni to ask for feedback in https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1358 on accessibility section 20:31:35 Created ACTION-450 - Ask for feedback in https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1358 on accessibility section [on Riccardo Albertoni - due 2021-06-02]. 20:31:46 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 20:31:46 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/05/26-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 20:31:59 Issues #1364 and #1153 related to dcat:theme 20:32:19 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1364 20:32:19 topic: Issues on dcat:theme 20:32:24 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1153 20:32:31 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 20:32:31 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/05/26-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 20:32:57 RiccardoAlbertoni: Some discussion on changing the range of dcat:theme 20:33:07 see example, in the Revhttps://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-skos-reference-20090818/#L896 20:33:50 s/in the Rev/in / 20:34:22 ... some concern that even if allowed by REC that we are putting as object both instance and class 20:34:33 +q 20:34:33 ... not clear on the impact 20:34:53 q? 20:34:55 ... tried with Protege and didn't cause a problem 20:35:02 ack alejandra 20:35:29 q+ 20:36:08 RiccardoAlbertoni: 2 possible solutions - either use owl classes as object or alternatively use union of skos concept and owl class... 20:36:27 ... could be useful to clarify that both could be expected 20:36:55 q? 20:36:55 I think this issue is more or less about the same point: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1362 20:37:54 alejandra: Interesting issue. We do need to clarify. If we allow owl classes then we need to explain that its okay by usage note or other comment 20:39:03 ... discussion on dcterm:subject is also relevent. (History of the evolution of DC is kind of lost) 20:39:22 q? 20:39:25 ... Need to make this clear 20:39:26 ack AndreaPerego 20:40:56 AndreaPerego: Yes, it needs to be clarified. Looking at how its used - theme tends to be thematic 'environment'; 'public sector', essentially the main topic 20:41:27 ... Generally we try to be inclusive and different groups do different things 20:42:04 ... They have their own ways and we risk creating confusions. 20:43:08 ... Could include owl individuals, but as said - people are using DCAT as owl ontology, but although we do use owl DCAT wasn't designed to be used like that 20:43:41 ... A lot of these issues could be resolved via SHACL or profile ... 20:44:37 ... We do have conficting issues raised 20:45:25 ... Different communities pulling in different directions 20:46:02 RiccardoAlbertoni: People are confusing that range: is really guidance not a constraint 20:46:54 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 20:46:54 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/05/26-dxwgdcat-minutes.html DaveBrowning 20:47:46 q+ 20:48:11 RiccardoAlbertoni: To summarise - is the feeling that we should explain more? 20:48:55 AndreaPerego: We risk upsetting one party if we change/say anything, so we need to something more 20:50:14 +q 20:50:19 q- 20:50:30 ack alejandra 20:50:39 q? 20:51:25 alejandra: If we add clarification, but ranges are guidance. Are you suggesting adding to RDF? 20:52:06 +q 20:52:17 ack alejandra 20:52:30 RiccardoAlbertoni: I was suggesting both, but now think we should go for the lightweight touch of note only 20:55:18 https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#ex-conformance-test-results-earl 20:55:18 alejandra: Example 48... 20:56:32 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/blob/836b201802c0859c20bd066816e0c2cebb239f12/dcat/rdf/dcat3.ttl#L1034 20:57:10 so, is this a bug? https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/blob/836b201802c0859c20bd066816e0c2cebb239f12/dcat/rdf/dcat3.ttl#L1034 20:57:42 Issue about dc:subject and dcat:keyword: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/175 20:59:50 RiccardoAlbertoni: So looks like the ttl needs fixing. 21:00:33 ... What should we be adding to the examples to explain? 21:00:58 alejandra: I'll raise an issue for the errata 21:02:16 RiccardoAlbertoni: I'll put together a draft for the clarification and we can review. Key is we don't want to change the range of dcat:themes 21:02:21 ... yet 21:02:32 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:02:32 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/05/26-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:03:01 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1370 21:03:45 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/164 21:05:19 alejandra: Thought we weren't doing the alignments? 21:06:30 AndreaPerego: Part of the idea was to see if people would want to collaborate on alignments, but not in the standard. Do we want an 'official' place? 21:07:00 RiccardoAlbertoni: Might be a good idea. github wiki or W3C? 21:07:42 I will follow up - and I agree to put the link for reference (but won't go into the spec) 21:09:10 AndreaPerego: Main collection point is on the W3 page 21:10:19 AOB: none 21:10:28 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:10:28 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/05/26-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:11:19 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:11:19 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/05/26-dxwgdcat-minutes.html RiccardoAlbertoni