15:52:58 RRSAgent has joined #apa 15:52:58 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/05/12-apa-irc 15:53:00 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:53:00 Zakim has joined #apa 15:53:02 Meeting: Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group Teleconference 15:53:02 Date: 12 May 2021 15:53:08 agenda? 15:54:13 regrets: Amy, Gottfried, David 15:54:50 Chair: Janina 15:54:50 agenda+ Agenda Review & Announcements 15:54:50 agenda+ Charter Updates 15:54:50 agenda+ TPAC Planning 15:54:50 agenda+ Task Force Updates 15:54:53 agenda+ FAST Progress 15:54:55 agenda+ New Charters Review https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22Horizontal+review+requested%22 15:54:58 agenda+ Horizontal Review Issues Tracker https://w3c.github.io/horizontal-issue-tracker/?repo=w3c/a11y-review 15:55:01 agenda+ new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html 15:55:04 agenda+ CSS Update & Comment Feedback (Amy) https://github.com/w3c/css-a11y/issues 15:55:06 agenda+ Dangling Spec Review Cleanup: https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Category:Spec_Review_Assigned 15:55:09 agenda+ Actions Checkin (Specs) https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/open 15:55:12 agenda+ Other Business 15:55:14 agenda+ be done 15:56:49 present+ 15:57:43 regrets+ Becky 16:00:42 JF has joined #apa 16:01:06 @Paul G - see here: https://github.com/w3c/pronunciation/wiki/Socialization 16:01:18 agenda? 16:01:26 Present+ 16:02:02 Lionel_Wolberger has joined #apa 16:02:07 Fredrik has joined #apa 16:02:14 present+ 16:02:18 scribe: Fredrik 16:02:22 present+ 16:02:23 present+ 16:02:24 scribe: Fredrik 16:02:30 becky has joined #apa 16:02:52 Garth has joined #apa 16:02:53 zakim, next item 16:02:53 agendum 1 -- Agenda Review & Announcements -- taken up [from janina] 16:03:36 janina: it's time to start talking TPAC, this will start being a standard agenda item for the coming months. 16:03:59 janina: Any announcements? 16:04:03 zakim, next item 16:04:03 agendum 2 -- Charter Updates -- taken up [from janina] 16:04:46 janina: By process we are required to get votes, passing 5 percent of actual plus-ones, for a charter to pass. 16:05:35 MichaelC: 23 positives, 24 required. Another vote required. 16:06:06 janina: Reminder to those whose organizations are members: please have your AC-REP send in their vote for the APA-WG charter. 16:06:20 JF: Offer= to poke the Deque people in this regard. 16:06:28 janina: Much appreciated. 16:06:52 Fredrik: Will forward this to Klaus. 16:07:13 janina: thers have also offered to ping their AC-REPs. 16:07:36 MichaelC: If your organization hasn't voted, please let them know and encourage them to do so. 16:07:50 zakim, next item 16:07:50 agendum 3 -- TPAC Planning -- taken up [from janina] 16:08:24 janina: We have it for half a year, this planning item. TPAC will be virtual this year again. 16:08:59 ...it will be in October spread over several weeks. The immediate date isn't as important as us thinking who we need to have meetings with during TPAC. 16:09:51 ...Presumably, we'll meet with CSS. Others come and go as need arises. The point is we need to be thinking about that and the TFs to think about what WGs inside the W3C would be profitable to spend time with. Then we'll do outreach and calendarize ourselves together. 16:10:06 ...Not only who but why is interesting: what would we meet with them about? 16:10:27 ...We'd like to startreaching out to other WGs in June to get meetings arranged. 16:10:38 JF: Is there a wiki? 16:10:43 janina: Not yet but soon. 16:10:50 zakim, next item 16:10:50 agendum 4 -- Task Force Updates -- taken up [from janina] 16:11:11 JonnyJames has joined #apa 16:11:26 present+ 16:11:34 janina: CFCs: the FPWD from pronunciation is in FC. Have a look at it before midnight today Boston time. 16:12:00 janina: RQTF CFC for hte RAUR is also underway. 16:12:22 ...specifically with respect to WebRTC, that goes until midnight Friday Boston time. 16:12:44 ...the XAUR is coming up for CFC. 16:13:12 ...barring surprises we may be finished with the RAUR now. Speed is less important than conprehensiveness and accuracy. 16:13:27 janina: Personalization is working towards CR status. Another week or so. 16:13:34 zakim, next item 16:13:34 agendum 5 -- FAST Progress -- taken up [from janina] 16:14:39 MichaelC: The WCAG3 Functional Needs group has gotten approval for a servey. As soon as cleanup is done, the survey will open up (probably next week). 16:14:48 janina: We will definitely want everyone's participation in this. 16:14:56 zakim, next item 16:14:56 agendum 6 -- New Charters Review https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22Horizontal+review+requested%22 -- taken up [from janina] 16:15:41 https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues/268 16:15:52 MichaelC: Before, we looked at the PNG working group. There is a little conversation happening about this. 16:16:05 https://w3c.github.io/charter-drafts/png-2021.html 16:16:28 MichaelC: Their charter doesn't follow the charter template. 16:17:13 MichaelC: Let me cook up a MC response and look at it next week. 16:17:21 janina: Sounds good. 16:18:39 janina: Devices and sensors is held up by other issues in Research Questions. 16:19:00 MichaelC: Let me put a note in it saying we're lookign at it. 16:19:09 janina: That's good for them to know. 16:19:13 MichaelC: The rest is silence. 16:19:16 zakim, next item 16:19:16 agendum 7 -- Horizontal Review Issues Tracker https://w3c.github.io/horizontal-issue-tracker/?repo=w3c/a11y-review -- taken up [from janina] 16:19:59 MichaelC: For ARIA and HTML Cynthia Shelley has filed three issues. 16:20:17 MichaelC: Do we want to track these issues? 16:20:38 janina: Defer to the ARIA working group and note that they are actively reviewing the document. 16:20:44 +1 16:20:49 MichaelC: Mark them as tracking? We'll still be notified of what's going on. 16:21:11 JF: Especially the one for HTML since that involves a somewaht distant working group. 16:21:26 janina: We have reviewed the ARIA in HTML document in the past and similarly deferred to ARIA-WG. 16:22:09 https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/5678 16:22:21 paul_grenier: I had a look at the HTMOL dialog return issue. 16:24:10 MichaelC: The issue was closed around the same time as Paul was assigned to it. I think Paul should put the comments in the issue but leave it in a closed issue. They can thebn decide to open based on Paul's comments if they so choose. 16:25:49 janina: It sounds like we should reopen this.