<scribe> scribe: debbie

<scribe> agenda: Open Voice Network overview – goals, current activities, future plans, Jon W3C Voice Interaction community group – goals, current activities, future plans, Debbie Brainstorm about specific ideas for future voice standards Potential for cooperation between groups

jon: introduces himself and presents slides

slides https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-voiceinteraction/2020May/0009.html

jon: would like opportunity to cooperate
... topics -- dns for voice, voice commerce, identification, data privacy, interoperability

emmett: how does interoperability work without standards?

jon: we are interested in new standards

emmett: we do need to have standards

jon: doesn't want to become a standards body, but does advocate standards

jim: could you recommend a standard to the W3C?

jon: yes

debbie: is there a proposal for DNS?

jon: starting to proceed on that

debbie: can look at liaison with W3C
... also need to clarify any IP questions

jon: would need to check with counsel
... debbie and dirk should present paper to Open Voice Network
... could join one of OVN meetings

debbie: could have some kind of joint task force

jon: we would welcome that
... will work on formal liaison
... jon and jim, debbie, dirk to join one of their meetings

jim: who is liaison?

debbie: can find out
... will forward liaison pages to jon

jim: debbie and dirk should present to technical committee

debbie: jon could join out group
... will send url to jon

jon: or someone else from OVN could join

debbie: OVN could do more outreach
... reviews slides

jim: OVN would be interested in architecture

debbie: would be great to get comments

dirk: haven't gotten many comments yet

emmett: could dialog manager be pulled out?

dirk: yes, each box could be replaced by something that exists
... this is why we're identifying interfaces

jim: OVN needs to understand what these terms mean

<scribe> ACTION: debbie to forward liaison page

dirk: this is also in our document

<scribe> ACTION: debbie to find url to join

debbie: next agenda is to talk about component

jim: architecture and registry

dirk: dialog registry and provider selection service

emmett: can registry pass along context?

dirk: yes

debbie: reviews use case
... we haven't talked about privacy and security much but this is important

dirk: we should consider trust as well

jim: relationship to MMI

debbie: MMI and Voice Browser standards would be lower level than this architecture
... will review standards in the interfaces work

This is scribe.perl Revision of Date 
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Present: jonStine emmett dirk bev debbie
No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: ddahl_
Found Scribe: debbie

WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found.


WARNING: No date found!  Assuming today.  (Hint: Specify
the W3C IRC log URL, and the date will be determined from that.)
Or specify the date like this:
<dbooth> Date: 12 Sep 2002

People with action items: debbie

WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found!  
Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>.

Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of 
new discussion topics or agenda items, such as:
<dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report


WARNING: IRC log location not specified!  (You can ignore this 
warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain 
a link to the original IRC log.)