Review document: https://www.w3.org/2019/Process-20190301/
Editor's draft: https://w3c.github.io/w3process/
The following color coding convention is used for comments:
Open issues are marked like this
An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope,
Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted.
Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.
Issue 1. # Summary: Define "independent". From: Nigel Meggit Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/167 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/167#issuecomment-367498122 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/167#issuecomment-372415200 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/167#issuecomment-380498842 Closed: Deferred
Issue 2. # Summary: Clarification of Introduction From: Rachel Comerford Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/232 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/232#issuecomment-445088494 Closed: Retracted Verified: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/232#event-2359816536
Issue 3. # Summary: TAG Appointment via a NomCom From: Natasha Rooney Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/230 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/230#issuecomment-442692389 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/230#issuecomment-442721522 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/230#issuecomment-443498734 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/230#issuecomment-443529197 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/230#issuecomment-443814364 Closed: Deferred
Issue 4. # Summary: Misleading characterisation about WDs in 6.2.1 From: David Singer Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/235 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/235#issuecomment-449206538 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/235#issuecomment-449347229 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/235#issuecomment-451580525 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/235#issuecomment-451613228 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/235#issuecomment-451910585 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/235#issuecomment-461233194 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/235#issuecomment-490509529
Issue 5. # Summary: Does the process assume all WDs are on the Rec. Track? From: Nigel Megitt Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/236 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/236#issuecomment-494898411 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/236#issuecomment-514654606 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/236#issuecomment-642704181 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/236#issuecomment-643057849 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/236#issuecomment-643217094 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/236#issuecomment-643579948 Closed: Deferred Verified: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/236#issuecomment-643969336
Issue 6. # Summary: Clarification on vacant seats and elections From: David Baron Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/238 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/238#issuecomment-485549398 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/238#issuecomment-494497999 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/238#issuecomment-494593856 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/238#issuecomment-494701431 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/238#issuecomment-494706103 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/286 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/238#issuecomment-506748061
Issue 7. # Summary: Allow AB to choose its own chair From: Elika Etemad Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/223 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/225 Closed: Deferred Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/223#issuecomment-490326127
Issue 8. # Summary: Add an index of Terms and Acronyms From: Natasha Rooney Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/198 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/198#issuecomment-461235578 Closed: Accepted
Issue 9. # Summary: Clarify how Superseded state interacts with other maintenance processes From: David Baron Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/183 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/183#issuecomment-386461173 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/183#issuecomment-386465352 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/183#issuecomment-386472282 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/183#issuecomment-386865827 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/213 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/213#issuecomment-530399323
Issue 10. # Summary: Define charter review process to require addressing comments From: Elika Etemad Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/182 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/182#issuecomment-385958175 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/182#issuecomment-386750897 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/182#issuecomment-387124626 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/182#issuecomment-388929432 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/182#issuecomment-389719860 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/182#issuecomment-390356337 Closed: Deferred
Issue 11. # Summary: Review the role of the Director in the process document From: David Singer Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/173 Closed: Duplicate Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/173#issuecomment-514367457 Verified: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/173#issuecomment-514367457
Issue 12. # Summary: We need a process for handling registries, APIs and other enumerations From: David Singer Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/168 Closed: Deferred
Issue 13. # Summary: Should the process include something about Testing? From: Natasha Rooney Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/157 Closed: Deferred
Issue 14. # Summary: provide clearer/common wording for transitions to Obsolete/Superseded status From: Tantek Çelik Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/141 Closed: Deferred
Issue 15. # Summary: Concerns about Amended Recommendations From: Andreas Tai Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/137 Closed: Deferred
Issue 16. # Summary: Enumerate the requirements for wide review From: Nigel Megitt Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/130 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/264 Closed: Deferred
Issue 17. # Summary: Process should say how W3T can update NOTES From: Ralph Swick Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/120 Closed: Deferred
Issue 18. # Summary: We need to consider equal-preference voting From: David Signer Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/115 Closed: Deferred
Issue 19. # Summary: Should the process allow REC->WD transition directly? From: David Baron Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/103 Closed: Deferred
Issue 20. # Summary: Update Graphics From: Charles McCathie Nevile Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/91 Closed: Retracted Verified: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/91#issuecomment-442686352
Issue 21. # Summary: Process supporting "Living Standards"? From: https://github.com/joanmarie Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/79 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/79#issuecomment-597657227
Issue 22. # Summary: Should there be good standing / supermajority criteria in authoritative ballots? From: Michael Champion Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/76 Closed: Deferred
Issue 23. # Summary: Allow AC Reviews to be made public From: Coralie Mercier Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/63 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/38 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/39 Closed: Deferred
Issue 24. # Summary: Clarify the voting Process From: Jeff Jaffe Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/60 Closed: Deferred
Issue 25. # Summary: Substantive changes undefined for Charter and Process reviews From: Daniel Glazman Comment: https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/176 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/28 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/217 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/218 Closed: Deferred
Issue 26. # Summary: Sections 3.4 and 6.2.6 have different statements about Voting rules in a Charter From: Steve Zilles Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/24 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/24#issuecomment-422468295 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/24#issuecomment-422474665 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/24#issuecomment-490507215
Issue 28. # Summary: The word “dissent” is used more broadly than appropriate given its specific definition From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/239 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/239#issuecomment-461338765 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/239#issuecomment-461428887 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/256 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/239#issuecomment-472435499
Issue 29. # Summary: Grammar fix From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/240 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/240#pullrequestreview-200978577 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/240#issuecomment-461396167 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://www.w3.org/2019/02/13-w3process-minutes.html
Issue 30. # Summary: Applicability of the Pantent Policy on Tag members From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/241 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/241#issuecomment-461640451 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/241#issuecomment-462754733 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/241#issuecomment-468832300 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/241#issuecomment-494177264 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/282 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://www.w3.org/2019/05/22-w3process-minutes.html
Issue 31. # Summary: Resignation of AB and TAG members is illdefined From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/242 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/242#issuecomment-493619703 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/283 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/242#issuecomment-494939326
Issue 32. # Summary: Clarify terminology: minor changes vs editorial changes From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/243 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/269 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/269#pullrequestreview-260554355
Issue 33. # Summary: Undefined term: member-visible From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/244 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/244#issuecomment-490520494
Issue 34. # Summary: Incorrect use of the specialized term "publish" From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/245 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/257 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/245#issuecomment-472436157
Issue 35. # Summary: Does the “Team Submission“ mechanism still serve a purpose? From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/246 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/246#issuecomment-461428127 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/246#issuecomment-464979340 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/246#issuecomment-465001121 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/246#issuecomment-472009020 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/261 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/255 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/255#issuecomment-473982997
Issue 36. # Summary: Remove extraneous phrasing (Editorial) From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/247 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://www.w3.org/2019/02/13-w3process-minutes.html
Issue 37. # Summary: Drop redundant word (Editorial) From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/248 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 38. # Summary: Define "Working Group Decision" From: Charles McCathie Nevile Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/249 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/270 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/270#issuecomment-514653370
Issue 39. # Summary: Remove unneeded sentence fragment (editorial) From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/250 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/250#issuecomment-461744375 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/250#issuecomment-472437269
Issue 40. # Summary: First meeting of a WG allowed too soon From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/251 Closed: Deferred
Issue 41. # Summary: Fix misplaced punctuation From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/252 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 42. # Summary: Update Editor and Former Editors' affiliation From: Coralie Mercier Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/253 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/253#issuecomment-463399703 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/253#issuecomment-463640019 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/253#issuecomment-463949262 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 43. # Summary: Remove overly specific mention of PR in generic sentence about AC reviews From: Coralie Mercier Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/259 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/259#issuecomment-472438787
Issue 44. # Summary: Add sub-section headings to revising a REC From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/294 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/294#pullrequestreview-254696601
Issue 45. # Summary: CR change documentation requirement should be for substantive changes only From: Elika Etemad Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/307 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/308 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/308#issuecomment-530397840
Issue 46. # Summary: Evolution of documents that are linked to the process From: Jeff Jaffe, Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/305 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/319 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/318 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/309 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/309#issuecomment-521268434
Issue 47. # Summary: Add note to Process about flexibility of consensus From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/296 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/323 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/323#issuecomment-530397628
Issue 48. # Summary: Typo From: Coralie Mercier Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/332 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 49. # Summary: Purpose of short terms undefined From: Coralie Mercier Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/333 Closed: Deferred
Issue 50. # Summary: Add references to "Open Stand" principles to the Process From: Larry Masinter Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/325 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/325#issuecomment-545684526 Closed: Rejected Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/325#issuecomment-545480250
Issue 51. # Summary: Drop the distinction between REC and Edited REC From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/362 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/364 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/364#issuecomment-579800586
Issue 52. # Summary: Don't create different classes of RECs for those that can accept new features vs those that cannot From: Elika Etemad Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/345 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/365 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/365#issuecomment-579799691
Issue 53. # Summary: Should W3C drop the idea of a separate Evergreen Track? From: Elika Etemad Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/343 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/304 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/303 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/302 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/301 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/300 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/298 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/297 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/273 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/272 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/271 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/267 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/263 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/343#issuecomment-580173062
Issue 54. # Summary: Section 6 is poorly organized and hard to read From: Elika Etemad Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/336 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/340 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/341 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/348 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/344#issuecomment-572121863
Issue 55. # Summary: Should W3C adopt the so-called Everblue/teal modifications to the REC track? From: Elika Etemad Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/344 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/344#issuecomment-572121863
Issue 56. # Summary: Rephrase Evolution of the Process section From: Wendy Seltzer Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/355 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/367 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/367#issuecomment-585252380
Issue 57. # Summary: Avoid using the word "contributor" to limit conflicts with the patent policy From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/359 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/359#issuecomment-572125274
Issue 58. # Summary: Define a type of publication that is sumultaneously FPWD and CR From: Jeff Jaffe Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/352 Closed: Rejected Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/352#issuecomment-585260875 Verified: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/352#issuecomment-585259948
Issue 59. # Summary: Further automating transition requests From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/260 Closed: Retracted
Issue 60. # Summary: Fix typo From: Tab Atkins Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/266 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 61. # Summary: Can records of appeals ever be made public? From: Nigel Megitt Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/268 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/268#issuecomment-490750384 Closed: Retracted
Issue 62. # Summary: Add more convenient links for review From: Mark Nottingham Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/317 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 63. # Summary: Are W3C hosts members of W3C From: Charles McCathie Nevile Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/10 Closed: OutOfScope Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/10#issuecomment-521317797
Issue 64. # Summary: Update REC-track diagrams From: David Singer Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/390 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 65. # Summary: Use consistent spelling for "judgment" vs "judgement" From: Wendy Seltzer Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/357 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 66. # Summary: Tie everblue to new patent policy From: Wendy Seltzer Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/361 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/306 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/320 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/363 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/395 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/395#issuecomment-611010980
Issue 67. # Summary: Fix typo From: Ralph Swick Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/387 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 68. # Summary: Consistent usage of "Team's Publication Rules" From: Coralie Mercier Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/385 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 69. # Summary: description for "The Art of Consensus" From: Coralie Mercier Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/384 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 70. # Summary: Use actual title of the linked document From: Coralie Mercier Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/383 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 71. # Summary: The guidebook is no longer member-only From: Coralie Mercier Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/371 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 72. # Summary: Add hyphen From: Coralie Mercier Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/369 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 73. # Summary: TAG appointed participants announcement by Director From: Coralie Mercier Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/368 Closed: Deferred
Issue 74. # Summary: ambiguous statement for proxy in WG/IG From: Coralie Mercier Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/368 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/373 Closed: Deferred
Issue 75. # Summary: Removed spurious period mid-sentence From: Coralie Mercier Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/370 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 76. # Summary: Update link that redirected From: Coralie Mercier Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/372 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 77. # Summary: link to ML archive rather than ML mailto From: Coralie Mercier Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/374 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 78. # Summary: Fix typo From: Coralie Mercier Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/375 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 79. # Summary: Fix typo From: Coralie Mercier Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/377 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 80. # Summary: Fixed letter case From: Coralie Mercier Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/378 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 81. # Summary: Write numbers consistently From: Coralie Mercier Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/379 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 82. # Summary: Correct punctuation From: Coralie Mercier Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/380 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 83. # Summary: Consitently order the same terms in the same order From: Coralie Mercier Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/381 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/382 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 84. # Summary: Fix punctuation From: Ivan Herman Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/397 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 85. # Summary: Clarify W3C Decision From: Jeff Jaffe Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/404 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/404#issuecomment-634693844
Issue 86. # Summary: Adjust wording of the Process Evolution section From: Ralph Swick Commment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/388 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://www.w3.org/2020/05/27-w3process-minutes.html#resolution01
Issue 87. # Summary: "Candidate Recommendation" is no longer an accurate term From: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/402 Closed: Deferred Resolved: https://www.w3.org/2020/05/27-w3process-minutes.html#resolution04
Issue 88. # Summary: Patent Policy application to Proposed Changes From: Elika Etemad Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/403 Comment: https://www.w3.org/mid/B9DBE3C4-53AB-4801-9695-853257EA3410@rivoal.net Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/403#issuecomment-642036601
Issue 89. # Summary: Streamlining horizontal reviews From: Lukasz Olejnik Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/347 Closed: Deferred
Issue 90. # Summary: Part of introductory text about REC track is confusing / inaccurate / ineffective From: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/406 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/406#issuecomment-642057764
Issue 91. # Summary: Community Groups and Business Groups should be incorporated into the Process From: Chris Wilson Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/409 Closed: Deferred
Issue 92. # Summary: Increasing voter turnout in AC reviews with incentives From: Anssi Kostiainen Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/410 Closed: Deferred
Issue 93. # Summary: Remove the term "blacklisted" from W3C communications From: guest271314 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/415 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/415#issuecomment-644448791 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/415#issuecomment-644461987 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/415#issuecomment-644521759 Closed: OutOfScope
Issue 94. # Summary: Trim the Changes section From: Elika Etemad Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/412 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/416 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/412#issuecomment-648842528
Issue 95. # Summary: Find name for Proposed Changes under patent review From: Elika Etemad Comment: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/408 Response: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/413 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/413#issuecomment-648843546