W3C

- DRAFT -

Internationalization Working Group Teleconference

19 Mar 2020

Agenda

Attendees

Present
addison, JcK, Bert, Fuqiao, fsasaki
Regrets
Chair
Addison Phillips
Scribe
addison

Contents


trackbot, prepare teleconference

<scribe> scribenick: addison

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2020Mar/0006.html

<agendabot> clear agenda

clear agenda

<scribe> Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2020Mar/0006.html

<agendabot> clear agenda

Agenda and Minutes

Action Items

https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/open

action-869?

<trackbot> action-869 -- Addison Phillips to Write a "sense of the i18n wg" comment on css 4497 -- due 2020-03-19 -- OPEN

<trackbot> https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/869

close action-869

<trackbot> Closed action-869.

Info Share

RADAR Review

https://github.com/w3c/i18n-request/projects/1

<scribe> ACTION: addison: ask CSS why they didn't use our process to request a pre-CR review

<trackbot> Created ACTION-871 - Ask css why they didn't use our process to request a pre-cr review [on Addison Phillips - due 2020-03-26].

<atsushi> https://github.com/orgs/w3c/teams/i18n-reviewers

<xfq> https://github.com/w3c/tr-design/issues/180#issuecomment-577950263

Personalization Semantics self-review response

https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/issues/133#issuecomment-593450546

<scribe> ACTION: addison: convert personalization-semantics comments into separate issues putting needs-resolution and tracker labels

<trackbot> Created ACTION-872 - Convert personalization-semantics comments into separate issues putting needs-resolution and tracker labels [on Addison Phillips - due 2020-03-26].

<r12a> https://www.w3.org/TR/personalization-semantics-content-1.0/

Issues Resolution

<xfq> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2020Mar/0004.html

xfq: made 3 categories of issues
... went through specs and issues to see status
... first category is can be closed
... second is "some inconsistency between issue and us"
... third is "issues need discussion"
... and some still progressing and just omitted

<xfq> https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/9

xfq: webvtt issue
... changes made
... css-background
... 2 issues

<xfq> https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/30

<xfq> https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/31

(discussion of find-text and our string-search document)

<scribe> ACTION: addison: create a PR on string-search pointing to find-text issues and the need to resolve or comment on issues and requirements

<trackbot> Created ACTION-873 - Create a pr on string-search pointing to find-text issues and the need to resolve or comment on issues and requirements [on Addison Phillips - due 2020-03-26].

<r12a> https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/195

https://github.com/w3c/dpub-pagination/issues/4

<scribe> ACTION: xfq: ask after the status of dpub's css-priorities doc in reference to our issue 195

<trackbot> Created ACTION-874 - Ask after the status of dpub's css-priorities doc in reference to our issue 195 [on Fuqiao Xue - due 2020-03-26].

RESOLUTION: close all of xfq's list of to-close issues

xfq: issues have i18n-needs-resolution but our issue has tracker
... if they are i18n group comments should change label to needs-resolution

<scribe> ACTION: atsushi: find out actual status of webvtt documents from issue 15 etc.

<trackbot> Created ACTION-875 - Find out actual status of webvtt documents from issue 15 etc. [on Atsushi Shimono - due 2020-03-26].

<scribe> ACTION: addison: research webvtt horizontal review request and contact plh if there appears to be a gap

<trackbot> Created ACTION-876 - Research webvtt horizontal review request and contact plh if there appears to be a gap [on Addison Phillips - due 2020-03-26].

<scribe> ACTION: richard: update the webvtt issues with correct labels

<trackbot> Created ACTION-877 - Update the webvtt issues with correct labels [on Richard Ishida - due 2020-03-26].

AOB?

<Bert> Mar 26

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: addison: ask CSS why they didn't use our process to request a pre-CR review
[NEW] ACTION: addison: convert personalization-semantics comments into separate issues putting needs-resolution and tracker labels
[NEW] ACTION: addison: create a PR on string-search pointing to find-text issues and the need to resolve or comment on issues and requirements
[NEW] ACTION: addison: research webvtt horizontal review request and contact plh if there appears to be a gap
[NEW] ACTION: atsushi: find out actual status of webvtt documents from issue 15 etc.
[NEW] ACTION: richard: update the webvtt issues with correct labels
[NEW] ACTION: xfq: ask after the status of dpub's css-priorities doc in reference to our issue 195
 

Summary of Resolutions

  1. close all of xfq's list of to-close issues
[End of minutes]

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.154 (CVS log)
$Date: 2020/03/19 16:02:53 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.154  of Date: 2018/09/25 16:35:56  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Present: addison JcK Bert Fuqiao fsasaki
Found ScribeNick: addison
Inferring Scribes: addison
Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2020Mar/0006.html
Found Date: 19 Mar 2020
People with action items: addison appears ask atsushi contact css didn horizontal if our plh process request research review richard t there they use webvtt why xfq

WARNING: IRC log location not specified!  (You can ignore this 
warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain 
a link to the original IRC log.)


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]