<kaz> scribenick: andrea_cimmino
<kaz> Nov-9
meeting starts reviewing the minutes from the previous call on Nov 9 and the vTPAC
first the ones from the 2020/11/09
<kaz> approved
<kaz> vTPAC minutes
syntactic search review from TPAC slides
McCool: we should clarify short
applies both JSON Path and XPath
... ....put space between words connected with &
... ....any comments in the syntactic query session?
no comments in regards of syntactic search
<kaz> (fixed the typos)
Andrea: ....maybe the distributed search among TDDs was the most interesting part
McCool: ...federation could be an optional feature maybe
Andrea: ... but in the case of the TDDs I think the federation as it is is not as suitable as an ad-hoc discovery algorithm
mccool creates an issue for the further discussion on this topic
Farshid: are there two ways of federation?
McCool: we need to check the specification
all the issues and questions about this topic are included in the issue created
<FarshidT> https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/34
Issue #97
issue link: https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/97
mccool creates another issue with the necessity of having a model for the directory
this issue is directly related with the federation one
<FarshidT> https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/30
link to the issue of the information module
https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/98
<cris_> https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/18
mccool is grouping a set of related issues under the issue number #98
McCool: ...another issue is how to summarize the information stored in a TDD registered in another semantic issue that could be interesting is the validation, should we use shapes?
McCool: ...maybe that is too much, we have Json schema
Cristiano: ...maybe we could have a semantic and a syntactic level of validation?
mccool creates a new issue to discuss this matter
link to the issue: https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/99
<McCool> https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/99
<kaz> kaz: maybe something more than what Playground does. so agree we should re-define validation for WoT Discovery
currently, LinkSmart is not using SPARQL
McCool: is somebody else working on another?
Andrea is working on one, and Cristiano also will work on that very likely
this finishes the TPAC meeting minutes review
<McCool> proposal: discovery sections of the TPAC 2020 minutes are now suitable for release
RESOLUTION: discovery sections of the TPAC 2020 minutes have been reviewed by the Discovery TF and are now suitable for release
<inserted> Issue 79
now the group reviews the issues
McCool: one issue is the dynamic injection of values into TDs
Andrea: I have a publication on
that
... the link for the publication https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/3/822
several members from the Discovery TF agree that the dynamic injection should not be mandatory
<kaz> McCool's new comments
<McCool> https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/196
McCool added a new security issue for Thing Model, do we want to have mandatory security requirements for TDD?
McCool: ...this could lead to DoS
attacks
... ...we could mitigate this
... ..by rate limiting queries from an entity
Farshid: maybe we could have the mitigation apart from the implementation
McCool: we can write down the mitigation as pointers
this discussion is written down in issue #96
issue link: https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/96
<McCool> https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/86
meeting is finished