<kaz> Kaz: we invite Christopher today again. right?
<kaz> McCool: yes
<kaz> scribenick: zkis
McCool: still setting up the github
repo
... in the Discovery TF wiki there were prior discussion on
discovery, we need to incorporate it somehow
<kaz> Discovery TF wiki
McCool: created an issue under WoT Security
<kaz> Feb-10 minutes
<kaz> McCool: had further discussion about the publication schedule during the main call
<kaz> ... we'll update the WoT wiki for the publication schedule for all the deliverables
McCool: there was an action to create a revised discovery work schedule in the main WoT wiki page
<kaz> ACTION: kaz to add a note on the publication schedule to the Feb-10 minutes
McCool: past minutes approved
https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/160
<kaz> McCool: Scripting doesn't have a directory
<kaz> Zoltan: actually scripting does support directories
McCool: the proposal was to have
discovery only via directories
... and Scripting using out of band authentication
... maybe consider another API for discovery
Zoltan: there are 2 issue here, architectural and scripting. I think the latter is not well argumented yet.
McCool: OK, it needs more discussion
McCool: there was discussion in the
Security call on decentralized identifiers
... there is related WG work
... and also some work on discovery as well
... will have a presentation about DID; check the security
minutes from today
<kaz> FYI, Feb-17 WoT Security minutes
McCool presenting DID shortly
McCool: including metadata about
service endpoints, that looks much like a TD
... so should we resolve DIDs with TDs
... one of the ways making them unique is via blockchain, in
which we might have TDs
<kaz> Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs) v1.0
McCool: the DID group has not
specifically been looking into IoT devices, so proposed a joint
call
... will discuss timing in the WoT WG call
... one question is whether we need to check security schemes vs DID
... maybe a separate thing from Discovery
... but other opinions are welcome
... next, brainstorming about use cases
McCool: collect short use
cases
... in a new uses-cases readme md file
McCool starts recording use cases
Zoltan: Provisioning/onboarding discovery
McCool: that has multiple use
cases
... one is discovering unowned devices in OCF
Christian: have a device and find out what can I do with it, or what I cannot do because lack of authentication
McCool: that is, peer to peer use case
McCool deduced another use case, Plant Automation
Christian: also, discover what services
are using the devices (reverse lookup)
... but mostly what I can do with the whole installation, on a
higher level
McCool: adding Smart City
services
... also, Visitor, Citizen and Remote access use cases
<inserted> scribenick: kaz
McCool: any other use cases on smart city?
(none)
McCool: (creates another entry for
"cloud services")
... I may want to know what devices are accessible from a
certain cloud service.
... any additional thoughts for use cases?
Zoltan: we can keep it open and add more later
McCool: sure
<inserted> scribenick: zkis
McCool: we could also ask Michael
Lagally to add some
... like Database of Devices
... discovery of historical data from a device
Christopher: a couple of smart home use
cases
... onboarding, ownership, then configuring ACLs for different
roles (visitors, etc)
... there are use cases when operator has access but
beneficiary doesn't
... also, device to device and proxy roles and discovery ACL
configuration
McCool: also, adding hubs,
bridges
... including specific bridges like Zigbee, OCF etc
... please continue adding use cases, and later we will
categorize
... also, curate them later, using templates etc
... in order to be able to merge into Architecture
... also include those use cases which are debatable that
belong to Discovery
... or make PRs and create issues
McCool: first figuring out use
cases, scope, etc
... then, make proposals
... that may also be conflicting
Christian: which proposals are already on table?
McCool: in the main WoT repository, proposals folder
<McCool> https://github.com/w3c/wot/blob/master/proposals/wot-discovery.md
McCool: there are a lot of things to
discuss, but it's a good start
... counterproposals are welcome, but should be aware of
existing background
... AOB?
<inserted> (none)
McCool: For next weeks agenda, please submit proposals by email
adjourned