17:13:49 RRSAgent has joined #aria 17:13:49 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/04/22-aria-irc 17:13:51 RRSAgent, make logs Public 17:13:53 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), jamesn 17:13:59 present+ 17:14:03 meeting: ARIA WG 17:14:04 scribe: carmacleod 17:14:07 present+ 17:14:08 chair: JamesNurthen 17:14:10 present+ 17:14:49 https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/1d223877-730c-446f-bfa9-2e9222902112/20210422T130000 17:14:56 agenda? 17:14:59 Jaunita_George has joined #aria 17:16:06 agenda+ [New Issue Triage](https://bit.ly/32vX311) 17:16:06 agenda+ [New PR Triage](https://bit.ly/2Pd8Qyc) 17:16:06 agenda+ [Meaty topic for next week](https://bit.ly/3v8tUoQ) 17:16:06 agenda+ [Charter](https://raw.githack.com/w3c/aria/charter-2021/charter.html) 17:16:06 agenda+ [onboarding?](https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/1401) 17:16:07 agenda+ [Add role=image as synonym for role=img](https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/1370) 17:16:07 agenda+ Proposal - Back out new naming mechanisms from 1.3 17:16:07 agenda+ [1.3 triage](https://bit.ly/3gr6ffh) 17:16:15 zakim, next item 17:16:15 agendum 1 -- [New Issue Triage](https://bit.ly/32vX311) -- taken up [from jamesn] 17:18:19 Will has joined #aria 17:18:59 https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/1466 17:19:41 scott: 1.3, and I'll take it 17:19:51 https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/1463 17:20:05 https://github.com/w3c/aria/discussions/1469?converting=1 17:20:37 aaron: is the rule about whether you can use aria-roledescription on the explicit role or the computed role? 17:21:03 https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/1462 17:21:15 jamesn: editorial, 1.3, assigning myself 17:21:33 zakim, next item 17:21:33 agendum 2 -- [New PR Triage](https://bit.ly/2Pd8Qyc) -- taken up [from jamesn] 17:22:03 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/1468 17:22:12 jamesn: I will review that 17:22:22 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/1467 17:23:12 scott: want ua to not expose descendant links to be set to disabled state. Need help making it clear in the spec: don't do that 17:23:34 jamesn: need 3 reviewers 17:24:01 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/1465 17:24:12 jamesn: will review and merge 17:24:30 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/1464 17:24:45 jamesn: any volunteer reviewers 17:24:56 jcraig: I'll review 17:25:04 MarkMccarthy: add me 17:25:26 siri: I can review 17:25:49 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/1460 17:26:38 jamesn: carolyn is down as a reviewer, need one more 17:26:44 jcraig: add me 17:26:53 Matt_King has joined #aria 17:26:54 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/1457 17:27:01 present+ 17:27:13 jamesn: I'll review. anyone else? 17:27:24 Jemma: I can review 17:28:23 juanita: I can partner with someone to review 17:28:59 jasonjgw has left #aria 17:29:04 jcraig: I can partner 17:30:02 zakim, next item 17:30:02 agendum 3 -- [Meaty topic for next week](https://bit.ly/3v8tUoQ) -- taken up [from jamesn] 17:30:44 rrsagent, make minutes 17:30:44 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/04/22-aria-minutes.html jamesn 17:31:05 agenda? 17:32:02 jamesn: roledescription on May 6 17:32:29 jamesn: may have to move dataviz part 2 to either next week or 3 weeks time 17:32:50 zakim, next item 17:32:50 agendum 4 -- [Charter](https://raw.githack.com/w3c/aria/charter-2021/charter.html) -- taken up [from jamesn] 17:33:01 https://www.w3.org/2021/04/22-aria-dive-minutes.html 17:34:19 jamesn: draft of charter. proposing moving everything except aria to living standard, so AAMs, etc 17:35:00 jamesn: this is what the browsers are doing anyhow 17:35:09 mck: including accname 17:35:37 jamesn: that's my proposal. please look at the draft and discuss 17:36:44 jamesn: the only question is do we do the same thing for aria itself 17:38:09 jamesn: there would still be an editor's draft, and you move something into the main branch when it has tests and implementations 17:38:52 mck: I thought the main branch was the editor's draft and there's a stable branch 17:39:20 jamesn: yes, actually, that's what i meant 17:41:10 jamesn: let's start a discussion thread around the charter and whether or not we should go with living standard for the aria spec 17:42:14 aaron: I think it comes down to what different stakeholders get out of the aria spec 17:42:43 jamesn: there are some organizations that won't use an editor's draft 17:43:24 jamesn: although thy use the HTML spec, and it's a living standard 17:44:10 scott: actually, whatwg is putting out snapshots now to address that problem 17:46:50 aaron: would be nice to know that something is the spec is not going to be removed 17:47:25 jamesn: agreed 17:47:33 mck: agreed 17:47:38 zakim, next item 17:47:38 agendum 5 -- [onboarding?](https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/1401) -- taken up [from jamesn] 17:48:29 https://github.com/w3c/aria/wiki/Onboaring 17:49:07 jamesn: jemma has created an onboarding wiki page 17:49:31 https://github.com/w3c/onboarding/pull/19 17:49:39 Jemma: I will add to this after JamesC's onboarding session today 17:50:24 agenda? 17:51:10 mck: wiki pages need some protocol re providing feedback and editing the wiki page 17:51:26 carmacleod_: comment in the issue and then make the change? 17:51:30 zakim, next item 17:51:30 agendum 6 -- [Add role=image as synonym for role=img](https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/1370) -- taken up [from jamesn] 17:52:48 jamesn: need mck to approve 17:52:56 zakim, next item 17:52:56 agendum 7 -- Proposal - Back out new naming mechanisms from 1.3 -- taken up [from jamesn] 17:54:16 jamesn: we had 2 new concepts: name from encapsulation, name from legend 17:55:31 jamesn: received feedback from an implementor that this was going to have massive performance implications 17:55:41 aaron: who was that? 17:55:52 jamesn: it was you, aaron 17:56:13 aaron: I don't remember the discussion - was it in some other context? 17:56:46 jamesn: I believe you didn't want to complicate the name computation, because it's already complicated and fragile 17:58:51 aaron: this is when we were going to do role=label? There are already other ways to do this, so this is not needed 17:59:03 aaron: it's just a "nice to have" 18:00:09 mck: we were doing role parity, and this would provide more parity between html and aria in the way you do things 18:00:32 +1 Matt and Aaron 18:02:01 jamesn: we are at time, will put this on the agenda for next week. need to close on this because we either need to move it forward for aria 1.3 or take it out 18:02:14 l? 18:02:59 s/l?/zakim, who is on the call? 18:03:13 zakim, who is on the call? 18:03:13 Present: Joanmarie_Diggs, jamesn, carmacleod_, MarkMccarthy, Matt_King 18:03:24 present + 18:04:19 zakim, who is on the call? 18:04:19 Present: Joanmarie_Diggs, jamesn, carmacleod_, MarkMccarthy, Matt_King 18:06:22 present+ Siri, William, JCraig, Jemma, Aaron, Scott, Jaunita 18:06:30 zakim, who is on the call? 18:06:30 Present: Joanmarie_Diggs, jamesn, carmacleod_, MarkMccarthy, Matt_King, Siri, William, JCraig, Jemma, Aaron, Scott, Jaunita 18:06:41 rrsagent, make minutes 18:06:41 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/04/22-aria-minutes.html carmacleod_ 18:08:04 regrets+ CurtB, Cynthia, PeterK, MelSumner 18:08:13 rrsagent, make minutes 18:08:13 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/04/22-aria-minutes.html carmacleod_ 18:16:57 present+ Greta 18:17:01 rrsagent, make minutes 18:17:01 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/04/22-aria-minutes.html carmacleod_ 19:02:03 jongund has joined #aria 19:57:29 jcraig has joined #aria 19:57:37 slightlyoff has joined #aria 19:57:39 jamesn has joined #aria