<kaz> scribenick: tksuzuki
<kaz> Feb-26 minutes
<kaz> Mar-11 minutes
McCool: No objections?
... (No objections)
<kaz> scribenick: mjk_
Suzuki: set up SoftEther VPN
bridge mode and service mode
... used raspberry pi as a local VPN server on the device
network
... tested bridging across the VPN and multicast
communication
... conclusion is that the minimum requirements are met and we
should do more testing in preparation for the virtual
plugtest
... need to clarify our requirements
McCool: how do we join the VPN, and what about NAT?
Suzuki: there could be multiple interfaces or virtual NAT provided by the VPN but not tested yet
McCool: propose more testing and
verify the NAT operation
... how can we set up a permanent relay
<inserted> scribenick: kaz
Koster: can host for a few months
McCool: can also do but the question
is who to work on that
... e.g., using digital ocean
Koster: seems like worth doing for
virtual f2f because WISHI workshop could also use that
mechanism
... WISHI in April might be a good test case
McCool: why don't we look into what
we can do?
... guess Suzuki-san is using Azure but am wondering if you
could try digital ocean as well
Taki: not sure about digital ocean
McCool: from Intel side, using AWS
instance would be easier
... SoftEther is a Linux package. right?
Taki: available on various
platforms
... this time used the one on Raspberry PI
McCool: wondering if it's possible
for you both, Suzuki-san and Koster, work together for initial
documentation
... and I'll join you
Koster: sounds reasonable
McCool: want to have some standard
mechanism
... for bunch of local devices
... we need a bridge for them
Koster: yeah, we need that
... maybe we can set up some as default
<inserted> scribenick: mjk_
Kaz: can check with W3C system
team to see if they can help
... the policy is generally to ask members to provide the
resources but will ask what they can do
McCool: mjk and tsuzuki get together and plan the work first
<tksuzuki> scribenick: tksuzuki
McCool: we should have doodle
Koster: we need discussions in the same room
McCool: Pick a couple of times for
meeting
... we need a formal report after plugfest
Koster: should be a separate community
McCool: we need volunteers
Ege: node-wot is double licensed
Kaz: we can create a new CG
... however, we need to clarify how to transfer our requirements and feedback to the Eclipse side
... also who should be the liaison contact?
<kaz> Ege: there is a subgroup named thingweb within Eclipse Foundation
<kaz> ... they hold their calls bi-weekly/monthly
<kaz> McCool: can I suggest we create a Doodle poll to see who from our side is interested in this liaison
<kaz> kaz: +1
McCool: opensource framework good for WoT
McCool: (edited issue #2)
<kaz> Issue 2
<McCool> https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/blob/master/events/README.md
<kaz> [adjourned]