20:59:23 RRSAgent has joined #dxwg 20:59:23 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/03/23-dxwg-irc 20:59:27 kcoyle has joined #dxwg 20:59:35 rrsagent, make logs public 20:59:45 chair: PWinstanley 20:59:53 antoine has joined #dxwg 21:00:51 regrets+ RiccardoAlbertoni, antoine, Alejandra 21:01:48 meeting: DXWG Plenary 21:01:56 present+ antoine 21:02:15 agenda: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2021.03.23 21:02:29 rrsagent, create minutes v2 21:02:29 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/03/23-dxwg-minutes.html PWinstanley 21:02:59 Ana has joined #dxwg 21:04:13 Rachel has joined #DXWG 21:04:27 present+ 21:04:33 present+ 21:04:59 present+ 21:05:23 zakim, whoi is here? 21:05:23 sorry, antoine, I do not understand your question 21:05:27 zakim, who is here? 21:05:27 Present: PWinstanley, antoine, kcoyle, Rachel, AndreaPerego, plh, annette_g, Caroline_, !, roba, Ana 21:05:29 On IRC I see Rachel, Ana, antoine, kcoyle, RRSAgent, PWinstanley, roba, bigbluehat, Zakim, hadleybeeman, rhiaro, trackbot 21:05:34 scribenick: antoine 21:05:52 Topic: admin 21:06:04 rrsagent, please draft minutes v2 21:06:04 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/03/23-dxwg-minutes.html antoine 21:06:08 proposed: accept https://www.w3.org/2021/03/09-dxwg-minutes 21:06:14 +1 21:06:18 present+ 21:06:21 DaveBrowning has joined #dxwg 21:06:21 +1 21:06:23 present+ 21:06:27 regrets- antoine 21:06:28 +1 21:06:33 plh has joined #dxwg 21:06:35 present+ plh 21:06:36 presents+ 21:06:38 0 (not attending) 21:06:43 present+ 21:07:00 +1 21:07:24 PWinstanley: we had a doodle poll for the call time 21:07:48 20 for the current time 21:07:54 10 for one hour later 21:08:02 7 for two hours later 21:08:31 ... more people don't want the other time than these who want it 21:08:49 ... can we do a compromise for the Pacific zones? 21:08:56 plh: we could rotate 21:09:11 ... several groups do this 21:09:49 No objection for trying 21:10:10 PWinstanley: the compriomise would be to go for the middle one 21:11:26 ... this would put CET towards midnight 21:11:42 antoine: some of the DCAT groups are in the same situation 21:11:50 roba: I'm in Melbourne 21:12:04 PWinstanley: would you turn up? 21:12:19 roba: PROV needs to move through open issues 21:12:33 ... and then we could delegate someone to report in the general calls 21:13:15 ... the earlier one is ok for EU and US and my feeling would be to go for it 21:13:34 PWinstanley: we could rotate sometimes 21:13:50 resolved: accept https://www.w3.org/2021/03/09-dxwg-minutes 21:14:33 roba: simon, nick and I are the ones impacted 21:14:56 rrsagent, draft minutes v2 21:14:56 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/03/23-dxwg-minutes.html DaveBrowning 21:16:25 20:00 UTC would be 22:00 CET 21:16:38 https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?month=4&day=23&year=2021&p1=43&p2=195&p3=224&p4=33&p5=248&p6=136&p7=64&p8=216&p9=152&iv=0 21:16:51 https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?month=7&day=23&year=2021&p1=43&p2=195&p3=224&p4=33&p5=248&p6=136&p7=64&p8=216&p9=152&iv=0 21:17:45 plh: ... and 6am Melbourne 21:18:02 ... and 4pm Boston 21:18:07 dsr has joined #dxwg 21:18:12 proposed: timing of next meetings is 20:00 UTC 21:18:39 plh: roba if you have something to report you can ask to shift! 21:19:04 roba: it should be alright 21:19:22 plh: I wouldn't have to change 21:19:28 ... the reservation 21:19:38 PWinstanley: how are people feeling about 20:00 UTC? 21:19:41 +1 21:19:41 +1 21:19:45 +1 21:19:46 +1 21:19:46 +1 21:19:49 +1 21:19:50 +1 21:19:53 AndreaPerego has joined #dxwg 21:20:10 +1 21:20:13 resolved: timing of next meetings is 20:00 UTC 21:20:59 plh: there is a new calendar system 21:21:11 ... when I will set up you will receive a calendar invitation 21:21:14 q+ 21:21:19 ack antoine 21:21:35 antoine: will that invitation include a direct webex link? 21:21:41 q+ 21:21:44 RRSAgent, draft minutes 21:21:44 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/03/23-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:21:50 plh: yes, and you can add to outlook etc 21:21:54 ack DaveBrowning 21:22:06 Antoine: hurray! 21:22:19 DaveBrowning: is this going to use the email of the members? 21:22:32 plh: it's going to use the member list 21:22:39 DaveBrowning: I have problems accessing it 21:22:47 ... I'll drop you an email 21:23:05 Topic: PROF 21:23:23 roba: I've reviewed the open issues 21:23:39 ... we need to have a doodle to find time to discuss them 21:23:54 ... there was a discussion on naming elements 21:24:03 PWinstanley: this was related to the github? 21:24:10 ... the cleanup? 21:24:35 roba: issued have been moved when the new repos were created 21:25:05 ... there are some related issues in the DCAT space though (e.g. on the semantics of profiling and conformance) 21:25:27 ... there are some implementation things 21:25:35 ... it works fine as is 21:25:51 ... The Conneg-P got deployed to the ??? environment 21:25:59 ... there is discussion inside the IETF 21:26:13 ... on where it could have a home inside IETF 21:26:20 s/???/OGC/ 21:26:24 ... I can try to get a report from the people involved 21:26:46 action: roba to get report on IETF situation for Conneg-P from Lars & Ruben 21:26:47 Created ACTION-441 - to get report on ietf situation for conneg-p from lars & ruben [on Rob Atkinson - due 2021-03-30]. 21:27:07 ... there's a chicken-and-egg wrt implementation by UGC and standardization by IETF 21:27:14 ... I don't know when it will resolve 21:27:20 s/UGC/OGC/ 21:27:21 s/UGC/OGC/ 21:27:55 Topic: DCAT 21:28:20 AndreaPerego: in the last two weeks we've looked at open issues 21:28:27 ... mainly working on dataset series 21:28:35 ... we've got a section in the editor draft 21:28:43 ... requires more work as there is ongoing discussion 21:29:10 ... new class DatasetSeries and related properties 21:29:23 ... there is discussion about inverse properties 21:29:35 ... this is a more general discussion on DCAT 21:29:58 ... for example request for inverse properties for the link between dataset and distributions 21:30:17 ... we may use the PROV approach to deal with inverses. 21:30:40 ... i.e. "we don't provide them but we give guidance for implementers to create them for their use cases" 21:30:53 PWinstanley: is there a showstopper for inverse properties? 21:31:16 AndreaPerego: Defining a property and its inverse may have impact on implementation and interop 21:31:31 ... if some implementations use only one of them (and not all systems use inference) 21:31:47 ... On the other side for some use case the 'other way round' helps 21:32:00 ... We're trying to find a compromise between the two. 21:32:33 ... For the moment the approach of implementing only one direction and follow the PROV approach 21:32:52 PWinstanley: how about non-RDF implementation? We should be implementation-agnostic 21:33:14 AndreaPerego: some DCAT would-be implementers have XML-based systems 21:33:26 ... and could implement DCAT via XML schemas 21:33:41 ... [gives two examples] 21:35:06 PWinstanley: could colleagues have a look at them? 21:35:08 q+ 21:35:11 rrsagent, draft minutes v2 21:35:11 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/03/23-dxwg-minutes.html DaveBrowning 21:35:13 ack antoine 21:35:47 antoine: it could help if some issues were highlighted - sometimes it is difficult to find the most important issues 21:35:54 ... among many other things 21:36:04 AndreaPerego: I'm also getting many notifications :-) 21:36:23 ... we're trying to reduce the scope of each issue 21:36:28 +1 21:36:53 ... the result is that it increases the amount of notifications 21:37:21 PWinstanley: two aspects: atomic PRs vs number of issues 21:38:06 thats the same problem we have had with prof - too many general discussions about wider guidance and too hard to focus on issues of either vocab or api capability. 21:38:17 AndreaPerego: discussions extend and that creates proliferation 21:38:20 q+ 21:38:34 ack antoine 21:39:13 antoine: would it be helpful for an email to be sent following the DCAT meeting with a pointer to key issues that need feedback? 21:39:25 +1 21:39:25 +1 to antoine 21:39:27 AndreaPerego: yes, will do 21:39:57 Topic: Github cleanup 21:39:59 RRSAgent, draft minutes 21:39:59 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/03/23-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:40:37 PWinstanley: there are issues on Use Cases and Profile Guidance to be tidied up 21:40:55 ... this needs to be done when people have time 21:41:21 rrsagent, please draft minutes v2 21:41:21 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/03/23-dxwg-minutes.html antoine 21:41:44 rrsagent, please draft minutes v2 21:41:44 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/03/23-dxwg-minutes.html antoine 21:41:46 Thanks, bye bye 21:41:48 bye 21:41:49 Bye 21:41:57 thank you, bye 21:42:14 rrsagent, please draft minutes v2 21:42:14 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/03/23-dxwg-minutes.html PWinstanley 21:43:17 present- ! 21:43:19 RRSAgent, draft minutes 21:43:19 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/03/23-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:44:11 s/20:00/... 20:00/ 21:44:13 RRSAgent, draft minutes 21:44:13 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/03/23-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:45:26 s/... 20:00/20:00/ 21:45:27 RRSAgent, draft minutes 21:45:27 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/03/23-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:46:13 s/20:00 UTC would be 22:00 CET/... 20:00 UTC would be 22:00 CET/ 21:46:14 RRSAgent, draft minutes 21:46:14 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/03/23-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:54:54 regrets+ Annette 21:54:56 RRSAgent, draft minutes 21:54:56 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/03/23-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego 22:02:54 dsr has joined #dxwg