Meeting minutes
Current Progress of MiniApp WG charter
angel: charter update?
xiaoqian: I can give some update, xfq may give more details
… W3C management approved sending the WG charter for AC review
… may send it to the AC this week
… may end the AC review this year
… needs some time to resolve potential FOs after the AC review
xiaoqian: expectation is to launch the group in January, before the Chinese New Year
Angel: good to know. Thank you xiaoqian!
xiaoqian: you're welcome
angel: when will the draft announcement be sent?
xfq: I've sent draft to w3c comm team for internal review on the draft announcement
Angel: do they normally announce on either Tue or Thu?
xfq: Tue/Thu are for publications. We can announce charter cfr whenever applicable
Wendy: Thanks Fuqiao and all for getting this out for AC review.
<xiaoqian> https://
Charter related Issues
<Angel> https://
angel: We have 4 open issues for the charter
https://github.com/w3c/miniapp/issues/75
Angel: Yves responded, is it ok to close the issue?
… hearing no objections, so ok to close #75
https://github.com/w3c/miniapp/issues/76
angel: I responded to Sam, and he seemed to be OK with the current wording
… I think we're OK to close this one.
https://github.com/w3c/miniapp/issues/141
angel: "Super applications" may make sense in certain contexts for some miniapp vendors
… but may confuse people
angel: Fuqiao changed "including super applications and native operating systems" to "applications or operating systems that are hosts to MiniApps"
… is everyone OK with this change?
… is it clear enough?
https://github.com/w3c/miniapp/issues/145
angel: from Sam, about defining/explaining "UI component"
angel: is the rest of the group ok with proposed edits by Fuqiao?
… hearing no objections, let's close this issue
… I think we have closed all open issues against the WG charter
… we do have some new issues, like https://
… we can worry about this issue after the AC review
xfq: I've already reflected all the changes to the proposed draft charter
… there's another issue I'd like to I would like the CG to pay attention to, which is:
https://github.com/w3c/miniapp/issues/142
https://
[xfq introduces the issue]
xfq: I added comments following W3C Management team's suggestion, please check.
[silence]
angel: there seems to be no objections
next steps for CG and WG
Angel: any new incubating ideas on MiniApps?
Qing_An: I recall discussions during our July MiniApps workshop, that MiniApp APIs for IoT
https://
https://
<QingAn> IoT MiniApp API, like Bluetooth Mesh API
Yongjing: Packaging spec states that we may develop security aspects, so we can start preparing a draft for it.
… another thing to incubate is UI components
… common UI components that can be useful for miniapps
angel: thank you Yongjing!
<QingAn> IoT MiniApp API, like Bluetooth Mesh API
Wendy: Thanks for your considerations on security aspects. Feel free to let the security review community in W3C know and review them.
Xiaoqian: Bluetooth Mesh API on IoT
… we have some ongoing work on them in DAS WG
… Fuqiao and Qing_An probably can talk in further
Angel: curious about the FO on the DAS rechartering, any potential impact on MiniApps work?
xfq: first, the Web Bluetooth specification is developed by the Web Bluetooth CG, not in the DAS WG charter
… the Web Bluetooth specification describes an API to discover and communicate with devices over the Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) mode
… Bluetooth Mesh is not supported
xfq: DAS recharter has been actually approved and the announcement should follow shortly.
Angel: now we have MiniApp Addressing, UI components, Bluetooth Mesh API on IoT, security aspects of Packaging spec to consider to incubate
Yongqing_Dong: this is Yongqing_Dong from Xiaomi
… I have two ideas for us to incubate
… one is the introduction and invocation of system capabilities
… the other is the management and loading mechanism of page application container
angel: do you have any details?
Yongqing_Dong: I'd like to write them down after this meeting
Angel: I encourage all group members who raised incubating ideas to write them down somewhere, e.g., on GitHub.
… any other new ideas, questions, comments?
Tengyuan: we would like to adding dereferencing section of packaging spec
… and security, signature prosessing, etc.
Yongjing_Zhang: if there's no other topic, I'd like to point out there are several open issues we can close regarding the manifest spec
<Angel> https://
Yongjing_Zhang: several are related to the extension of WAM
… many members of MAM are now inherited from WAM
… many of those are i18n-related issues
… don't need to address them today
… maybe xfq can look at them
xfq: I'll discuss the i18n-related issues with the i18n WG today
… I'll also have a look at the other issues and pull requests
… encourage other participants in the CG to look at them as well
Angel: please check with Addison, xfq
xfq: will do
Next call
Angel: how about Dec 10?
<xiaoqian> +1
Angel: same time, UTC 12:00 noon
… people may be on vacation on Dec 17
… the charter will be under AC review
<Yongjing> ok with me
<martin> +1 to Dec 10
Angel: we can discuss comments and objections during the AC review
… hearing no objection
AOB
Angel: any other issue?
[adjourned]