19:53:38 RRSAgent has joined #dxwgdcat 19:53:38 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/04/14-dxwgdcat-irc 19:53:40 RRSAgent, make logs public 19:53:40 Zakim has joined #dxwgdcat 19:53:42 Meeting: Dataset Exchange Working Group Teleconference 19:53:43 Date: 14 April 2021 19:54:02 present+ 19:54:14 RRSAgent, make logs public 19:54:20 RRSAgent, draft minutes 19:54:20 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/04/14-dxwgdcat-minutes.html riccardoalbertoni 19:54:56 regrets+ DaveBrowning 19:56:16 RRSAgent, draft minutes 19:56:16 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/04/14-dxwgdcat-minutes.html riccardoalbertoni 19:56:55 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 19:56:55 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/04/14-dxwgdcat-minutes.html riccardoalbertoni 19:59:48 PWinstanley has joined #dxwgdcat 20:00:00 alejandra has joined #dxwgdcat 20:00:02 present+ 20:01:37 \me I would wait 5 min as I guess andrea is joining, is that ok? 20:04:08 present+ 20:07:37 Chair: RiccardoAlbertoni 20:07:40 scribenick: PWinstanley 20:07:45 topic: admin 20:07:54 PROPOSED: approve last meeting minutes https://www.w3.org/2021/03/31-dxwgdcat-minutes 20:07:59 +1 20:08:02 proposed: accept minute of last meeting https://www.w3.org/2021/03/31-dxwgdcat-minutes 20:08:08 +1 20:08:18 0 20:08:24 +0 (not present) 20:08:36 resolved: accept minute of last meeting 20:08:44 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2021.04.14 20:09:30 agenda: https://www.w3.org/2021/03/31-dxwgdcat-minutes 20:09:39 meetingL DCAT working group 20:09:45 meeting: DCAT working group 20:09:56 s/meetingL DCAT working group// 20:10:02 +1 to agenda 20:10:56 rrsagent, create minutes v2 20:10:56 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/04/14-dxwgdcat-minutes.html PWinstanley 20:10:59 AndreaPerego has joined #dxwgdcat 20:11:17 present+ 20:11:48 scribenick: PWinstanley 20:11:53 rrsagent, create minutes v2 20:11:53 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/04/14-dxwgdcat-minutes.html PWinstanley 20:12:49 action: alejandra to update the change history to changes about languages 20:12:50 Created ACTION-443 - Update the change history to changes about languages [on Alejandra Gonzalez Beltran - due 2021-04-21]. 20:15:58 q+ 20:16:13 ack AndreaPerego 20:16:31 PWinstanley: suggesting a poll 20:17:07 AndreaPerego: we need to make it clear that this is a draft - so we need to ensure that they only consider stopping it if there is something critical 20:17:47 q+ 20:18:15 AndreaPerego: we can repeat this point 20:18:25 action: PWinstanley to create a poll 20:18:30 Created ACTION-444 - Create a poll [on Peter Winstanley - due 2021-04-21]. 20:19:16 The URL to be sent for review: https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/ 20:20:10 q+ to ask what we do with the open PRs 20:20:31 riccardoalbertoni: so PWinstanley writes the poll and the email, then we get the poll completed before the next plenary and sign off the poll at the next plenary 20:21:04 q? 20:21:32 ack AndreaPerego 20:21:32 AndreaPerego, you wanted to ask what we do with the open PRs 20:21:51 q? 20:21:51 Policy for translations in the RDF of DCAT https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1352 20:22:19 topic: policy for translation in the RDF of DCAT 20:24:12 RRSAgent, draft minutes 20:24:12 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/04/14-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 20:24:31 +q 20:24:45 ack alejandra 20:25:19 alejandra: although it is Simon's PR, it should be straightforward 20:26:02 AndreaPerego: it is also a matter of timing - the link should have been circulated yesterday, but these are minor changes and we can wait 20:27:45 +1 20:27:47 +q 20:28:00 s/+1// 20:28:06 q? 20:28:10 ack alejandra 20:30:18 q+ 20:30:48 alejandra: do we just have English as the main language and do others as best efforts, but otherwise rely on Google or DeepL 20:31:10 AndreaPerego: was wondering if our domain suits automatic translation 20:32:28 ... we can always just look at changes, because some parts of texts have been created and QA'd since DCAT v1 20:32:41 ... this would make the job smaller 20:35:48 proposed: accept a policy of deciding on the best efforts we will provide to translations when we get to the CR stage 20:35:53 +1 20:35:57 +1 20:35:58 +1 20:36:10 resolved: accept a policy of deciding on the best efforts we will provide to translations when we get to the CR stage 20:36:11 +1 20:36:24 RRSAgent, draft minutes 20:36:24 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/04/14-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 20:36:36 Topic: outstanding issues 20:36:49 Specification of range restrictions #1129 20:36:50 riccardoalbertoni: I've selected 2 issues: 20:37:08 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1129 20:37:38 20:38:14 riccardoalbertoni: we are restricting the range of media-type using a controlled list 20:38:50 ... using the meaning in the RFC spec indicating that the IANA media file must be used unless there is a good reason not to 20:39:49 q1: Is there another Machine readible document, like shacl, that expresses then the restriction? 20:40:48 q+ 20:40:48 ... we have decided we are not going to provide other resources because the spec in the document is sufficient. I don't know if we will change this. 20:41:09 ack AndreaPerego 20:41:51 AndreaPerego: I think that there might be a mismatch between the spec and what people think is in the spec - it is a 'should' not a 'must'. This is just like dcterms. 20:42:13 ... sometimes people read the spec and thing that everything is 'must' rather than a recommendation 20:42:58 ... given a choice then we would recommend IANA, but if a community already has its list then that's fine to continue using 20:43:59 riccardoalbertoni: I think part of the problem is how people read the usage note 20:44:26 The “usage notes” provide guidance that might be useful indications but generally are not mapped as machine readable constraints. We use the RFC 2119 to express the level of expected compliance. In the specific case, we use “SHOULD” explicitly referring to the RFC 2119, which implies that iana mediaType are recommended unless there is a valid reason to ignore the indication. The full implications must be u[CUT] 20:45:31 q+ 20:45:40 ack AndreaPerego 20:46:03 AndreaPerego: I think that even the explanation would be misunderstood 20:46:57 ... so we just say that unless we use 'must' (which is only seldom used) we should indicate that everything is just a recommendation - some guidance 20:47:15 ... but we should approach this case by case 20:47:57 q+ 20:49:51 ack AndreaPerego 20:50:36 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1195 20:51:05 +q 20:51:46 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1195#issuecomment-818063968 20:51:57 ack alejandra 20:55:24 q+ 20:57:12 ack riccardoalbertoni 20:57:42 alejandra: I was assigned to this issue a while back. I've looked at the whole conversation 20:58:59 q+ 20:59:04 riccardoalbertoni: they are looking for an update to the DCAT definition of 'dataset' in order to accommodate their definitions. We are generally refraining from varying to the needs of specific communities. I didn't see any of the examples provided as being outwith the DCAT definition 20:59:08 +1 21:01:15 riccardoalbertoni: we can deal with objections on a case by case basis, but perhaps we need to make more about the design principles? 21:01:59 q? 21:02:59 ack AndreaPerego 21:06:12 alejandra: I had made a proposal on how to address a minor change to the definition, but I don't think any of the "note to entries" are necessary, as we cover those cases 21:09:21 q? 21:09:53 riccardoalbertoni: AndreaPerego had a good wording for the issue ... 21:10:22 proposal: Review the use of SHOULD, MAY, MUST, etc. to check if they should be lowercase or uppercase 21:12:54 +1 21:12:58 +1 21:13:00 +1 21:13:05 +1 21:13:18 present- 21:13:18 resolved: Review the use of SHOULD, MAY, MUST, etc. to check if they should be lowercase or uppercase 21:13:36 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1326 21:14:32 scribenick: AndreaPerego 21:14:52 alejandra: Revised PR ^^ as decided. 21:23:34 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1354 21:28:10 alejandra: Created PR ^^ for the changes in the basic example. 21:28:47 ... Discussion continued on closing some PRs... 21:28:50 riccardoalbertoni: Thanks everyone. 21:28:56 [meeting adjourned] 21:29:03 RRSAgent, draft minutes 21:29:03 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/04/14-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego