Meeting minutes
<Caroline_> https://
<Caroline_> https://
PROPOSED to accept minutes
<annette_g> +1
<Ana> +1
<riccardoAlbertoni> +1
0
<plh> +1
<Rachel> +1
<AndreaPerego> +1
<Caroline_> +0 wasnt'there
Resolution: accept minutes of last call https://
s
DCAT subgroup
riccardoAlbertoni: we stopped activities during holidays
… DCAT 3 was published before the holidays
… we've started spreading the word
… to get feedback
… maybe members of the group can help
<riccardoAlbertoni> https://
<riccardoAlbertoni> https://
riccardoAlbertoni: this is the list of the request for feedback, and the list of persons to contact
… I can provide access to whoever asks
… we will resume regular sub-groups meetings
<Rachel> can you please share the sub group next call details ?
riccardoAlbertoni: we have 95 issues currently open
<riccardoAlbertoni> https://
riccardoAlbertoni: this is the project list, organized by Andrea
riccardoAlbertoni: we are going to share the agenda asap
Caroline_: does the first link (letter) need to be closed?
… can we make suggestions?
riccardoAlbertoni: we've already sent some messages
… it's never too late, but it should be important :-)
… we can share the letter with anyone who is interested in contacting people
Caroline_: maybe you could open access to everyone?
riccardoAlbertoni: it should be open now
Caroline_: are you still meeting according to the regular schedule and the wiki?
riccardoAlbertoni: we send the details. People seem not able to access the details for the calls on the wiki
<Caroline_> https://
riccardoAlbertoni: yes we still put meetings there
AndreaPerego: we usually send the agenda on the mailing list
<AndreaPerego> https://
AndreaPerego: regarding the letter template, the same text has been sent to the mailing list (link above)
PROF
Caroline_: we should reach out to Nick and Rob
Feedback sought on reorganizing the list of W3C Technical Reports
<Caroline_> https://
Caroline_: if you can have a look, it's useful
… Dominique is asking feedback
<Caroline_> Antoine: it does seem a good idea
<Caroline_> ... what would be the idea for grouping
<Caroline_> ... there will be some discussion about the logical grouping
<Caroline_> ... using semantic web could be useful
<Caroline_> ... I am wondering if using the WG as additional layer
<Caroline_> ... could work
annette_g: I agree, organizing by subject grouping makes sense
… doing it by activity could make sense on the top level
… doing it by wg could be problematic if some items change ownership
… the current proposal looks quite unevenly balanced
… it would be good to have more balanced distribution
+1
AndreaPerego: there are still too many groups
… maybe there could be some faceted search
… it's difficult to scroll down
… looking at the variety and quantity of reports, it could make sense to have different ways of grouping
… for example XML technology, or Semantic Web vocabularies
… or most recent versions, or status of document
<annette_g> +1 for faceted search
<riccardoAlbertoni> +1 to grouping by facets (e.g., group, activity, inprogress, )
AndreaPerego: maybe using an approach like the one of data catalogs (faceted search) could help
… people to find what they're looking for
plh: a a bit of history
… the TR page was a flat list
… it was changed 15 years ago, putting specs in buckets.
… 7 or 8 families of buckets
… people were complaining about the difficulty of finding things
… 3-4 years ago we went back to the list approach
… but with a search function
… we wanted to keep things as simple as possible
… we have hired a professional information/page expert
<plh> https://
plh: The current page defines what is a recommendation and what is not, to some extent
plh: people should feel free to comment here or on the mailing list
<plh> https://
annette_g: it's clear it will need some kind of searching/filtering
… if there's a design team thinking about it, I feel confident about it
antoine: would replying by pointing to minutes ok?
plh: yes
… I can do it
<riccardoAlbertoni> https://
riccardoAlbertoni: the function allows to see e.g. things related to Semantic Web and their classification
… and it is very satisfying for me
… I am not sure that the grouping is a step forward
… maybe if some queries are not satisfied
plh the precise link is https://
<Caroline_> https://
back to DCAT
Caroline_: we need to be careful about using the sheet above for contacting the appropriate people
actions
Caroline_: actions are old
… most recent one is October
Andrea: Action 434. This was not included in DCAT v3
… we'll have to discuss whether we want to include it in the next WD
Antoine: the old actions on Profile Guidance are a bit like a backlog
… not touched on since Profile Guidance is inactive
<AndreaPerego> close action-400
<trackbot> Closed action-400.
Antoine: if we could keep them for the moment, with the understanding that they are not to be progressed on right now it would be better
Caroline_: ok
Caroline_: AOB?
… meeting adjourned
<Rachel> thank bye