<inserted> scribenick: kaz
<kaz> Feb-24 minutes
Zoltan: any problems with the above
minutes?
... I got an action to generate a PR and have crated one
(no objections)
Zoltan: the minutes have been accepted
<inserted> scribenick: zkis
Zoltan: I had an action last meeting, here is the PR for that:
https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/pull/205
https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/pull/205/files
Zoltan: It's just a note in the spec and explainer
Issue 200: https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/200
Zoltan: I will make a PR for making error usage more consistent and also to factor out error reporting from bindings
Issue 205: https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/206
<kaz> (Issue on Discvoery API)
<kaz> (Zoltan asks people to join the Discovery TF call as well)
Issue 204: https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/204
<kaz> (Issue on semantic APIs created by Daniel)
Zoltan: The semantic API suggested by Michael Koster is like the DOM API with semantic annotations
... It's similar to our former approach to the API
Daniel: this would be easy to adapt
to node-wot
... we should keep the core API as it is now and extend it
Issue 201: https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/201
<kaz> (interaction algorithms for Forms, contentType, DataSchema)
Zoltan: This is a bit tricky since we need to define a lot of things that are defined in the TD.
... We can make a note instead of embedding in the algorithms.
Daniel: yes, we should stick with a note.
adjourned