<kaz> scribenick: cris
<kaz> Nov-10
Sebastian: there were some good
feedback from Philipp
... one open point was to ask information about marketing
activies to w3c team
... were there some feedback about our presence on different
multimedia platforms?
Kaz: do you want me to talk with them?
(Sebastian will check with Coralie.)
Sebastian: no objections to publish the
minutes?
... ok approved
Sebastian: we have an update from the creator. The link is not public yet, I don't wont to share it before we have approved it.
(sebastian shows the video)
Sebastian: not bad
... any comments?
Daniel: the voice is not final. It is from the animator as a placeholder
Sebastian: we decided for a female
voice in the final version
... I already provided feeback about the dashboard displayed in
the video
... also a scene is quite long and too much abstract
... I suggested to add drawings about different IoT
protocols
... the voice over repets too often the wot term
... the end is unlinked to the beginning
... finally, the logos in the ending should be larger
Cristiano: it feels abstract when explaning TD documents and technologies
Sebastian: it is quite difficult to
display such details in the video
... the scene it also is pretty short
Daniel: in the final ending scene it would be better to leave an url
Sebastian: do we know the URL?
Daniel: I think the URL above might not change in the future
Kaz: I think it is fine, if we all agree
McCool: is it the best entry point?
Sebastian: that web page is not the best. Problably we should finalize the website and use that one.
McCool: in Japan usually people show keywords to be used in a search engine
Cristiano: we could leave the link in the description (when posted on youtube platform)
Sebastian: yeah it might be a good idea
McCool: however, the video could be
shown outside from youtube context.
... I don't mind to use the main page linked above, as long the
first thing they see is a redirection to the new website.
Sebastian: I made a proposal on how to
handle the new website URL
... basically I proposed to use a sub directory as a
redirection to our site.
Kaz: I think Coralie was OK with
our using www.w3.org/WoT/Welcome URI for our WoT Welcome page
(=https://w3c.github.io/wot-marketing/)
... however we were thinking about /WoT/IG rather than
/Welcome/IG
McCool: Another question is timing. We have to publish the website (and fix URL issue) before video finalization
Sebastian: I think there's no problem to add just the URL at the end of the video
McCool: we could even create multiple ending versions with different URLs
Cristiano: we could use a video editing software to add the link
McCool: I think it is not a big deal for the animator
Kaz: logo colors are modified
McCool: yeah, we should notify him and ask not to mess with the colors.
<kaz> W3C official logo
McCool: he's using also some filter to boost the contrast
Sebastian: ok, I'll report your input
Sebastian: can we use my proposal for the website
Kaz: we already checked with Coraline and the scheme is fine. The only difference is that we agree for /WoT/IG and not /Welcome/IG
Sebastian: is it possible to have /WoT/IG ?
Daniel: I think it is easier if everthing is under /Welcome. The other way around is possible
<kaz> Kaz notes that we already have https://www.w3.org/WoT/WG/ as the WoT WG page and https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/ as the IG page
Daniel: however it is not the real issue. We should start from the welcome page and then think about this issue
Kaz: we have a conflict. We
already have defined WoT/IG and WoT/WG
... we could just redirect those pages to the new one
Sebastian: yes the idea is to redirect WoT/IG to /Welcome/IG
Kaz: when should we resolve this
issue?
... several months ago we started looking to migrate current
content of IG and WG pages. Should we solve this before the
redirection?
Daniel: yes we should wait
... let's try to resolve as many issue as we can
Kaz: we should focus on the welcome page and should be able to use WoT/welcome as the portal link for the video as well
Sebastian: is Coralie ok?
Kaz: she agreed with your proposal on that usage of WoT/welcome already, I think.
Sebastian: I'll ping back to her just to be sure
<sebastian> proposal: if the W3C Marcom Team is ok with the new URL w3.org/WoT/Welcome as landing page of the new WoT Welcome page we will use this URL in the animation video
RESOLUTION: if the W3C Marcom Team is ok with the new URL w3.org/WoT/Welcome as landing page of the new WoT Welcome page we will use this URL in the animation video
<kaz> July 30
Kaz: by the way, in July when we had this discussion, you already mentioned a similar URL and checked with Coralie.
<kaz> but "WoT/welcome" instead of "WoT/Welcome"
Sebastian: it seems that it was before I sent my proposal
Kaz: we should decide whether we use capital letter (WoT/Welcome) or not (WoT/welcome)
Daniel: I think usually it is not
case sensitive
... e.g. welcome is the same as Welcome
Kaz: It depends on the server setting.
<inserted> PR 90
Daniel: I made several
changes
... the first one is a new inverted logo
McCool: I don't like the inverted logo
Cristiano: however the bar looks better
McCool: what about moving the logo outside the bar?
Daniel: we should also add the
w3c logo
... we could move both of them above the navigation bar
McCool: I agree
Daniel: I moved also the meeting page into a activities category
McCool: I see that we have acronisms in the upper bar. It is confusing for newcomers
Daniel: I think we can improve it when we'll move the logo
McCool: how it looks on the phone
Daniel: it is a responsive
design
... we shold define a description for the activities page
McCool: we should add PlugFest under activities
Daniel: could we merge this version so that we can incrementaly improve it.
<kaz> fyi, WoT WS page: https://www.w3.org/WoT/ws-2019/cfp.html
Kaz: please check the link above for an idea where to place the logo of W3C and WoT. a possible option.
Sebastian: thank you very much for the
update!
... we have still some open points in the agenda. We'll discuss
them next time
... let's adjourn
