<jasonjgw> zakim list agenda

<scott_h> running late but will be coming soon

<scribe> scribe: janina

Miscellaneous updates.

js: Reminds everyone of the open CfC expiring tonight on working drafts

<jasonjgw> Janina notes the open APA Call for Consensus to allow task forces as well as the working group to publish updated working drafts at will. First public working drafts and final Notes still would require CfCs.

<jasonjgw> Janina notes that it closes this evening at midnight US eastern time.

jb: Shares concerns of how this works across different TFs

Remote Meetings Doc

jb: Recalls list comment about taking the doc to Note

js: Believe that was in this call

jb: Believe RQTF has done well to struct the doc
... But much of the remaining content is a hodgepodge
... Some already outdated
... Having trouble seeing the doc as a TR tech report
... Not much that's "noteworthy"

<jasonjgw> Janina suggests that if it is to continue to be worked on, it needs a status of some kind.

js: asks what other W3C status is available

jb: AGWG has resources as does EO

sh: WCAG Techniques fit into WCAG
... But meetings isn't anchored like that

jb: Believe parts could fit under WCAG
... Or some might be EO

jgw: If we can reasonably pass it on without fragmenting it, that would be fine.
... Reminds he'll be unavailable for work on it

sh: Some things may not fit WCAG -- we've exposed some needs here -- e.g. captioning but not recording off minutes
... Should be specifically under a Remote Meetings heading, though

jb: Have been seeing more tips and guidance pubs -- mostly ad hoc
... Encourages people to review current draft for the conversationof note or not note

jgw: Agree with JS that Silver not in a position to really develop this just now
... It would need to live somewhere in the interim, and still with no official status
... Yet we want to make it available to people who need it
... Agree there are process issues to address
... If we're to end up informing normative guidance, we need to work out when and how

jb: Thinking it may add techniques to 2.x
... Please reread to see what parts should stay should we agree to go note track
... Please reread to inform a conversation based on a fresh review of doc content

Media synchronization requirements.

jb: Created wiki page and documented issues

<jasonjgw> https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/task-forces/research-questions/wiki/Media_Synchronization_Requirements

jgw: Please review and suggest enhancements

RTC Accessibility User Requirements (RAUR) open issues.

<joconnor> https://github.com/w3c/apa/issues/42

<joconnor> Section 2.6: REQ 8a only refers to real-time text, but User Need 8 seems to be calling for something more #42

jgw: i42 -- various combos of voice/video/text

jo: suggest clarifying

<joconnor> JS: We know some of these can compete

<joconnor> It way be done in software, I dont mind as long as the user need is met

<joconnor> Does a signer need to be in a gallery type view.

<joconnor> Or if someone is speaking via signing etc for someone else?

<joconnor> Like breakout rooms in zoom

<joconnor> works very smoothly..

<joconnor> JOC: Total conversation may be a bigger fish at the moment

<joconnor> JS: We may need to have a wider conversation around this.

RESOLUTION: It's an ongoing conversation that will bring up new scenarios

<joconnor> https://github.com/w3c/apa/issues/41

<joconnor> REQ 2b: doesn’t make sense in view of the role of screen readers in controlling the attached braille device. #41

jo: i41 -- also from jgw -- issue controlling attached braille device
... can't find the reference ...

jgw: probably a text correction
... If I can by next week ...

jo: closing for now

js: can always reopen

jo: need to get a draft out

<joconnor> https://github.com/w3c/apa/issues/40

jgw: believe it will be easy when we find it

<joconnor> Section 2.2: User need 2 – It isn’t clear what the need is here. #40

jo: i40
... believe this has been dealt with
... believe i worked on text
... i39

<joconnor> https://github.com/w3c/apa/issues/39

<joconnor> Section 2.1: Req 1a – consider dividing this into different cases and elaborating each of them.

<joconnor> FIXED

jo: seems addressed

<joconnor> as is Issue 40

jo: so, we're done and can update

This is scribe.perl Revision of Date 
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Default Present: jasonjgw, janina, nicolocarp, Joshue108_, SteveNoble, scott_h, Judy
Present: jasonjgw janina nicolocarp Joshue108_ SteveNoble scott_h Judy
Found Scribe: janina
Inferring ScribeNick: janina
Found Date: 26 Aug 2020
People with action items: 

WARNING: IRC log location not specified!  (You can ignore this 
warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain 
a link to the original IRC log.)